15678 KNOLL TRAIL DR, DALLAS, TX, 752487010
$16,150,000
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 0.0% from prior year
This stabilized 1990-vintage asset trades at a compressed 5.63% cap rate with operational execution risk and limited upside mechanics—a likely pass unless pursuing low-yield portfolio ballast. The $16.15M appraised value ($141.7K/unit) reflects a mature operating property with no redevelopment optionality (10.1% land value, 89.9% improvements), priced fairly relative to the 6.65% Dallas submarket average but offering no value arbitrage. Critical refinancing ambiguity—a matured Deutsche Bank loan (June 2015, nine years ago) and an unspecified $325M KeyBank revolving facility—requires immediate debt clarification before proceeding; ownership stability (MERCE PARTNERS LLC, 14.4 years) suggests a hold rather than distressed asset, but the financing opacity clouds true leverage and exit capacity.
Demand tailwinds are geographically constrained: 74.5% renter concentration within a 1-mile radius, skewed toward high-income professionals ($100K+ = 40.6% vs. 36.5% at 5 miles), creates strong local fill but minimal tenant elasticity during downturns and vulnerability to outer-ring competition. Rental performance undermines stabilization narrative—1BR units price 10% below market ($1.26K vs. $1.40K), with wild intra-month oscillations ($1.05K–$1.44K) and no rate discipline evident. The extreme unit mix (50% one-bedroom, only 1 studio and 1 two-bedroom) compounds leasing inflexibility; operational delivery gaps (Google review pattern: strong leasing, weak post-occupancy maintenance) and Class C finishes (dated fixtures, 25% peeling paint sampled) suggest near-term capex drag.
Recommendation: Watch list or pass. The property checks stabilized-hold boxes (4.4% vacancy, healthy 45% opex ratio, no direct pipeline competition) but lacks the return profile, operational momentum, or structural arbitrage to justify acquisition at prevailing cap rates. Pursue only if cost-of-capital and hold-period align with sub-6% yield expectations, or if debt restructuring reveals material undervaluation.
No notes yet
Newly Renovated Apartment Homes
Newly renovated studio, 1, and 2 bedroom apartments in Far North Dallas with modern features including stainless steel appliances, quartz countertops, hardwood-style flooring, spacious closets, vaulted ceilings, full-size washers and dryers, and private patios or balconies.
Vue at Knoll Trail presents a Class C value-add opportunity with material renovation upside. The 1990-built, 114-unit property exhibits builder-grade finishes across sampled units with inconsistent maintenance—25% of observed interiors show poor paint condition or active peeling, while lighting remains dated (basic dome fixtures predominant). The sample size (4 photos) limits confidence, but the absence of kitchen/bath detail descriptions and lack of any modern finishes suggest original or minimally updated units rather than selective renovation. The mixed condition flags deferred maintenance issues that, if representative, justify a discount to recent comps and support a kitchen/bath value-add thesis.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Location Profile Undermines Rent Position
VUE AT KNOLL TRAIL's walkability metrics—Walk 57, Transit 44, Bike 48—position it firmly in car-dependent territory, limiting appeal to transit-reliant renters and constraining long-term demand elasticity. At $1,263/month, the property commands mid-market pricing despite lacking the urban proximity or amenity density that typically justifies premium positioning. The weak transit score (44) is particularly problematic for a 114-unit community competing in Dallas's multifamily market, where comparable suburban locations increasingly offer superior walkability or direct employment center access. Without downtown adjacency or premium amenity clustering data, this asset appears positioned as a secondary-market, workforce-housing play where rent growth will track household income rather than neighborhood gentrification.
No notes yet
The 1-unit pipeline represents negligible supply pressure at 0.88% of Vue at Knoll Trail's 114-unit inventory, but the deteriorating submarket vacancy trend warrants caution on rent growth assumptions. The single nearby permit (8230 Frankford Rd, in Inspection Phase as of Feb 2025) appears too small to materially compete for the same tenant base. However, the submarket's worsening fundamentals suggest either broader oversupply dynamics or demand weakness that could constrain pricing power regardless of direct competition at this specific property.
| Distance | Address | Description | Status | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.7 mi | 8230 FRANKFORD RD | NEW CONSTRUCTION MFD. 125 UNITS SENIOR LIVING. | Inspection Phase | Feb 24, 2025 |
No notes yet
Critical refinancing risk: The Deutsche Bank loan ($3.75M) matured in June 2015, nine years ago, indicating either a payment arrangement, silent default, or data corruption—immediate verification required. The KeyBank revolving facility ($325M notional, adjustable-rate, originated 2015) lacks maturity and rate data, obscuring true leverage and refinancing exposure. At $2.85M per unit in appraised value, debt-to-value is opaque but potentially elevated if the $325M REV facility represents drawn capital.
Ownership stability (MERCE PARTNERS LLC holding 14.4 years, non-absentee) and modest transaction frequency (3 total) suggest a stabilized hold rather than a flip strategy, but the 2015 financing event coinciding with a Deed of Trust without clear refinancing terms signals potential distress or special servicing. The 2011 acquisition at $6.0M ($59.8K/unit) against current appraised value of $14.2M indicates substantial appreciation, though absent DSCR and current NOI, exit capacity and debt serviceability remain unquantifiable.
No notes yet
Vue at Knoll Trail trades at a 5.63% implied cap rate—102 basis points below the 6.65% Dallas submarket average—signaling stabilized pricing rather than value-add positioning. NOI per unit of $7,970 trails the submarket benchmark of $9,541 (implied from $143.5K price/unit at 6.65% cap), indicating either operational drag or renter-quality mismatch relative to comps. The 45% opex ratio is healthy and suggests management efficiency isn't the issue; the 4.4% vacancy and $3,542/unit tax burden are both reasonable for a 1990-vintage Class B asset. The $16.15M appraised value versus implied value of ~$16.1M at blended cap rates shows no material appraisal disconnect, but the 114-unit scale and compressed cap rate argue this property prices as a stabilized hold—not a typical acquisition target unless the buyer is seeking yield compression arbitrage or long-hold portfolio ballast.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $325,000,000 (Sep 2015, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Vue at Knoll Trail is a 114-unit, 3-story garden-style apartment community built in 1990 with recent renovations addressing finishes across studio, 1, and 2-bedroom floor plans. The 78.8K SF property (74.4K NLA) features in-unit W/D, quartz countertops, stainless appliances, and private patios/balconies in good physical condition with a 4.3 Google rating. Located in Far North Dallas with a walk score of 57, the property allows up to 2 pets per unit with a $400 one-time fee and $30/month pet rent per animal, subject to breed restrictions. Parking type not specified; utilities split with residents responsible for all bills.
No notes yet
Vue at Knoll Trail is pricing 1BR units 10% below market benchmarks ($1.26K vs. $1.40K), suggesting either below-market positioning or downward pressure on achievable rents. Recent leasing activity (20 events over six weeks, ending 4/6/26) shows high volatility in 1BR pricing, ranging $1.05K–$1.44K with no discernible upward or downward trend—rents are oscillating within a $390 band rather than trending directionally. No active concessions are reported, yet the 5 remaining availabilities (4.4% of 114 units) and wide pricing dispersion indicate the property may be struggling to establish rate discipline or fill units at higher price points. The single-bedroom-only data set limits comparison across unit types, masking whether underperformance is portfolio-wide or unit-specific.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BR | 1 | 847 | $1,443 | Active | Apr 6 | 1 | |
|
Mar $1,372
→
Apr $1,443
(↑5.2%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,302 | Active | Apr 6 | 1 | |
|
Mar $1,302
→
Apr $1,302
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,251 | Active | Apr 4 | 1 | |
|
Dec $1,167
→
Jan $1,149
→
Jan $1,149
→
Feb $1,142
→
Feb $1,142
→
Mar $1,150
→
Mar $1,251
→
Apr $1,251
(↑7.2%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,213 | Active | Apr 6 | 1 | |
|
Mar $1,213
→
Apr $1,213
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 484 | $1,107 | Active | Apr 6 | 1 | |
|
May $917
→
Mar $1,051
→
Mar $1,107
→
Apr $1,107
(↑20.7%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 4101 | 2BR | 2 | 917 | $1,585 | Inactive | May 14 | 365 |
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,410 | Inactive | Sep 21 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,410
|
|||||||
| Apt 1310 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,330 | Inactive | Jan 11 | 210 |
| 1BR | 1 | 484 | $1,310 | Inactive | Sep 26 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,310
|
|||||||
| Apt 1111 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,300 | Inactive | Jun 21 | 365 |
| — | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,287 | Inactive | Apr 12 | 118 |
| 1BR | 1 | 847 | $1,277 | Inactive | May 29 | 1 | |
|
May $1,196
→
May $1,277
(↑6.8%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,271 | Inactive | Dec 21 | 1 | |
|
Dec $1,271
→
Dec $1,271
→
Dec $1,271
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 1208 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,270 | Inactive | Apr 26 | 56 |
| Apt 3201 | 1BR | 1 | 736 | $1,270 | Inactive | Apr 27 | 34 |
| Apt 2110 | 1BR | 1 | 736 | $1,265 | Inactive | Jan 13 | 208 |
| Apt 1103 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,240 | Inactive | Apr 27 | 17 |
| Apt 1110 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,240 | Inactive | Apr 7 | 19 |
| Apt 1101 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,235 | Inactive | Jan 11 | 210 |
| Apt 1315 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,220 | Inactive | Mar 23 | 53 |
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,213 | Inactive | Apr 1 | 1 | |
|
Feb $1,135
→
Mar $1,143
→
Mar $1,143
→
Mar $1,153
→
Apr $1,213
(↑6.9%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 2208 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,210 | Inactive | Jan 24 | 197 |
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,185 | Inactive | Mar 14 | 1 | |
|
Jan $1,208
→
Feb $1,208
→
Feb $1,176
→
Feb $1,185
→
Mar $1,185
→
Mar $1,185
(↓1.9%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,168 | Inactive | Dec 21 | 1 | |
|
Dec $1,168
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,167 | Inactive | Apr 3 | 1 | |
|
Feb $1,087
→
Feb $1,087
→
Mar $1,095
→
Mar $1,095
→
Mar $1,106
→
Mar $1,106
→
Apr $1,167
(↑7.4%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,156 | Inactive | Mar 28 | 1 | |
|
Jan $1,144
→
Jan $1,144
→
Feb $1,144
→
Feb $1,137
→
Feb $1,137
→
Feb $1,137
→
Mar $1,156
(↑1.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,151 | Inactive | Mar 28 | 1 | |
|
Jan $1,139
→
Jan $1,139
→
Feb $1,139
→
Feb $1,139
→
Feb $1,132
→
Feb $1,132
→
Mar $1,140
→
Mar $1,151
→
Mar $1,151
(↑1.1%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 1104 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,140 | Inactive | Nov 17 | 69 |
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,136 | Inactive | Feb 11 | 1 | |
|
Jun $1,114
→
Jun $1,111
→
Jan $1,135
→
Feb $1,136
→
Feb $1,136
(↑2.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,136 | Inactive | Feb 10 | 1 | |
|
Jan $1,135
→
Jan $1,136
→
Feb $1,136
→
Feb $1,136
(↑0.1%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 3310 | 1BR | 1 | 736 | $1,135 | Inactive | Jul 16 | 18 |
| Apt 2302 | 1BR | 1 | 484 | $1,135 | Inactive | Apr 26 | 17 |
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,131 | Inactive | Feb 11 | 1 | |
|
Dec $1,119
→
Jan $1,130
→
Jan $1,130
→
Feb $1,131
→
Feb $1,131
(↑1.1%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,131 | Inactive | Feb 8 | 1 | |
|
Jan $1,131
→
Jan $1,131
→
Feb $1,131
→
Feb $1,131
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 2210 | 1BR | 1 | 736 | $1,130 | Inactive | Aug 31 | 1 |
| Apt 2207 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,125 | Inactive | Mar 12 | 652 |
| Apt 2105 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,120 | Inactive | Jan 26 | 26 |
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,117 | Inactive | Jun 18 | 1 | |
|
Jun $1,117
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,116 | Inactive | Dec 20 | 1 | |
|
Dec $1,116
|
|||||||
| Apt 2103 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,110 | Inactive | Jun 1 | 64 |
| Apt 3306 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,108 | Inactive | Nov 3 | 83 |
| Apt 3207 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,100 | Inactive | Sep 18 | 1 |
| Apt 2305 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,100 | Inactive | Sep 11 | 1 |
| Apt 1204 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,100 | Inactive | Sep 8 | 1 |
| Apt 3210 | 1BR | 1 | 736 | $1,095 | Inactive | Aug 22 | 1 |
| Apt 2107 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,095 | Inactive | Dec 6 | 18 |
| Apt 3203 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,085 | Inactive | Nov 2 | 84 |
| Apt 2108 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,080 | Inactive | Apr 27 | 95 |
| Apt 3107 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,070 | Inactive | Aug 23 | 1 |
| Apt 2106 | 1BR | 1 | 675 | $1,070 | Inactive | May 15 | 79 |
| Apt 1102 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,065 | Inactive | Aug 23 | 1 |
| Apt 1301 | 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,060 | Inactive | Jul 17 | 11 |
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,055 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,410
→
Oct $1,055
(↓25.2%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 626 | $1,055 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,055
|
|||||||
| Studio | 1 | 464 | $1,046 | Inactive | Feb 23 | 1 | |
|
Jan $1,062
→
Jan $1,062
→
Jan $1,062
→
Feb $1,046
→
Feb $1,046
→
Feb $1,046
(↓1.5%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 3109 | 1BR | 1 | 484 | $1,015 | Inactive | Jun 21 | 43 |
| Apt 2209 | 1BR | 1 | 484 | $1,010 | Inactive | Jan 25 | 27 |
| Apt 2102 | 1BR | 1 | 484 | $1,005 | Inactive | May 17 | 79 |
| 1BR | 1 | 675 | $978 | Inactive | Dec 31 | 1 | |
|
Dec $978
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 484 | $922 | Inactive | May 12 | 1 | |
|
May $922
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 484 | $917 | Inactive | May 15 | 1 | |
|
May $917
|
|||||||
No notes yet
Affordability and demand concentration heavily skew toward the immediate 1-mile radius. The $1.263K monthly rent consumes 22.9% of 1-mile median HHI ($88.3K), while the 3-mile and 5-mile ratios improve to 20.7% and 20.4%—signaling the property is priced for its tight trade area. The 74.5% renter concentration within 1 mile is 6.3 percentage points above the 5-mile ring, indicating strong local rental demand but limited geographic flexibility; leasing depends on near-term population stability rather than regional migration.
Income distribution reveals an affluent renter profile with limited workforce housing penetration. Combined high-income earners ($100K+) represent 40.6% within 1 mile versus 36.5% at 5 miles, while sub-$50K households represent only 22.3% locally. This skew reduces downside protection during economic stress but supports premium positioning if employment-dependent; workforce renters chasing affordability will likely absorb competing supply in outer rings.
The 1-mile radius shows architectural weakness: median home value of $331.9K paired with 74.5% renter occupancy suggests ownership-averse demographics or rental-by-choice behavior. With avg household size of 1.82 and elevated renter concentration, the property likely captures single/dual-professional urbanists rather than families—a narrower, more competitive segment than broader suburban 5-mile (2.34 HH size, 57.3% renter).
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 4 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
Unit Mix Analysis – VUE AT KNOLL TRAIL
The property is severely concentrated in one-bedroom units (50.0% of total stock, 57 units), with negligible diversity—only 1 studio and 1 two-bedroom across 114 units. This extreme specialization limits demographic flexibility and creates leasing risk; any softening in the one-bedroom segment (young professional rentals) leaves minimal absorption from family-oriented or downsizer cohorts. The $1.3K average rent on 661 sf yields $1.91/sf annually, a thin margin that offers limited upside and pricing power if occupancy pressures mount in a market downturn.
Estimated from 59 listed units (51.8% of 114 total)
No notes yet
Pet-friendly community with no weight limits. Maximum of 2 pets per apartment home. One-time fee of $400 and monthly pet rent of $30 per pet. Breed restrictions apply.
No notes yet
Vue at Knoll Trail shows flat valuation with minimal redevelopment optionality. The single 2025 appraisal of $16.15M implies $141.7K per unit—a benchmark figure without historical context, but the 10.1% land-to-total ratio ($1.64M) signals limited tear-down economics. With 1990 vintage and $14.51M in improvements (89.9% of value), this asset is valued primarily as a stabilized operating property rather than for land play; any repositioning would need to preserve the existing structure or accept significant write-down on remaining useful life.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $16,150,000 | +0.0% |
No notes yet
VUE AT KNOLL TRAIL — Google Review Analysis
Rating deterioration masks operational inconsistency: the 4.3 overall average masks a bimodal distribution with 67 five-star and 12 one-star reviews (68.4% and 12.2% respectively), while the trailing 6-month average of 4.4 versus prior 6-month 4.5 signals marginal decline. Two discrete operational failures emerge in one-star reviews—smoking enforcement (December 2025) and maintenance protocol failures where crews leave apartments dirty post-service (September 2025)—suggesting systemic gaps in resident rule compliance and post-maintenance accountability. Leasing staff performance (Isabella, Amber) consistently drives five-star sentiment and likely inflates overall ratings through positive move-in experiences, but this masks downstream property management and maintenance execution issues that erode resident satisfaction post-lease. The pattern indicates strong sales funnel conversion but weak operational delivery, undermining lease renewal and resident lifetime value.
85 reviews total
Isabella and Amber have both been very helpful and professional. They patiently answered all of my questions and made sure my concerns were properly addressed. I really appreciate their support and responsiveness throughout the process.
Owner response · Feb 2026
Hi Vicki, Our team loves to see we’ve made your time here excellent! Thank you for taking the time out to share your experience of our community with us!
Owner response · Feb 2026
Hi, Munwar. We appreciate the rating, and are glad we could provide you with a positive experience!
People break the rules and smoke inside their apartments. Complaining & writing notes and placing them on the tenants door doesn’t help. They are strict on everything which is good EXCEPT the smoking. Unfortunately this is a deal breaker for me. I dont feel comfortable in my own home having to smell someone else’s cigarette smoke seeping thru the walls/plumping.
Owner response · Jan 2026
Hello Jessica, We’re sorry to hear about your experience and understand how disruptive secondhand smoke can be. We strive to enforce all community policies consistently, and your concerns have been noted. Please contact our management office directly so we can review this situation and address it appropriately. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
Loved the property! Clean, well-maintained, and the team was incredibly helpful.
Owner response · Dec 2025
Hello, thank you for taking the time to share your experience with us; we appreciate your feedback! If you have any further questions, comments, or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out!
The Vue at Knoll Trail is a great place to live and the staff in the leasing office are great. They handled everything correctly and in order just for me to be moved into my apartment quickly as possible. I would like highlight one particular leasing agent that helped me tremendously throughout getting my apartment and that is Ms.Isabella. She has great customer service and she does everything with a smile. What a great experience in all.
Owner response · Nov 2025
Hi, thank you for your kind review; we are happy to pass along your comments to the team here at Vue at Knoll Trail Apartments! Thank you again, and have a fantastic day!
No notes yet
No notes yet