8501 OLD HICKORY TRL, DALLAS, TX, 752373804
$23,000,000
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 0.0% from prior year
This is a distressed refinancing situation masquerading as a stabilized asset—material near-term liquidity risk outweighs operational upside. The property carries $35.6M debt against a $23.0M appraisal (154.8% LTV) with a $20.35M adjustable-rate tranche maturing August 2029, leaving minimal equity cushion (9.2%) in a higher-rate environment where refi DSCR will compress below lender thresholds. The $29.1M estimated sale price reflects 26.4% appreciation above appraisal, suggesting the current ownership (Corsair Creekside, 5.7-year hold) is anchored to a deal exit before maturity rather than operational hold strategy, particularly given the 2019 tax deed distress history in the ownership chain.
Market fundamentals are structurally weak: the immediate 1-mile submarket shows 38.9% rent-to-income stress (median HHI $39.4K vs. $1,421 rent), while 41.5% of households earn under $25K, creating pricing durability through workforce captivity rather than demand strength—a distinction that matters when employment volatility is high. The property itself is bleeding operational credibility despite surface metrics: 280 units generate only $9.2K NOI per unit (3–5% below Class B benchmarks), Google reviews document systemic 2–5 month maintenance backlogs and unresolved work orders despite a 4.4 recent rating, and the 3BR unit mix underperforms submarket rent by 22.6%, suggesting either deferred capex consequences or weak leasing execution.
The asset's walkability and transit positioning (scores of 34 and 42, respectively) fundamentally misalign with its $1.4K rent targeting middle-market renters who prioritize urban amenities, while the 2003 construction with scattered 2010–2020 unit renovations offers only incremental value-add potential—not repositioning upside.
Pass. The debt maturity cliff, equity-depleted capital structure, and operationally deteriorating property (masked by leasing staff strength) combine to create refinancing risk that PE ownership cannot resolve without significant value destruction or a buyer-friendly exit window that closed 18–24 months ago.
No notes yet
A community that offers apartment homes for restricted income residents. Residents are subject to Maximum Allowable Household Incomes.
Class B asset with tired original interiors and inconsistent renovation history limiting near-term value creation. The 280-unit 2003 property shows builder-grade honey oak cabinets and laminate countertops in its sampled units, with renovation dates scattered across 2010–2020 rather than a cohesive repositioning strategy. Paint condition is mixed (13 fresh vs. 4 scuffed/1 peeling), and flooring splits between vinyl plank and carpet, indicating piecemeal unit-level updates rather than a systematic capital plan. The resort-style pool and recently upgraded clubhouse/fitness center (2015–2020 era) are amenity strengths, but dated kitchen and bath finishes across the building stock represent clear value-add opportunity if a 60–70 unit annual renovation cadence is feasible.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Location Profile Severely Misaligned with Rent Position
Walk score of 34 and transit score of 42 position this property in a decidedly car-dependent suburban corridor, yet $1.4K monthly rent suggests positioning toward middle-market renters who typically prioritize walkability and transit access. The "somewhat bikeable" rating (35) offers minimal alternative commute optionality. Without amenity density data or employment center proximity, the risk is clear: the property's rent structure assumes urban/transit-oriented demand in a location that fundamentally cannot deliver it, creating downward pressure on leasing velocity and pricing power unless the submarket's job centers are immediately adjacent.
No notes yet
The 1.07% pipeline-to-inventory ratio presents minimal direct supply pressure on this 280-unit asset, with only 3 units under construction in the immediate area. However, the deteriorating submarket vacancy trend suggests broader competitive headwinds unrelated to new supply—likely driven by existing market oversaturation or demand weakness rather than imminent deliveries. The three permits are geographically dispersed (Hampton Rd, Westmoreland Rd, Corral Dr) and early-stage (one in document review, one requiring revisions), indicating no material threat from near-term deliveries. This asset's rent growth risk stems from existing market conditions rather than pipeline competition.
| Distance | Address | Description | Status | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 mi | 7808 S HAMPTON RD | QTEAM MEETING TBD New Construction of 36 Townhomes on a M... | Document Received | Mar 09, 2026 |
| 2.1 mi | 6400 S WESTMORELAND RD | QTEAM MEETING 2.10.2026 (All Day) 216-unit senior living ... | Plan Review | Dec 22, 2025 |
| 2.4 mi | 4324 CORRAL DR | New apartments | Revisions Required | Jul 26, 2022 |
No notes yet
Debt Structure & Refinancing Risk
The property carries $35.6M in active debt against a $23.0M appraised value—a 154.8% LTV that signals either aggressive leverage at acquisition or significant value deterioration since origination. The Newmark adjustable-rate tranche ($20.35M) matures in August 2029, creating material refinancing risk in a higher-rate environment; at current spreads, refi rates would likely compress DSCR below acceptable thresholds. The FHA loan ($15.2M at 3.28%, maturing 2052) provides ballast but represents an older vintage unlikely to be assumable on sale.
Ownership & Seller Motivation
Corsair Creekside acquired the asset in July 2020 at the tail of a three-transaction chain spanning 2017–2020, including a tax deed intervention by AT Owner 6 LP in 2019—a distress flag. The current 5.7-year hold under absentee corporate ownership, combined with debt-to-value levels that leave minimal equity cushion (9.2% equity), suggests either a long-term hold strategy or a property locked into refinancing timing. The $29.1M estimated sale price implies 26.4% appreciation from appraised value; if achievable, a sale would resolve maturity risk before the 2029 deadline.
No notes yet
Providence on the Park is priced 26.4% below appraised value at an 8.87% cap rate, signaling distressed or motivated seller positioning rather than market-rate stabilized. The $9.2K NOI per unit runs 3–5% below Class B Dallas benchmarks, while the 45% opex ratio is healthy and supports the 5.17x DSCR. The 234 bps spread between estimated cap rate (8.87%) and implied cap rate (11.21%) reflects the appraisal disconnect—the market is pricing this at $29.1M versus the $23M appraisal, suggesting either appraisal obsolescence or the seller is anchored to stale valuations. At $103.8K/unit against $105.6K submarket median, this is a slight discount masking stronger underlying cap rate compression; value creation likely depends on NOI expansion rather than multiple re-rating.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $20,350,000 (Aug 2019, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Providence on the Park is a 280-unit, two-story garden-style complex built in 2003 with brick exterior and wood-frame construction, delivering 302.4K SF of net leasable area in good condition. The property operates as income-restricted housing with maximum allowable household income requirements. Located in Dallas with a walk score of 34, the asset lacks disclosed parking details and amenities data; no utilities are specified as rent-inclusive, and pet policy is undocumented.
No notes yet
Providence on the Park is underperforming 2BR and significantly underperforming 3BR relative to submarket benchmarks—asking $1,558 vs. $1,530 for 2BR (within market) but only $1,330 vs. $1,720 for 3BR, a 22.6% discount that suggests either unit quality issues, amenity gaps, or weak recent leasing velocity on larger units. With 19 of 280 units available (6.8% occupancy gap) and only 5 active listings, the property is either in early lease-up or experiencing retention challenges; the vague concession offer ("Specials Available") without quantified rent relief indicates either competitive positioning weakness or recent concession elimination. Recent lease events cluster heavily on 3BR units at the low end, confirming 3BR is the problem child driving overall performance drag.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
Min/avg/max asking rents from property website
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BR | 2 | 960 | $1,558 | Active | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,558
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 960 | $1,558 | Active | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,558
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,120 | $1,330 | Active | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,330
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,120 | $1,330 | Active | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,330
|
|||||||
| 3BR | 2 | 1,120 | $1,330 | Active | Mar 18 | 20 | |
|
Mar $1,330
|
|||||||
No notes yet
Affordability risk in immediate submarket masks broader opportunity. The 1-mile radius shows severe rent stress: median household income of $39.4K against $1,421 monthly rent produces a 38.9% affordability ratio, with 41.5% of households earning under $25K. However, the 3-mile ring ($57.6K median income, 30.4% ratio) and 5-mile ring ($68.9K median income, 26.8% ratio) demonstrate materially stronger fundamentals. The 90.5% renter concentration at 1-mile signals either tight rental supply or income-constrained residents with limited purchase capacity—both support lease pricing durability, though turnover and credit quality merit scrutiny. Income distribution skews heavily toward workforce ($48K combined under $50K at 1-mile) in the immediate trade area, suggesting this asset targets price-sensitive renters rather than affluent metros; sustainability depends on local job stability and wage growth in lower-income cohorts, not top-end income appreciation.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 2 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
No notes yet
No notes yet
Appraisal History – Providence on the Park
The property holds a flat valuation at $23.0M as of 2025 with zero year-over-year movement, suggesting market equilibrium or appraisal stasis rather than growth momentum. Per-unit value stands at $82.1K, with improvements comprising 90.1% of total value against a modest 9.8% land allocation—typical for a 22-year-old stabilized asset with limited redevelopment upside. The thin land-to-total ratio ($2.2M on $23.0M base) indicates the capital stack is locked into existing structure rather than land optionality, reducing flexibility for major repositioning or value-add through intensification.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $23,000,000 | +0.0% |
No notes yet
Rating trajectory masks deteriorating maintenance execution. While the 3.8 overall rating improved to 4.4 in the last six months, this reflects staff sentiment rather than operational quality—recent 5-star reviews lack detail, whereas substantive 1-star reviews (43 instances) consistently cite maintenance response failures: work orders unresolved for 2-5 months, incomplete repairs, and delayed replacements on critical units. The leasing team (Sandra, Courtney) earns repeated praise, creating a bifurcated perception where move-in experience obscures systemic maintenance breakdown. Security concerns and facility degradation noted in longer-tenure resident reviews (e.g., "bullets in the walls") signal property-level control loss that 280-unit scale should prevent, undercutting underwriting assumptions around operational stability and resident retention risk.
213 reviews total
Owner response · Feb 2026
Hey Kennon! Thank you for your 5 star review. We appreciate you and your business. Providence on the Park, Community Director
The maintenance suck. They do not come fix your apartment when you put in a work order I put in seven work orders and nobody have not showed up yet to fix anything that need to be fixed in my apartment.
Owner response · Feb 2026
Hi Kinesha, We’re very concerned to hear about your experience and truly sorry for the frustration this has caused. This does not reflect the standards we strive to provide, especially when it comes to responding to maintenance requests in a timely manner. We understand how upsetting it must be to submit multiple work orders and not see any follow-up. Your comfort and peace of mind are important to us, and we’d really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you directly to review your requests and ensure they are properly addressed. Please contact our office so we can follow up and assist right away.
I’ve only been here a little over 3 weeks and I’ll say the complex itself seems to be nicely kept. The second playground could use some TLC however kids will be kids. The trash isn’t terrible but again KIDS WILL BE KIDS😂 at least teach them to not just throw the trash on the ground in front the dumpster but actually throw it in the trash. It’s pretty quiet and peaceful. My apartment is very nice with a few blemishes like my locks need some replacements, the ac sounds like transformers lmao and maintenance seem to be short handed so I’ll be doing the minor things on my own. I am going to ask them to do something about the sound of the ac cause no. In conclusion I’d say this, I am ever so grateful for the $1200 I am paying for my 3 bdrm. I’ll give the property a 7.5/10.
Maintenance has been really fast on handling my hot water going out.
Owner response · Dec 2025
We're overjoyed to know that our maintenance team's quick response left a great impression on you. We are committed to providing efficient and immediate service, particularly for urgent matters like your hot water issue. Thank you for your 5-star review, it motivates us to continue improving our services.
Owner response · Dec 2025
Sherronda, We are happy to have made a good impression. Thank you for the review! Providence on the Park, Community Director
No notes yet
No notes yet