JEFFERSON ON RIVERCHASE

600 S MACARTHUR BLVD, COPPELL (DALLAS CO), TX, 750196718

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Garden 386 units Built 1995 2 stories ★ 2.0 (122 reviews) 🚶 58 Somewhat Walkable 🚲 41 Somewhat Bikeable

$47,375,000

2025 Appraised Value

↑ 1.9% from prior year

Investment Overview: Jefferson on Riverchase

Red Flag: Acute operational and reputational deterioration makes this a pass despite favorable demographics. The 2.0 Google rating with 69.7% one-star reviews documenting systemic maintenance failures (A/C, plumbing, pest infestation), management unresponsiveness, and April 2024 fire/Dateline exposure signals operational distress that dwarfs market fundamentals. While the 1-mile demographic ($125.2K median income, 55.8% renter concentration) and zero pipeline support the submarket, the property's $47.4M valuation ($122.8K/unit) reflects a 1995-vintage Class C asset already underperforming comparable Dallas product—additional acquisition friction from lease-up headwinds and required capex for stabilization make returns unattractive. The deteriorating review trajectory (2.3 to 1.0 in six months) and pool condition photos confirm deferred maintenance is operational (not cosmetic), requiring substantial capex investment alongside management overhaul. Pass: Acquisition would demand significant operational remediation and capex deployment with high execution risk against already-compressed entry pricing.

AI overview · Updated 21 days ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

Jefferson on Riverchase is a Class C asset in fair-to-poor condition with minimal recent capital investment and evident deferred maintenance across amenities. The 1995-built, 386-unit property shows builder-grade finishes (cabinets, basic dome lighting, popcorn ceilings) with only isolated 2000s-era touch-ups; 13 of 25 photos rated fair or poor condition, including widespread cosmetic wear and scuffed paint. The community pool amenity—a key competitive factor in multifamily—is materially underperforming with consistent algae growth, murky water, and debris across all six documented shots, signaling either deferred maintenance or operational neglect that directly impacts resident satisfaction and leasing velocity. Unit-level renovation is sparse (2 upgraded units documented) while the majority remain original builder-grade, presenting significant value-add potential if capital deployment targets kitchen/bath standardization and exterior refresh.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

/

AI Analysis

Location Profile Mismatch Risk

Walk Score of 58 signals car-dependent positioning in a Dallas suburban market where transit infrastructure is sparse (no transit score available), limiting appeal to transit-reliant or car-free tenant segments. The weak bike score (41) further constrains alternative mobility, meaning tenant value proposition hinges entirely on nearby employment clusters and retail proximity—data points absent here. Without confirmed average rent, it's difficult to assess whether the Coppell location justifies market-rate positioning; suburban Dallas multifamily typically commands $1.3M–$1.5M premiums in highly walkable nodes (scores 70+), not car-dependent submarkets. Lease comps and specific distance-to-employment metrics are critical to validate whether 386 units can sustain occupancy and pricing at this location.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago
Distance Name Category
📍 15.3 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Zero near-term supply threat, but deteriorating submarket fundamentals present larger concern. The 0.0% pipeline ratio and zero nearby construction projects eliminate typical new-supply headwinds to occupancy and rental growth. However, the deteriorating vacancy trend suggests demand-side weakness already outpacing existing supply dynamics—new competition would be secondary to addressing underlying absorption challenges in this submarket.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago
🏗️ 0 permits within 3 mi
0% pipeline

No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles

Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
Sale $/Unit
Value YoY
+1.9%
Implied Cap Rate
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
Est. Vacancy
Submarket Vac.
5.2%
Eff. Gross Income
OpEx Ratio
45%
Est. NOI
NOI/Unit

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
$3,068/yr
Est. DSCR

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
5.92%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$198,542
Rent/SF
$1.78/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

Jefferson on Riverchase is a 386-unit garden-style apartment built in 1995 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior, currently in good condition with excellent quality ratings. The property spans 350K SF across two stories in Coppell (Dallas County), placing it in a suburban corridor with moderate walkability (Walk Score 58). No data on parking configuration, included utilities, pet policy, or unit finishes is available in the system.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

Property Details

Account #
180023900A0010000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Garden
Construction
D-WOOD FRAME
Quality
EXCELLENT
Condition
GOOD
Stories
2
Gross Building Area
350,002 SF
Net Leasable Area
350,002 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
December 24, 1997
Place ID
ChIJUyxkfdwoTIYRoqNT1xJGn1g
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
about 2 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
HOUTEX USA INC
Mailing Address
% THE VININGS
RICHARDSON, TEXAS 750824320
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

Income-rent alignment is healthy but skews affluent; property benefits from dense renter concentration in an upscale submarket. The 1-mile median household income of $125.2K supports the property's positioning, with affordability ratios (17.9–19.4% across radii) well below stress thresholds. However, the income distribution reveals a bifurcated market: 56.0% of 1-mile households earn $100K+, suggesting this is upper-middle-class renter demand rather than workforce housing. The 3-mile radius shows stronger renter concentration (55.8%) and similarly wealthy profiles ($121.6K median), indicating sustained local demand depth; at 5 miles, both decline modestly (54.1% renters, $111.5K median), typical suburban ring attenuation. The property's location in an affluent urban core limits downside risk but may constrain upside growth if income growth stalls—monitor whether $100K+ cohort expansion continues or plateaus.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

1-Mile Radius

Population
10,742
Households
4,518
Avg Household Size
2.45
Median HH Income
$125,233
Median Home Value
$496,767
Median Rent
$1,869
% Renter Occupied
51.7%
Affordability
17.9% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

3-Mile Radius

Population
73,078
Households
29,817
Avg Household Size
2.5
Median HH Income
$121,569
Median Home Value
$461,768
Median Rent
$1,893
% Renter Occupied
55.8%
Affordability
18.7% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
218,226
Households
86,166
Avg Household Size
2.6
Median HH Income
$111,515
Median Home Value
$403,874
Median Rent
$1,804
% Renter Occupied
54.1%
Affordability
19.4% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 2 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Appraisal Summary:

Jefferson on Riverchase carries a $47.4M valuation ($122.8K per unit) based on a single 2025 appraisal with minimal 1.9% YoY appreciation, suggesting a mature asset in a flat or moderately softening market. The improvement-to-land ratio (93.2% / 6.8%) indicates limited redevelopment optionality—this is a hold-and-operate play, not a land play. Without historical appraisal data, trend analysis is incomplete, but the per-unit basis appears below prime Dallas metro product (typically $130K–$145K for newer construction), signaling either secondary market positioning, aging stock from 1995 vintage, or underperformance relative to comps.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $47,375,000 +1.9%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Investment thesis severely undermined. The 2.0 overall rating masks catastrophic deterioration—average rating plummeted from 2.3 to 1.0 over the past six months, with 69.7% of all reviews (85/122) rating the property 1-star. Recurring complaints center on deferred maintenance (A/C failures, plumbing, structural leaks), pest infestation (rodents, insects), management unresponsiveness to work orders, and safety issues (theft, security gaps), with a April 2024 kitchen fire and subsequent Dateline episode exposure creating reputational damage. The five recent 5-star reviews appear generic and inconsistent with substantive negative testimony spanning 12+ months, suggesting either fake reviews or isolated satisfied tenants amid systemic operational failure. This property signals acute asset deterioration and management dysfunction that would require significant capex and operational restructuring to stabilize rent roll—current review profile indicates high churn risk and lease-up headwinds that materially compromise acquisition returns.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

Rating Distribution

5★
24 (20%)
4★
5 (4%)
3★
5 (4%)
2★
3 (2%)
1★
85 (70%)

122 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

Natasha Page ★☆☆☆☆ Local Guide Dec 2025

⭐ Honest Review – Please Read Before Leasing

I was a resident at Riverchase Apartment Homes when a kitchen fire occurred in April 2024. After the fire, management locked me out of my apartment without giving me proper notice or written documentation. I had to involve the constable just to be allowed back in. During that time, I personally cleaned the entire unit, documented everything on video, and took care of the smoke and water damage myself.

Despite this, months later (October), I was suddenly hit with over $11,000 in charges—with no itemized breakdown provided within 30 days, as required by Texas Property Code. I’ve sent multiple written disputes with proof, yet received no resolution.

I also submitted written notice requesting a 12-month lease renewal, but they changed my lease to month-to-month without consent, which increased my rent without warning—another lease violation.

Their actions appear to be retaliatory, and I’ve already filed formal complaints with HUD, TDHCA, and legal counsel. I’m sharing this to inform others of my experience and encourage anyone else affected to document everything and know your rights.

Lloyd Ndlovu ★☆☆☆☆ Nov 2025
Jesus godoy ★★★★★ Local Guide Sep 2025
B Medina-Benavides ★☆☆☆☆ Local Guide Aug 2025

Just saw the Dateline episode...scary place to live.

Emily McBay ★☆☆☆☆ Aug 2025

If I could leave a negative star rating I would. Do NOT lease here. I moved in July 15th and I have sent at least 10 emails have made at least 10 to 15 calls to management about numerous things that are not working or broken in my apartment which should’ve been caught when they were getting it ready for move-in. I get no response anytime I call the office if I even get in touch with someone they’re rude. They say they’re gonna get it taken care of. They never do. I can’t seem to get the name and phone number of the property management company.Absolutely stay away. I called and told him I wanted to just break my lease and yet they wanna charge me everything under the sun to do that even though they cannot fix anything in my apartment. Stay away stay away. Beware this is a slumlord.

Showing 5 of 122 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet