2001 W CAMPBELL RD, GARLAND (DALLAS CO), TX, 750442914
$49,450,000
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 1.0% from prior year
The refinance cliff dominates the risk profile: a $25.3M loan at 3.68% matures August 2026 against an asset appreciating just 1.0% YoY, forcing rate-adjustment pressure on an owner who appears motivated to exit (21.7-year hold, absentee structure, 26.5% discount-to-appraisal asking price). The 308-unit Class B portfolio (1997 vintage, $160.6K/unit appraised value) captures premium rents from a narrow, affluent 1-mile radius ($118.7K median HHI, 28.7% earning $150K+), but exhibits operational deterioration—recent Google reviews show 29.9% one-star ratings concentrated in 2025 with leasing/payment processing failures—that masks sound maintenance fundamentals. Photo analysis reveals selective capital deployment: common areas upgraded but unit interiors remain dated (2010-2015 finishes, builder-grade kitchens/appliances) with documented bathroom mold, limiting unit-level upside; the 79% improvements/21% land split offers no redevelopment optionality. No near-term supply pressure (0 units in pipeline), but submarket vacancy is widening, signaling demand-side headwinds that will constrain pricing power independent of new competition.
Directional read: Watch-list with refinance trigger. The property presents a distressed-light acquisition window (motivated seller pre-maturity, below-market appraisal) if operational issues (leasing staff, payment systems) can be fixed with new management, but the tight 13.9% affordability ratio, car-dependent location (Walk Score 48), and softening submarket fundamentals limit upside beyond rent stabilization. Only pursue if entry price reflects sub-$150K/unit basis with 90+ days for operational diagnostics.
No notes yet
Where brick, stone, and nature unite
Where brick, stone, and nature unite, Seven Oaks Apartments creates a beautifully crafted and enduring living experience. Discover timeless charm among our apartments in Garland, offering one, two, and even three-bedroom layouts. Every detail reflects top-notch quality — from oval garden tubs to gourmet kitchens. Outside, along with controlled access gates, a resort-inspired atmosphere awaits, featuring a three-tier pool and the serene Spring Creek Forest as part of your backyard.
Seven Oaks Apts: Class B property with selective renovation and maintenance gaps limiting upside.
The 308-unit 1997 garden-style community shows uneven capital deployment: while common areas (clubhouse, pool, landscaping) received quality recent upgrades with modern furnishings and aesthetic appeal, unit interiors reflect mixed vintages—a single kitchen photo reveals 2010-2015 era finishes (white shaker cabinets, laminate countertops, builder-grade appliances) that are now dated, and only 4 of 27 analyzed photos show upgrades versus 7 builder-grade units. The critical red flag is the bathroom image documenting visible mold/mildew deterioration along caulking seams, signaling deferred maintenance on waterproofing that likely extends across the portfolio. With 6 of 27 photos rated "fair" condition and paint noted as "needs maintenance," the property is in Class B territory without significant value-add from unit-level renovation—management has prioritized common area appeal over unit integrity, a misallocation that will constrain rent growth.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Seven Oaks Apts trades walkability for affordability in a car-dependent suburb. With a Walk Score of 48 and Transit Score of 26, this 308-unit property demands tenant vehicle ownership—a constraint that typically caps rents and limits appeal to transit-reliant demographics. The Bike Score of 31 suggests minimal last-mile connectivity. Without stated rents, the location profile appears positioned for workforce housing rather than premium urban renters; suburban Garland's car dependency aligns with value-oriented positioning but limits upside to wage growth tied to Dallas employment centers rather than walkable neighborhood amenities.
No notes yet
No near-term supply pressure, but deteriorating submarket fundamentals present a headwind. With zero units in the pipeline (0.0% of the 308-unit inventory), Seven Oaks faces no direct competitive threat from new deliveries. However, the deteriorating vacancy trend in the submarket signals softer demand dynamics that could constrain occupancy and rent growth regardless of new supply—suggesting the risk is demand-side rather than supply-side. Monitor submarket absorption rates closely; if vacancy continues to widen, pricing power will erode even without new competing projects.
No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles
No notes yet
The 21.7-year hold by Southwest Seven Oaks Partners LP masks refinancing risk: a $25.3M loan (51.1% LTV against appraised value; $82.1K per unit) originated in August 2016 on a 10-year term matures in August 2026 at a 3.68% rate—well below current market, creating acute refinance pressure within two years. The property's 26.5% discount to appraised value ($36.1M estimated sale vs. $49.5M appraisal) and lack of DSCR data prevent full stress testing, but the absence of recent transaction details and the absentee individual ownership structure suggest the owner may be motivated to exit before rate-adjustment headwinds intensify. Three transactions in 21 years indicate a buy-and-hold strategy rather than active trading, reducing distress signals.
No notes yet
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $25,282,500 (Aug 2016, attom) @ 3.68%
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Seven Oaks Apartments is a 308-unit, three-story garden-style complex built in 1997 with brick exterior and wood-frame construction totaling 284.4K SF in Garland (Dallas County), positioned in a car-dependent suburban area (Walk Score: 48). Unit finishes reflect mid-to-upper-market positioning: nine-foot/vaulted ceilings, hardwood entry, gourmet kitchens with white cabinetry, washer/dryer connections, and oval tubs across one-, two-, and three-bedroom layouts. Parking consists of attached and detached garages with automatic doors plus reserved covered spaces. Pet policy caps at three per unit with breed restrictions on 16 categories including pit bulls and German Shepherds.
No notes yet
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | 1BR | 1 | 773 | $1,216 | Inactive | Oct 27 | 189 |
No notes yet
SEVEN OAKS APTS: Affluent Urban Core, Challenged by Affordability Mismatch
The 1-mile micro-market is materially stronger than the broader trade area: $118.7K median household income, 55.3% renter concentration, and a heavily skewed income distribution (28.7% earn $150K+) signal a high-barrier-to-entry urban core where renters are forced rather than preference-driven. However, the 13.9% affordability ratio at 1-mile radius indicates the property's rent likely consumes ~14% of local median income—tight but supportable. The gap widens sharply at 3-mile (20.3%) and 5-mile (20.8%) radii, where median income flattens to ~$98.8K and renter concentration drops to 40.3%; this suggests the property captures premium rents from a narrow, affluent slice of the 1-mile ring rather than drawing broad workforce demand. Income distribution skew remains top-heavy even at 5-mile (26.4% earn $150K+), indicating no true affordable housing positioning—this asset competes for high-income renters in a limited geographic footprint with weak suburban spillover.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 2 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
Unable to provide analytical interpretation. The unit mix data shows only 1 one-bedroom unit across 308 total units, which is internally inconsistent and likely a data entry error rather than an actual portfolio composition. Without accurate bedroom distribution, rental rates by unit type, and market comparables, a meaningful assessment of concentration risk, pricing strategy, or demographic alignment cannot be performed. Recommend data validation before proceeding with underwriting.
Estimated from 1 listed units (0.3% of 308 total)
No notes yet
3 pet maximum per apartment. Service animals welcome. Breed restrictions include: Akita, Chow Chow, Dalmatian, Doberman, German Shepherd, Great Dane, Husky, Malamute, Mastiff, Pit Bull, Presa Canario, Rottweiler, American Bulldog, Wolf, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and Saint Bernard.
No notes yet
Appraisal Analysis: Seven Oaks Apts
Current appraised value of $49.5M translates to $160.6K per unit—a modest valuation for a 1997-vintage 308-unit asset in today's market, suggesting either below-average location/condition or conservative underwriting. The 1.0% YoY appreciation is essentially flat, indicating the property has stalled in the recent cycle rather than participating in market recovery. The improvement-to-land split (79% improvements / 21% land) leaves limited redevelopment optionality; the asset is tied to its current use case with minimal land arbitrage potential. Without prior-year appraisal history, cannot assess whether this flatness reflects property-specific underperformance or broader market headwinds.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $49,450,000 | +1.0% |
No notes yet
Seven Oaks shows deteriorating management execution despite a polarized resident base. The 4.7-point gap between recent (2.7) and prior (2.3) six-month averages masks a critical trend: 29 of 97 reviews (29.9%) are 1-star, concentrated in 2025, with consistent complaints around leasing staff responsiveness, delayed maintenance (exterior repairs, patio access through freezes), and payment processing failures. Long-term residents (10+ years) consistently praise the property amenities and maintenance teams, but operational friction at the leasing office—tour confirmations, unit availability miscommunication, rent processing—is actively damaging acquisition and retention. This bifurcated experience suggests capable maintenance staff and asset bones (308 units, amenities) undermined by front-office leadership gaps, indicating either management transition instability or systematic process breakdown that will compress margins until addressed.
98 reviews total
I recently posted a scathing review, thinking my concerns were being blown off. That wasn’t the case. My emails didn’t go straight to the manager, emails are responded to by leasing staff first. Apparently, and what I think is a great idea, the ladies in the front are Switzerland, meaning totally neutral. I can see how some can feel they’re not being heard. That’s not the case, they’re just doing what they’re told. Don’t speak for the owner. That’s the managers department. If you start to get upset and feel that way, call Kristen. She handles that stuff. So before you go online and post and bad review, calm down and give her a shot. I went from super ticked to here eating crow! If you’re looking from out of town and want that extra piece of mind give her that one last call before you leave and give her a shot at making sure nothing falls between the cracks. They don’t get that last star because my particular building could definitely use some stepping stones where sidewalk ends and appliance updates, but I’ve been here so long and appliances aren’t in bad enough condition for me to make a call about. I’m pretty sure when my lease is up they’ll address that and the next person will love it. It’s quiet, has a great view, and its position blocks the cold north winds and summer sun goes over hours before the heat of the day. The secrets out only because I’m moving closer to grandkids😀 You’ll have to ask Kristen for actual apt #
The management was so kind and knowledgeable, I went there just my kids and I and this is definitely our next home, my kids loved it the people around seem nice. Management were dedicated and definitely make just the next move feel like the move home!
Apartment hunting is stressful enough on its own. I scheduled a tour online for today at 10:30 AM. Typically, leasing agents follow up after a tour is scheduled to confirm needs such as whether you’re looking for a 1-, 2-, or 3-bedroom apartment; however, I did not receive any follow-up. The website showed availability for 3-bedroom units, which is why I scheduled the appointment.
When I arrived, the leasing agent asked how she could help and seemed surprised when I said I had an appointment, stating they had not checked the schedule—even though the tour was booked on Wednesday for Saturday. I was then informed that there were no 3-bedroom apartments available.
An opportunity for improvement in customer service would be staying on top of scheduled appointments to avoid wasting both the prospective renter’s and the leasing agent’s time. Overall, the experience was not customer-friendly.
Used to love this place but due to their unprofessional behavior and delayed exterior repairs that have required us to have all patio furniture indoors through the holidays and the freeze I no longer can recommend these apartments. They continually fail to properly notify and update tenants about repairs that they are more than happy to threaten to fine for "non compliance" when the best they can do for a deadline is "the forseeable future" or "when we tell you that you can use the patios again". Mind you since December all that appears to be done is a bunch of public disturbance and some poorly half done painting that has made the area look WORSE! Add this to not being able to move in my apartment due to lack of space, a constant sense of privacy invasion, and being randomly closed into my apartment with the front door being blocked by tape and tarp/large sheets of paper on multiple occasions without notice so they continue their botched paint job. As a tenant who has been at this property for 2 years and up until about 6 months ago I would have highly recommended this property. Now I would highly suggest going elsewhere if you value privacy, a sense of security, and mutual respect which appears to be tragically lacking as late.
Owner response
Thank you for your feedback. We apologize for the frustration this exterior repainting project has caused, especially as a long-term resident who previously enjoyed living here. We understand how disruptive it is to have patio furniture brought inside for an extended period of time.
While we’ve been working to move this project forward as efficiently as possible, there have been unavoidable weather-related delays, including freezing temperatures and icy conditions that prevent painting from being completed safely and correctly. That said, we understand that the timeline has felt excessive and the impact on your day-to-day living has been significant.
Our team has worked diligently to provide timely notices through email and posting flyers to your door. Please know, we will remain committed to maintaining this communication throughout the project.
1-Star Review: Overpriced, Poorly Managed, and Zero Customer Service
If you value basic access and respectful communication, do not move here. The monthly rent of $1,500 is completely unjustified given the consistently poor operation of this complex.
The security gates are a daily headache, relying on a faulty app that makes them inaccessible most of the time. Residents are constantly left waiting outside because the technology fails to grant them entry—a ridiculous situation for a paid-for service.
The management team operates with a severe lack of courtesy. As a resident of three years, I was late on rent by two days for the first time. Instead of a simple courtesy email or call, I immediately received an aggressive "Notice to Vacate" taped to my apartment door. This action confirms that the office simply does not care about its tenants. Save your money and look elsewhere.
No notes yet
No notes yet