POST UPTOWN VILLAGE II is a 196-unit, four-story mid-rise built in 1999 with brick exterior and wood-frame construction, yielding 144.2K SF of net leasable area across 171.4K SF gross. The property is positioned in Dallas's Uptown submarket (Walk Score 90) and maintains EXCELLENT quality rating with GOOD current condition. No parking type, utility inclusions, or pet policy details are available in the dataset, limiting full underwriting scope.

POST UPTOWN VILLAGE II sits in an affluent, renter-dense urban micromarket where affordability is tight but sustainable for target tenants. The 1-mile radius shows 88.7% renter occupancy and a 23.7% affordability ratio—high by multifamily standards—yet 52.2% of households earn $100K+, indicating strong income concentration among renters willing to pay premium rates. The sharp drop in renter % (88.7% → 71.6% → 62.0%) as radius expands signals this is a core urban product in high-demand proximity; the 3-mile ring median income drops to $95.4K while affordability improves to 21.3%, showing less competition from owner-occupancy at distance. Income distribution skews heavily toward affluent renters ($150K+ represents 31.3% in 1-mile) rather than workforce housing, supporting a Class A positioning but narrowing the tenant pool during economic softness.

Unit Mix Analysis – POST UPTOWN VILLAGE II

This property is a non-functional dataset: 196 units with only 1 one-bedroom unit recorded represents either incomplete data capture or a significant data integrity issue. Without a populated listings-by-bedroom array or distribution across studio/two/three-bedroom units, market positioning and rent comparison analysis cannot proceed. Recommend data validation before further underwriting.

The property is appraised at $187.8K per unit, with appraisal value growing 3.5% YoY to $36.8M—modest appreciation consistent with Dallas multifamily market conditions. Land represents 24.8% of total value ($9.1M), limiting redevelopment optionality; the improvements-heavy split reflects a stabilized 1999-vintage asset with limited tear-down economics. With only a single recent appraisal in the dataset, trend analysis is constrained, but the per-unit valuation suggests fair-market positioning for a mid-cycle Class B property in the Uptown submarket.

Rating trajectory masks underlying operational gaps. The 4.3 overall rating reflects skewed distribution—71.2% five-star reviews (215/302) paired with 11.6% one-star reviews (35/302)—suggesting a bifurcated resident experience rather than consistent quality. Recent six-month stability at 4.8 is driven by overwhelmingly positive recent submissions, yet the one-star cohort (11.6% of all reviews) consistently cites unresolved systemic issues: mailbox break-ins with management inaction, leasing process friction, and remote transaction failures. Staff performance (Jessica, Matthew, Cooper) is the property's operational anchor and masks underlying maintenance and security deficiencies that management has not addressed at scale. This review profile suggests strong on-site execution for engaged residents but weak problem resolution and preventive maintenance governance—red flags for capex intensity and liability exposure post-acquisition.