6200 N SHILOH RD, GARLAND (DALLAS CO), TX
$63,250,000
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 12.9% from prior year
PASS. This 338-unit, 1999-vintage asset in Garland presents a classic distressed-debt refinancing forced sale masking severe operational and valuation dysfunction. The seller is transacting at $91.0M (43% above $63.3M appraisal, 240% LTV) to escape $152.0M in debt with a December 2025 maturity wall—immediate red flag that price discovery is driven by refinancing desperation, not market fundamentals. Despite zero new supply risk and a high-income 1-mile demographic, the property is underperforming rents by 34.6% on 1BR units ($873 vs. $1.3K submarket), carrying $6.4K NOI/unit against $7.2K–$8.1K Class B Dallas benchmarks, with a structurally inverted 2.37% cap rate that demands either aggressive value-add or price correction to justify acquisition. Management dysfunction surfaces across five Google reviews (2.6 stars, three 1-star complaints on leasing responsiveness and operations), operational metrics show 6.8% vacancy with concessions at 4 weeks free, and the tenant base skews to an affluent micro-market with limited expansion potential—demographic pull is compressed within the 1-mile radius rather than scalable at submarket rents. While the asset holds patchwork renovation upside (5% of units show 2018–2022 finishes), the combination of forced-sale timing, negative leverage, underperforming rent, and management collapse positions this as a distressed workout requiring 24+ months of operational stabilization and rent recovery—economically achievable but operationally high-risk at asking price. Watch-list only if price resets to $72M–$75M and current management is demonstrably replaced.
No notes yet
Top Dog Living - #1 Pet & Dog Friendly Apartments in the U.S.
Award-winning pet-friendly apartment community recognized as #1 dog-friendly apartments in the U.S. Features spacious one-, two-, and three-bedroom floor plans with amenities including fitness center, clubhouse, jogging trail, playground, BBQ area, covered parking, valet trash, high-speed internet, and dedicated pet yards with doggy doors. Dog-centric apartment complex created exclusively for dogs and their owners with an onsite dog park and nature preserve access.
Interior Finishes & Renovation Status:
The property shows selective unit upgrades rather than property-wide renovation—kitchen photography reveals 2018–2022 era finishes (white shaker cabinetry, quartz countertops, stainless appliances, subway tile), but this represents a single renovated unit among 338. The mix of flooring types across the dataset (tile, vinyl plank, carpet) and renovation dates spanning 2008–2021 indicates a patchwork upgrade approach, likely addressing turnover rather than executing a coordinated capital plan.
Positioning & Value-Add Potential:
Built in 1999 with excellent exterior condition and podium/garage parking, Equinox occupies the Class B-to-B+ spectrum—well-maintained mid-rise in a strong Firewheel Town Center location but lacking the comprehensive interior modernization typical of Class A. The fitness center appears functional but modest. With only ~5% of sampled images showing premium finishes and 1 unit evidencing modern kitchen standards, substantial value-add exists through standardized kitchen/bath renovation across the portfolio, estimated at high ROI given the property's underlying location and infrastructure quality.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Walkability-Rent Mismatch Signals Tenant Constraints. Walk Score of 49 and Transit Score of 28 classify this Garland property as car-dependent with minimal transit access, yet avg monthly rent of $1,038 suggests workforce/value positioning rather than urban-core pricing. The low walkability profile limits appeal to transit-reliant renters and increases household transportation costs, which compressed rent levels fail to offset—a structural headwind for occupancy unless the submarket has high car ownership rates or limited competitive alternatives. Distance to Dallas employment centers and nearby amenity density (restaurants, grocery, fitness) need verification to assess whether the location justifies the rent-to-walkability disconnect.
No notes yet
Zero pipeline risk in this submarket. No permitted or under-construction multifamily projects exist nearby, and the 0.0% pipeline ratio confirms no material new supply is queued within competitive range. This insulates EQUINOX ON THE PARK from near-term occupancy pressure and positions it favorably for rent growth over the next 24–36 months, assuming submarket fundamentals remain stable.
No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles
No notes yet
Immediate refinancing crisis and distress signals: The property carries $152.0M in total debt against a $63.3M appraised value (240% LTV), with the largest loan ($59.1M) maturing December 2025—nine months away at current acquisition. A second $59.1M loan already matured in December 2023 and remains unresolved, and a $6.0M construction loan matures October 2025. This debt-to-unit ratio of $449.7K/unit against $187.2K appraised value per unit reflects severe negative leverage and refinancing risk at current rates. The ownership chain shows the classic distress pattern: quit-claim deed transfer (2015), followed by stand-alone financing (2020), then rapid flips every 3.3 years through 2025, with the current owner (Pleasanton Housing Finance) a passive financial entity rather than an operator. Absentee ownership combined with matured/maturing debt and an estimated sale price of $91.0M (43% above appraisal) suggests the seller is forcing a transaction to escape a refinancing wall.
No notes yet
Equinox on the Park trades at a 130% premium to submarket per-unit pricing ($269.1K vs. $117.3K), yet the 2.37% estimated cap rate signals severe overvaluation relative to current NOI generation. The $2.16M NOI on 338 units ($6.4K/unit) sits below stabilized Class B Dallas benchmarks (typically $7.2K–$8.1K/unit), while a 45% opex ratio is healthy; the disconnect suggests the $91.0M asking price assumes significant rent growth or operational improvements not yet embedded in trailing financials. The 104-bps spread between estimated (2.37%) and implied (3.41%) cap rates indicates the appraisal ($63.3M) is $27.7M underwater relative to listing price—a structural misalignment that requires either aggressive value-add execution or price correction to clear.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $59,130,000 (Mar 2025, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Equinox on the Park is a 338-unit, three-story garden-style apartment community built in 1999 with wood frame construction and brick exterior, delivering 326.5K SF of net leasable area in Garland. The property is positioned as a pet-centric asset with comprehensive dog amenities (dedicated yards with doggy doors, on-site dog park, temperament-tested acceptance of all breeds, 3-pet maximum per unit) and in-unit W/D, modern appliances, and smart home technology (Nest, keyless entry, monitoring cameras). Parking is attached garage with valet trash service; the property sits in a car-dependent submarket (Walk Score 49), south of downtown Dallas. No utilities are included in rent, and the property maintains excellent quality with good physical condition.
No notes yet
Equinox on the Park is materially underperforming market rents across all unit types, with asking rents 34.6% below submarket 1BR comps ($873 vs. $1.3K) and 33.5% below 2BR benchmarks ($1.1K vs. $1.7K). Current concessions of 4 weeks free and 23 vacant units (6.8% availability) suggest aggressive rent capture mode rather than pricing power; recent lease signings on 1BR units cluster at the $707–$884 band, indicating effective rents likely tracking 25–30% below asking. The 3BR unit type holds closest to market ($1.3K) but represents negligible lease volume in recent events data, leaving 1BR and 2BR units as operational drag on blended NOI.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
Min/avg/max asking rents from property website
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BR | 1 | 707 | $1,543 | Active | Apr 12 | 725 | |
|
Apr $1,543
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,277 | $1,277 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,277
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,274 | $1,274 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,274
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,274 | $1,274 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,274
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,242 | $1,242 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,242
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,242 | $1,242 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,242
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,222 | $1,222 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,222
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,217 | $1,217 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,217
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,202 | $1,202 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,202
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,202 | $1,202 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,202
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,131 | $1,131 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,131
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 1 | 979 | $979 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $979
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 1 | 979 | $979 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $979
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 1 | 907 | $907 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $907
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 884 | $884 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $884
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 1 | 871 | $871 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $871
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 1 | 871 | $871 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $871
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 857 | $857 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $857
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 830 | $830 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $830
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 751 | $751 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $751
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 707 | $707 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $707
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 707 | $707 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $707
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 707 | $707 | Active | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $707
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,274 | $1,274 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,274
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,274 | $1,274 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,274
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,131 | $1,131 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $1,131
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 1 | 979 | $979 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $979
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 929 | $929 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $929
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 884 | $884 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $884
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 857 | $857 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $857
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 830 | $830 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $830
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 751 | $751 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $751
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 707 | $707 | Inactive | Mar 20 | — | |
|
Mar $707
|
|||||||
No notes yet
EQUINOX ON THE PARK exhibits strong affordability fundamentals with a high-income tenant base, but the 1-mile micro-market signals price ceiling risk. The $1,038/month rent generates a 22.9% affordability ratio in the immediate 1-mile radius—healthy on paper—but this micro-market skews significantly affluent (25.9% earning $150K+) relative to the 3-mile and 5-mile rings, suggesting the property may be positioned above natural demand density. The 52.4% renter concentration in the 1-mile radius is notably higher than the 41.5% at 3-miles, indicating a compressed rental pool; if the property is already capturing the urban-core renter cohort, marginal demand relies on the broader suburban rings where median income drops to $95.5K and affordability ratios soften to 21.2%. Income distribution skew is consistent across all radii (25–27% earn $150K+), confirming this is an affluent renter market rather than workforce housing, which limits tenant volume and magnifies lease-up sensitivity to economic headwinds.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 2 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
Data integrity issue prevents meaningful analysis. The unitmix object lists only 1 total unit across all bedroom types, while listingsby_bedroom shows 23 units (8 one-bed, 13 two-bed, 2 three-bed) and the property claims 338 total units. Without complete unit inventory data, we cannot assess concentration risk, rent progression, or market positioning. Request corrected asset-level unit mix breakdown before proceeding with valuation or lease-up analysis.
Estimated from 1 listed units (0.3% of 338 total)
No notes yet
All friendly dogs accepted regardless of breed or size. Up to 3 dogs per apartment. Dogs undergo temperament testing during application. Does not accept aggressive dogs regardless of breed or size. Accepts all dog breeds including pit bulls, dobermans, rottweilers, huskies, American Pitbull Terrier, Doberman Pinscher, Chow Chow, Siberian Husky, Cane Corso, Great Dane, and German Shepherd. Cats also welcome. Total pet allowance is 3 pets per unit.
No notes yet
Appraisal Summary: EQUINOX ON THE PARK
Current appraised value of $63.3M reflects robust 12.9% YoY appreciation, translating to $187.1K per unit—well-positioned for a 1999-vintage, stabilized asset. Land represents only 7.5% of total value ($4.7M), leaving 92.5% in improvements, which signals limited redevelopment upside but strong income-producing fundamentals supporting the valuation. With only one appraisal in the dataset, we cannot assess multi-year trends or detect market cycles; request historical appraisals from 2023-24 to validate whether appreciation reflects broad market recovery or property-specific outperformance.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $63,250,000 | +12.9% |
No notes yet
EQUINOX ON THE PARK: Severe Management Dysfunction Masks Potential Asset
The 2.6-star rating on just five reviews is an acute red flag, driven by three 1-star complaints centering on leasing operations—non-responsive scheduling (2-week callback delays), opaque deposit handling, and poor tenant communication. The two 5-star reviews lack substance (one blank, one generic), offering no counterweight to documented operational failures. With no temporal trend data available and a minimal review sample, the pattern suggests either recent management collapse or systematic neglect of the leasing pipeline that would directly impact occupancy and revenue. This operational dysfunction materially undermines deal thesis unless it reflects recent turnover already corrected; verification of current leasing performance and management tenure is critical pre-LOI.
5 reviews total
We lived here for one year and the experience was great!!!!
Horrible communication, DO NOT APPLY online, it has been almost 3 months since we applied online and it asks for security deposit. Which if denied this security deposit has to be returned. We were told we would recieve a check back in our Houston address, which it did not, we were then told numerous times it would be another 2 weeks. We requested for so said "check" to be mailed to their apartment office and we would pick it up. Still no check, no response, no call back, and now dodging our calls. The manager at this place needs to get back to us ASAP! This is fraud you're doing. Taking peoples security deposits. (I understand the application fee, but this is the security deposit.)
Called this Apartment complex for 2 days to schedule a tour and finally received a c/b today (2 weeks later) no apology no nothing. I am kinda glad this happened to be honest...now I see why the ratings on this community are what they are. Speaking to the Leasing Agent was like speaking to a robot, no care in the world for finally calling someone back regarding an apartment 2 weeks later.
No notes yet
No notes yet