6310 NAAMAN FOREST BLVD, GARLAND (DALLAS CO), TX, 75044
$49,250,000
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 4.8% from prior year
Single largest risk: $147.0M construction loan matured August 2023 with no recorded payoff, creating immediate refinancing pressure at 298% LTV into a materially higher-rate environment. The property itself is operationally sound—$49.3M appraisal, 3.6% vacancy, $10.4K NOI/unit—but the overleveraged capital structure and silent debt status signal the current owner faces acute downside risk or forced disposition. Demographically, REVE targets upscale renters (68.6% renter occupancy, 40.5% earning $100K+) in a supply-constrained submarket, though recent Google review deterioration (4.7 → 4.3 rating, staffing friction) and 3-bedroom underperformance (19.3% rent discount to comps) suggest operational execution gaps post-lease. The car-dependent location (Walk Score 19) and 12.7% unit price premium to submarket comps offer minimal cap rate expansion upside; at 4.75% yield versus 5.09% submarket average, entry economics require distressed pricing or refinancing solutions to justify acquisition. Verdict: Watch-list pending debt clarification. If the matured loan is confirmed and the owner faces forced refinancing, REVE becomes a potential acquisition candidate at a material discount; absent debt resolution visibility, the risk/reward skews negative for stabilized multifamily investors.
No notes yet
MODERN LUXURY WITH STYLE TO SPARE
Up-end the ordinary with a new studio, one, two, or three-bedroom apartments at The ReVe. These pet-friendly apartments near Richardson will make each day something special, with resort-caliber amenities, elegant designer finishes, and apartment features that rival any five-star hotel. All with unrivaled access to Garland's best destinations and beyond. Come home to extraordinary – live, love, The ReVe. Elevate your days with a pet-friendly luxury apartment in Garland, Texas, near Richardson. Complete with designer elements like sparkling stainless-steel appliances, elegant granite countertops, and custom tiled backsplashes, and kitchen islands in select homes, these beautiful apartments are designed for living well – and showing off. Meanwhile, USB charging ports, easy-to-clean wood-style flooring, and a full-size washer and dryer make keeping up appearances quick and easy behind the scenes. Live that chic modern life you've been dreaming of, with very little effort, at The ReVe.
REVE's 2019 construction with 2020-2023 unit renovations positions it as a well-maintained Class A property with minimal value-add upside. The renovated units feature modern slab cabinetry, quartz countertops, vinyl plank flooring, and in-unit washer/dryer—consistent with contemporary multifamily standards. However, the photo sample (13 images, mostly floorplans) provides limited visibility into unit consistency, exterior condition depth, or amenity quality relative to competitive Class A stock; the construction activity visible in the courtyard warrants clarification on scope and timeline.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
REVE Apartments' car-dependent location (Walk Score 19, Transit Score 27) significantly constrains its addressable tenant pool to renters with personal vehicles, yet the $1.8M average rent reflects suburban positioning rather than premium urban amenities. Garland's limited walkability to dining, grocery, and fitness infrastructure means residents absorb transportation costs—a drag on effective NOI for renters making under $75K annually. The property's rent point is appropriate for its supply-constrained submarket but leaves minimal upside without transit infrastructure improvements or repositioning toward cost-conscious commuters. This profile works for workforce housing, not Class A, and assumes stable employment corridors accessible via I-30/I-635.
No notes yet
Construction Pipeline Analysis
Zero competing units in the pipeline (0.0% of the 225-unit inventory) eliminates supply-side headwinds in the near term, but the deteriorating vacancy trend signals demand weakness unrelated to new construction—likely driven by existing competitive pressures or market softening. With no permitted projects visible, the submarket appears supply-constrained at the macro level, yet the occupancy deterioration suggests REVE faces either product-specific or locational headwinds that new supply scarcity cannot offset. Monitor whether vacancy stabilizes or continues eroding; persistent deterioration despite limited pipeline competition indicates deeper tenant demand issues requiring operational intervention rather than reliance on supply tightness.
No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles
No notes yet
Critical refinancing pressure: The $147.0M Citi construction/stabilization loan matured August 2023 and remains active without recorded payoff, signaling either a silent default, loan extension negotiation, or missing payoff data—all red flags requiring immediate clarification. At $653K per unit, the loan-to-value sits at 298%, an inverted structure typical of post-stabilization bridge or mezzanine debt rather than permanent financing, indicating the property likely needs urgent refinancing into conventional product at current rates. The 4.8-year hold by an absentee LLC (originating from the 2021 acquisition) and single-transaction history offer no distress signals, but the overleveraged capital stack and matured debt suggest the current owner faces material downside risk or refinancing necessity at materially higher rates than the original 26-month term.
No notes yet
REVE trades at a 34bp discount to submarket cap rates (4.75% vs. 5.09%), positioning this 2019 Class A asset as stabilized rather than value-add. NOI per unit of $10.4K sits modestly above the $9.2K Dallas metro Class A average, supported by a healthy 50.0% opex ratio and tight 3.6% vacancy. The property's $218.9K price per unit (implied from $49.3M appraised value ÷ 225 units) exceeds submarket comps by $24.7K (+12.7%), a premium justified by newer vintage and operational performance but leaving minimal cap rate expansion upside. Tax burden of $5.5K per unit is elevated—typical of newer Dallas properties—and consumes 52.7% of NOI, constraining value-add levers.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $147,000,000 (Jun 2021, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
REVE Apartments is a 225-unit, four-story mid-rise completed in 2019 with 276.2K SF of brick/wood-frame construction in Garland (Dallas County), rated excellent condition and quality. The property offers studio through three-bedroom floor plans with designer finishes across 209.4K SF of leasable area and is pet-friendly, though specific parking ratios are not disclosed. Located in a car-dependent area (Walk Score: 19), the asset is positioned as a luxury product competing on amenity appeal rather than transit proximity or urban walkability.
No notes yet
Reve Apartments is underperforming market benchmarks across all unit types, with particularly weak positioning in larger units. Studios and 1-bedrooms command 16.7% and 14.8% premiums to market ($1.551K vs. $1.329K and $1.629K vs. $1.419K), but 2-bedrooms and 3-bedrooms trade at discounts of 2.7% and 19.3% respectively ($2.075K vs. $2.020K and $2.162K vs. $2.680K). With 8 units actively marketed (3.6% of the 225-unit portfolio), zero concessions currently posted, and 17 units shown available in the most recent snapshot, the property is leasing productively in smaller units but faces material headwinds in 2+ bedroom demand or pricing power. Rent spread across all units is tight ($1.507K–$2.355K), suggesting limited mix benefit to offset the 3-bedroom drag.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
Min/avg/max asking rents from property website
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BR | 3 | 1,476 | $2,210 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $2,210
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 3 | 1,426 | $2,113 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $2,113
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,144 | $2,075 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $2,075
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 750 | $1,667 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,667
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 773 | $1,626 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,626
|
|||||||
| Studio | 1 | 726 | $1,595 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,565
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 726 | $1,595 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,595
|
|||||||
| Studio | 1 | 663 | $1,507 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,507
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,262 | $2,355 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $2,355
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,180 | $2,221 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $2,221
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,208 | $2,193 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $2,193
|
|||||||
| — | 2BR | 2 | 1,144 | $2,117 | Inactive | Dec 22 | 595 |
| 1BR | 1 | 999 | $1,812 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,812
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 852 | $1,797 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,797
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 800 | $1,707 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,707
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 800 | $1,707 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,707
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 849 | $1,707 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,707
|
|||||||
| Unit 1014 | 1BR | 1 | 726 | $1,219 | Inactive | Sep 29 | 37 |
No notes yet
Affordability mismatch in dense urban core; affluent renter concentration masks suburban demand weakness. The 1-mile radius shows 68.6% renter occupancy but a 24.6% affordability ratio—tight for $1,798.50 rents against $88.4K median household income, indicating the property targets upscale renters or captures spillover from ownership constraints, not workforce housing. Income distribution skews high (40.5% earn $100K+), confirmed by the 3-mile radius showing 47.5% in that bracket and only 7.8% under $25K. The dramatic renter concentration drop from 68.6% (1-mile) to 41.9% (3-mile) to 38.5% (5-mile) signals this is a dense, renter-preferred submarket rather than a suburban play—asset strength depends on localized employment or lifestyle amenities, not regional job growth. Median household income rises slightly at 3-miles ($100.1K) before flattening, suggesting the immediate trade area is the relevant demand driver rather than broader metro expansion.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 1 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
Unit Mix Analysis — REVE APARTMENTS
The property displays severe data inconsistency: unit mix totals only 3 units against a stated 225-unit portfolio, yet listing detail shows 8 units across all bedroom types. Assuming the listing detail is accurate, the portfolio is heavily skewed toward inefficiently small unit counts that prevent meaningful rent or demographic analysis. A 2BR/3BR+ presence (3 of 8 units, 37.5%) suggests some family-oriented positioning, but the sample is too thin—and the 0% studio concentration atypical for a 2019 Dallas asset—to draw reliable conclusions on market alignment. Data validation required before portfolio-level assessment.
Estimated from 2 listed units (0.9% of 225 total)
No notes yet
pet-friendly
No notes yet
Appraisal Interpretation: REVE Apartments
Reve's $49.3M valuation reflects modest 4.8% YoY appreciation for a 2019 vintage asset, translating to $218.9K per unit—reasonable but not exuberant for a six-year-old Class A product in the current rate environment. The land basis of just $1.95M (4.0% of total value) offers minimal redevelopment optionality; the improvement-heavy capital stack ($47.3M) locks equity into the existing operating platform. Without prior appraisals, the single-year growth rate appears consistent with market rents recovering post-2022 but doesn't signal distress or significant upside momentum.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $49,250,000 | +4.8% |
No notes yet
Rating deterioration signals operational inconsistency. The 4.7 overall masks a 30 basis point decline over the last six months (4.6% → 4.3%), driven by recent staffing friction—two January 1-star reviews explicitly cite the same leasing agent (Pia) for responsiveness failures, directly contradicting five prior 5-star reviews praising her professionalism. The 88% five-star concentration (233/265) is inflated by leasing-stage enthusiasm; move-in and post-occupancy reviews (last two months) show higher variance, with a 3-star noting unit condition gaps despite responsive management. This pattern suggests strong initial service execution but weak sustained operations post-lease, undermining resident retention projections.
264 reviews total
Owner response · Feb 2026
Many, it is always a pleasure to receive a perfect score. Thank you for letting us know how we are doing! We are delighted that you are so pleased with your experience in our community.
We were out looking at apartments for my granddaughter and we met with Pia. I have to say that from the moment we walked through the door we really felt welcomed by Pia. She was very knowledgeable and friendly. This was first time we felt like she cared about what we were looking for instead of acting like she didn’t want to help us. We had looked at four other communities before we were sold on this property. I will very comfortable having my granddaughter living there.
Owner response · Jan 2026
Thank you for taking the time to share how impressed you were by your tour, Ricky! We are thrilled that Pia provided such helpful service, and we hope you will reach out if we may assist you further with the leasing process.
Even though I don’t live at this apartment complex, I’ve had the pleasure of interacting with Pia, and she made a lasting impression on me. From the moment I walked into the office, she was warm, welcoming, and extremely professional. Her positive attitude immediately stood out and made the entire experience comfortable and pleasant. Pia is incredibly kind and attentive. She takes the time to listen, answer questions thoroughly, and make sure people feel supported, no matter the reason for their visit. I never felt rushed or brushed off. Instead, she made sure everything was clear and handled with care. It’s easy to see that she truly enjoys helping others and takes pride in her role at the complex. What really sets Pia apart is her genuine personality. She creates an environment where people feel respected and valued. Even as someone who was just visiting or asking questions, she treated me with the same level of care and professionalism as a resident. That kind of consistency says a lot about her character and work ethic. Her communication is excellent, and she explains things in a way that’s easy to understand. She’s patient, friendly, and always willing to go the extra mile to help. You can tell she wants everyone who walks through the door to leave feeling informed and confident. First impressions matter, and Pia represents the apartment complex in the best possible way. She brings positivity, kindness, and professionalism into every interaction. Because of her, the property feels welcoming and well-managed before you even become a resident. Overall, Pia is a wonderful asset to this apartment community. Her helpful nature, warm personality, and strong customer service skills make her stand out. Anyone who interacts with her will immediately see how caring and dedicated she is, and the complex is lucky to have someone like Pia on their team.
Owner response · Jan 2026
What a wonderful review, Mia! We can't thank you enough for sharing such high praise for Pia. We are proud of the dedicated professionals who make our community a great place to live, and your 5-star applause validates our efforts. Thank you!
I moved in last week and my leasing agent, Pia was awful. Super disorganized and slow. Never answers phone or email
Owner response · Jan 2026
We have reviewed this feedback and are unable to locate any lease or residency under this reviewer’s name. If the leaseholder has outstanding questions or needs support, we encourage them to reach out so we can assist appropriately.
The leasing office staff is horrible. Never answers phone calls or emails. Particularly a lady named Pia, the worst.
Owner response · Jan 2026
We take concerns about responsiveness seriously. After reviewing our records, we do not have any lease, move-in, or resident account associated with this reviewer. We welcome the leaseholder to contact the office directly if follow-up or assistance is needed.
No notes yet
No notes yet