1000 E PLEASANT RUN RD, CEDAR HILL, TX, 751045513
$37,525,470
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 1.2% from prior year
🏘️ Community includes 2 DCAD parcels (392 total units)
The inverted 298% LTV against a $37.5M appraisal creates material refinance risk that overshadows otherwise stabilized operations. The $79.9M estimated sale price represents a significant valuation disconnect from appraisal, suggesting either embedded appreciation or a distressed capital event; missing loan-level details (maturity, current rates on the Berkadia adjustable note) obscure DSCR health and refinancing viability in a higher-rate environment. Operationally, the 12.5% vacancy spike and 2.8 Google rating indicate weakening tenant demand despite favorable supply (zero pipeline), while the rent-to-income profile ($1.5K/month targeting $87K+ households) targets only 50% of the 1-mile demographic, limiting absorption upside. Physical condition is solid—88.9% of units in excellent shape with a clear $3–5M value-add opportunity in kitchen standardization—but the car-dependent location (Walk Score 27) and $1.2–1.3M achievable rent ceiling cap long-term appreciation potential. Pass or move to watch-list pending debt term clarification; the capital structure risk and tepid demand backdrop outweigh the unit-level value-add play.
No notes yet
LEGACY OF CEDAR HILL. IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES. EXPAND YOUR TERRITORY IN CEDAR HILL
SO MUCH MORE LIFE AT LEGACY OF CEDAR HILL APARTMENTS & TOWNHOMES. The next adventure is never far away when you live in this lovely location. From season to season in Cedar Hill, Texas, you'll find an activity to match your mood. Whether it's hitting the links on a sunny weekend afternoon or grabbing a bite to eat with friends at your favorite restaurant around the corner after work, you'll have access to it all in this lively area. Shake things up and immerse yourself in the Cedar Hill area. This is your chance to explore, play, grow, wander, and experience when you find your new home at Legacy of Cedar Hill Apartments & Townhomes. Whether you're in the mood to be surrounded by nature or want to catch up with friends over dinner before getting some shopping done, this neighborhood truly has it all.
Physical Condition & Value-Add Positioning:
Legacy Apartment PH IIB presents as a well-maintained Class B property with strong bones but mixed renovation execution. 88.9% of units exhibit excellent condition with upgraded finishes, yet kitchen renovations cluster in two distinct waves (2010–2015 and 2016–2020), indicating partial rather than comprehensive unit updates. The 2016–2020 renovations feature mid-to-upper-tier finishes—quartz counters, stainless appliances, shaker cabinetry, subway tile—while earlier updates (2010–2015) retained builder-grade white appliances and honey oak tones, creating inconsistent unit positioning that may pressure rent growth.
Amenity Tier & Exterior:
Resort-style pool with rock features and mature landscaping, plus a well-equipped fitness center with modern finishes, position amenities above standard Class B. Clubhouse exterior shows contemporary 2010s aesthetics with professional maintenance; tan/beige stucco and stone finishes read dated relative to newer competitive supply.
Development Implications:
The 20-unit renovation gap (units with standard white appliances and early 2010s finishes) represents clear value-add: standardizing kitchens to 2018–2020 specifications across remaining units could unlock 3–5% NOI uplift without major capital expenditure.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Location Profile Misaligned with Rent Positioning
This Cedar Hill submarket carries a Walk Score of 27—quintessentially car-dependent—with minimal transit infrastructure and a Bike Score of 26, meaning tenant mobility relies almost entirely on personal vehicles. At $1.5M monthly blended rent, Legacy Apartment PH IIB is pricing for accessibility that the location fundamentally does not provide; comparable car-dependent suburban product in the Dallas metro typically achieves $1.2–1.3M rents unless positioned near major employment corridors (which Cedar Hill is not). The absence of transit data suggests negligible public transportation, further constraining appeal to transit-dependent renters and limiting the property's upside as the market evolves toward mixed-use, walkable density.
No notes yet
Pipeline Assessment: No Material Competitive Threat
Zero units in the pipeline (0.0% of 216-unit inventory) presents a favorable supply backdrop for this asset. With no active construction nearby and no issued permits, the property faces minimal near-term rent growth headwinds from new supply. However, the deteriorating vacancy trend in the submarket suggests broader demand softness—likely driven by macro factors rather than competitive delivery—warranting close monitoring of absorption dynamics independent of supply constraints.
No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles
No notes yet
Debt and Ownership Analysis: LEGACY APARTMENT PH IIB
The property carries $111.9M in aggregate debt against a $37.5M appraised value, representing 298.4% LTV—an inverted capital structure that suggests either significant unrealized appreciation embedded in the $79.9M estimated sale price or a distressed refinancing scenario. The current owner acquired the asset in March 2021 at $69.9M; the refinance via Wilmington Trust (ATTOM sourced, originated same date) at $55.95M indicates a take-out or assumption rather than new leverage, though missing rate, term, and maturity details obscure DSCR health and refinancing risk at current market conditions. Five transactions in 21 years and absentee individual ownership with a 5.1-year hold do not signal distress—the ownership chain shows no foreclosure deeds or deed-in-lieu transfers—but the inverted LTV and lack of loan-level specifics (maturity dates, current rates on the adjustable-rate Berkadia note) create material uncertainty around refinance viability and seller motivation if a capital event is imminent.
No notes yet
Valuation disconnect signals distressed asset or appraisal lag. The estimated sale price of $79.9M ($370K/unit) nearly doubles the appraised value of $37.5M, yet the 2.34% estimated cap rate sits 614 basis points below the 8.49% submarket benchmark—suggesting either significant unmodeled upside, recent capital investment not reflected in the appraisal, or market dislocation. The $8.7K NOI/unit is healthy relative to class positioning, but the 12.5% vacancy rate and 45% opex ratio compress returns; Dallas Class A/B comps typically run 3.5–5.5% caps on stabilized assets. The implied 4.98% cap rate (closer to market) indicates the NOI estimate may be conservative, though the $4.3K annual tax burden per unit warrants verification against comparable properties.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $55,950,000 (Mar 2021, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Legacy Apartment PH IIB is a 216-unit, two-story garden-style complex built in 2003 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior, delivering 208.8K SF of net leasable area. The asset is rated Excellent quality in Good condition, though amenity data is absent and Google rating is 2.8. Located in Cedar Hill with a Walk Score of 27, the property sits in a car-dependent suburban market with limited transit accessibility. Parking type and pet policy are not specified in available records.
No notes yet
Availability has spiked to 27 units (12.5% of stock) as of March 25, signaling meaningful lease-up pressure; the prior day shows zero availability with 2.6 weeks free concessions, indicating the property toggled between tight and loose market conditions within 24 hours. Three-bedroom units are tracking above submarket benchmarks ($1.7K-$2.0K asking vs. $1.7K benchmark), while one-bedrooms lag significantly ($1.2K average vs. $1.3K benchmark), suggesting demand concentration in larger units or pricing weakness in entry-level. No current concessions are recorded despite elevated vacancy, either reflecting a recent shift to market-rate leasing or data lag; the property's $1.5K blended asking rent tracks 0.5% above submarket growth, providing minimal pricing buffer.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
Min/avg/max asking rents from property website
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,980 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,980
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,785 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,785
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,785 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,785
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,775 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,775
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,735 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,735
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,720 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,720
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,660 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,660
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,152 | $1,585 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,585
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,087 | $1,580 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,580
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,082 | $1,575 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,575
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 984 | $1,540 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,540
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,087 | $1,530 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,530
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,087 | $1,530 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,530
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,087 | $1,530 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,530
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,087 | $1,530 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,530
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 984 | $1,490 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,490
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 984 | $1,460 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,460
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,087 | $1,455 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,455
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,087 | $1,430 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,430
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 984 | $1,415 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,415
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 967 | $1,410 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,410
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 684 | $1,235 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,235
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 740 | $1,215 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,215
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 684 | $1,170 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,170
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 740 | $1,155 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,155
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 684 | $1,085 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,085
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 684 | $1,085 | Active | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,085
|
|||||||
No notes yet
Rent-to-income misalignment signals narrow tenant base and execution risk. At $1.5K/month, the property targets households earning $87K+ (using standard 20% affordability threshold), yet the 1-mile radius—where immediate absorption occurs—shows only 50.0% of households exceed that threshold, with 14.3% earning under $25K. The 3-mile ring (25.1% renter concentration) further constrains demand density compared to the 5-mile radius (35.5% renters), indicating this location sits between urban core and suburban rentership patterns without capturing either. Income distribution skews affluent ($50.0% earn $100K+) in the immediate trade area, but that concentration inverts at 5 miles (37.2% earn $100K+), suggesting the property relies on outsize capture from a smaller, higher-income cohort rather than broad market appeal. Without employment or population growth data, the static income profile appears sufficient for stabilized operations but offers limited margin for competitive pressure or tenant quality deterioration.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 2 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
No notes yet
No notes yet
Current appraised value of $37.5M reflects minimal 1.2% annual appreciation, translating to $173.6K per unit—a sluggish trajectory for a 21-year-old asset in a Dallas market. Land represents just 1.3% of total value ($506.1K), indicating the property carries zero redevelopment optionality; any value recovery hinges entirely on operational performance. Single appraisal data point limits trend analysis, but the modest YoY move suggests the market has already priced in age-related depreciation and likely views this Phase IIB product as a stabilized, non-upside asset. Recommend pulling historical appraisals to confirm whether this reflects true flatness or a recent repricing event.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $37,525,470 | +1.2% |
No notes yet
No notes yet
No notes yet