CARRIAGE HOMES ON THE LAKE

3232 N GARLAND AVE, GARLAND (DALLAS CO), TX, 750403402

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Garden 147 units Built 2012 3 stories ★ 3.8 (266 reviews) 🚶 54 Somewhat Walkable 🚌 30 Some Transit 🚲 54 Bikeable

$29,200,000

2025 Appraised Value

↓ 1.2% from prior year

📍 This parcel is part of the CARRIAGE HOMES ON THE LAKE - PHASE 2 - community — scraped data shown is for the full community.

CARRIAGE HOMES ON THE LAKE – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The property presents a structurally unsound acquisition: negative appraisal momentum, inverted leverage ($88.0M debt against $29.2M appraised value), and operational deterioration (Google rating down 16.7% in six months) are compounding a rent-to-walkability disconnect that cannot support the $243K/unit premium pricing without material operator intervention. While zero pipeline supply and a 2.96x DSCR provide near-term cushion, the affordability squeeze in the 1-mile submarket (29.3% rent-to-income ratio) combined with bimodal service delivery (staff-dependent satisfaction) signals elevated collection and turnover risk. The $6.5M valuation gap between appraised and estimated sale price and sparse debt maturity disclosures across nine facilities obscure true debt service capacity, and the mixed-income tenant demographic (31.1% under $50K income) amplifies downside exposure if occupancy softens. Pass—unless the acquisition thesis explicitly bundles operator replacement with a 12–18 month repositioning plan; as-is, the property is trading at a momentum premium the submarket and management execution cannot justify.

AI overview · Updated 1 day ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

Class B asset with selective value-add potential. The 2012 build shows consistent mid-range finishes across 147 units—quartz countertops (9 instances), white/light gray cabinetry, and mid-tier stainless appliances dominate the sample. Renovation clustering around 2018–2020 (10 units) suggests phased updates rather than building-wide capital, creating mixed unit conditions: 20 rated excellent versus 2 poor and 1 fair. Amenities punch above class—resort-style saltwater pool with cabana and modern clubhouse—indicating solid operational execution, though the townhome/garden-mix layout limits density upside and restricts capital redeployment flexibility typical of Class B plays.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago

/

AI Analysis

Location Profile Misaligned with Rent Positioning

Walk Score of 54 and Transit Score of 30 position Carriage Homes as car-dependent, limiting appeal to transit-reliant renters and constraining pricing power relative to urban-core Garland properties. The Bike Score of 54 provides marginal differentiation but cannot offset weak transit access or proximity gaps to major employment centers. At $2.0K/month, the property commands mid-market rents despite below-average walkability metrics—suggesting the value proposition relies heavily on unit quality, amenities, or lakeside positioning rather than location fundamentals. This rent-to-walkability disconnect warrants validation that in-place occupancy reflects unit features or a supply-constrained submarket rather than sustainable location-driven demand.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago
Distance Name Category
📍 14.5 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Pipeline Analysis: Carriage Homes on the Lake

Zero pipeline supply (0.0% of existing 147-unit base) eliminates near-term competitive pressure from new deliveries, a material advantage given the submarket's deteriorating vacancy trend. The absence of active permits within the competitive radius suggests limited near-term supply relief, which could support rent growth if the property can stabilize occupancy ahead of potential future deliveries. Timing is favorable—the property faces a softening market without new competition to capture demand during recovery.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago
🏗️ 0 permits within 3 mi
0% pipeline

No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles

Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt & Transaction History

Debt Structure & Refinancing Risk

The property carries $88.0M in aggregate debt across nine loans against a $29.2M appraised value and $35.7M estimated sale price—a leverage posture that appears inverted and warrants verification of valuation assumptions. The FHA loan originated in 2012 (matured 2054) and the primary Greystone refinance (2.68%, $22.9M, maturing June 2059) provide long-duration, low-rate funding, but the fragmented loan structure includes multiple small facilities ($3.2M, $3.5M, $8.2M) with sparse maturity disclosures, creating opacity around near-term refinancing pressure. At $598K per unit of disclosed debt, the loan-to-unit ratio is elevated relative to typical market dynamics.

Ownership & Motivation Signals

Ownership by BV Capital entities since February 2021 (3-year hold post-acquisition at $31.3M) coupled with nine transactions across 2012–2021 suggests a fund-managed hold rather than distressed motivation. The absentee, company-owned structure and contemporaneous deed of trust filings in 2021 reflect standard institutional financing; no foreclosure deeds, quit claims, or deed-in-lieu events appear in the chain. The 2.96 DSCR is healthy and not a distress indicator, though absent operating expense and NOI detail, debt service coverage cannot be independently validated.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago
Ownership Duration
5.1 years
Since Feb 2021
Transactions
9 recorded
Owner Type
Company
Absentee owner
Owner Mailing Address
8390 LYNDON B JOHNSON FWY STE 565, DALLAS, TX 75243-1666

🏛️ TX Comptroller Entity Data

Beneficial Owner
Steve May high
via officer match
Registered Agent
Vandelay Consolidated Llc
4925 GREENVILLE AVENUE STE 200, DALLAS, TX, 75206
Officers / Directors
Steve May — MANAGER
Entity Mailing Address
8390 LYNDON B JOHNSON FWY STE 565, DALLAS, TX, 75243
State of Formation
TX
SOS Status
ACTIVE
Current Lender
Graystone Fndg Co Llc
Loan Amount
$25,008,000 ($170,122/unit)
Maturity Date
Not recorded
Loan Type
Unknown
February 24, 2021 Resale Grant Deed
Buyer: Bvmf1 Chl2 Llc, from Bv Cap Multifamily Fund I Llc via Attorney Only
Sale price: $31,260,000
Graystone Fndg Co Llc $25,008,000 Senior Term: 42yr
February 24, 2021 Stand Alone Finance Deed of Trust
Buyer: Bvmf1 Chl2 Llc, via Attorney Only
November 24, 2020 Stand Alone Finance Deed of Trust
Buyer: Bvmfi Carriage Homes Llc,
Greystone Funding Corporation $22,916,500 Commercial Senior
September 25, 2019 Stand Alone Finance MO
Buyer: Bv Cap Multifamily Fund I Llc,
Plainscapital Bk $3,200,000 Senior Term: 1yr
July 23, 2019 Stand Alone Finance MO
Buyer: Bv Cap Multifamily Fund I Llc,
Plainscapital Bk $3,200,000 Senior
December 26, 2018 Stand Alone Finance Deed of Trust
Buyer: Bv Cap Multifamily Fund I Llc, via Attorney Only
Roeder $3,500,000 Senior
September 29, 2017 Construction Loan/Financing Special Warranty Deed
Buyer: Bvmfi Carriage Homes Llc, from Garland Carriage Homes Lp via Chicago Title
February 10, 2016 Stand Alone Finance MO
Buyer: Garland Carriage Homes Lp, via Attorney Only
Berkadia Com'l Mtg $8,219,200 Senior Rate: 3.8%
Berkadia Com'l Mtg $8,219,200 Senior Term: 38yr
February 10, 2016 Stand Alone Finance MO
Buyer: Garland Carriage Homes Lp, via Attorney Only
Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

Carriage Homes on the Lake trades at a significant valuation premium relative to comparable Class A multifamily in Dallas. The $243K/unit sale price is 2.1x the submarket average of $116.5K/unit, yet the 5.09% cap rate sits 67 basis points below the 5.76% submarket average—pricing the asset as stabilized rather than value-add despite an 8.2% vacancy rate. The 45.0% opex ratio and $12.4K NOI per unit are healthy, but the $6.5M gap between appraised value ($29.2M) and estimated sale price ($35.7M) suggests either significant income growth priced in or valuation disconnect. Strong 2.96x DSCR and tight tax burden ($4.97K/unit) support the premium, though upside is limited without material operational improvement or market cap rate compression.

AI analysis · Updated 8 days ago

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
$35,725,714
Sale $/Unit
$243,032
Value YoY
-1.2%
Implied Cap Rate
6.23%
Est. Cap Rate
5.09%

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
$3,603,705/yr
Est. Vacancy
8.2%
Submarket Vac.
3.6%
Eff. Gross Income
$3,308,201/yr
OpEx Ratio
45%
Est. NOI
$1,819,511/yr
NOI/Unit
$12,378/yr

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
$4,966/yr
Est. DSCR
2.96

Based on most recent loan: $25,008,000 (Feb 2021, attom)

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
5.76%
Property: 5.09% (-0.67pp)
Price/Unit Benchmark
$116,522
Property: $243,032 (↑109%)
Rent/SF
$1.74/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

CARRIAGE HOMES ON THE LAKE is a 147-unit garden-style apartment complex built in 2012 with brick exterior and wood-frame construction, spanning 163.96K SF across three stories in Garland. The property carries excellent quality and condition ratings with a 153.6K SF net leasable area, yielding a 93.7% efficiency ratio. Located in a car-dependent submarket (Walk Score 54), the asset maintains a 3.8 Google rating but lacks disclosed parking specifications and amenity details that would inform competitive positioning within the Dallas-Fort Worth multifamily landscape.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago

Property Details

Account #
26080900010010000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Garden
Construction
D-WOOD FRAME
Quality
EXCELLENT
Condition
EXCELLENT
Stories
3
Gross Building Area
163,965 SF
Net Leasable Area
153,598 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
September 29, 2017
Place ID
ChIJ_YPdSDMcTIYRpP5wwuTASA8
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
about 2 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
BVMF1 CARRIAGE HOMES LLC
Mailing Address
DALLAS, TEXAS 752431188
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Performance

Elevated vacancy and wide rent dispersion signal aggressive leasing push. With 12 active listings (8.2% of 147 units) and 2BR asking rents spanning $1,825–$2,275 across recent leases, the property is deploying variable pricing rather than concessions—likely to absorb turnover. The 2BR average of $2.1M sits $5 below market benchmark ($1,995), while 1BR at $1.1M trails benchmark ($1,320) by 17.9%, suggesting weaker demand in smaller units. No concession data and rapid daily lease activity (20 leases in 6 days through early April) indicate active turnover management, but the spread in 2BR rents hints at selective rate-cutting rather than market-rate recovery.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago
Submarket Rent Growth
📊 Nearby properties
Vacancy Trend
Deteriorating
📊 RentCast zip-level data
Submarket Rent/SF
$1.74/sf
📊 Nearby properties

Rent Trends

Estimated Occupancy

Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units

🏠 12 active listings | 1BR avg $1,120 (mkt $1,320 ↓15% ) | 2BR avg $2,127 (mkt $1,995 ↑7% ) | Trend: ↑ 14.0%
Unit Beds Baths Sqft Rent Status Listed Days
2BR 2 1,297 $2,275 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $2,275 Jan $2,275 Feb $2,275 Feb $2,275 Feb $2,275 Feb $2,275 Mar $2,275 Mar $2,275 Mar $2,275 Mar $2,275 Mar $2,275 Apr $2,275 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,297 $2,275 Active Apr 4 1
Jan $2,275 Jan $2,275 Feb $2,275 Feb $2,275 Feb $2,275 Mar $2,275 Mar $2,275 Mar $2,275 Apr $2,275 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,254 $2,225 Active Apr 4 1
Jan $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Apr $2,225 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,254 $2,225 Active Apr 4 1
Jan $2,225 Jan $2,225 Jan $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Apr $2,225 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,254 $2,225 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $2,225 Jan $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Apr $2,225 Apr $2,225 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $2,195 Active Apr 5 1
Jan $2,195 Jan $2,195 Feb $2,195 Mar $2,195 Mar $2,195 Mar $2,195 Apr $2,195 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Active Apr 6 1
Dec $1,995 Dec $1,995 Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Apr $1,995 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Active Apr 4 1
Dec $1,995 Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Apr $1,995 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Active Apr 5 1
Feb $1,995 Mar $1,995 Apr $1,995 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Apr $1,995 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Apr $1,995 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 661 $1,120 Active Oct 1 188
Oct $1,120
2BR 2 1,254 $2,325 Inactive May 18 1
May $2,325 May $2,325 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,254 $2,225 Inactive Apr 2 1
May $2,325 Jan $2,225 Jan $2,225 Jan $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 Apr $2,225 (↓4.3%)
2BR 2 1,254 $2,225 Inactive Mar 8 1
Jan $2,225 Jan $2,225 Feb $2,225 Feb $2,225 Mar $2,225 Mar $2,225 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $2,195 Inactive Apr 3 1
Jan $2,195 Feb $2,195 Feb $2,195 Mar $2,195 Mar $2,195 Mar $2,195 Mar $2,195 Apr $2,195 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $2,195 Inactive Apr 3 1
Jan $2,195 Feb $2,195 Feb $2,195 Feb $2,195 Mar $2,195 Mar $2,195 Apr $2,195 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $2,195 Inactive Jan 31 1
Jan $2,195 Jan $2,195 Jan $2,195 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,254 $2,075 Inactive Mar 11 1
Jan $2,075 Feb $2,075 Feb $2,075 Mar $2,075 Mar $2,075 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Inactive Apr 3 1
Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Apr $1,995 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Inactive Mar 30 1
Dec $1,995 Feb $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 Mar $1,995 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,189 $1,995 Inactive Feb 11 1
Jan $1,995 Jan $1,995 Feb $1,995 Feb $1,995 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,176 $1,950 Inactive Mar 26 1
Dec $1,950 Dec $1,950 Jan $1,950 Jan $1,950 Feb $1,950 Feb $1,950 Feb $1,950 Feb $1,950 Mar $1,950 Mar $1,950 Mar $1,950 Mar $1,950 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,176 $1,950 Inactive Apr 1 1
Apr $1,950
2BR 2 1,178 $1,925 Inactive Mar 26 1
Jan $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Mar $1,925 Mar $1,925 Mar $1,925 Mar $1,925 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,178 $1,925 Inactive Mar 24 1
Jan $1,925 Jan $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Mar $1,925 Mar $1,925 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,178 $1,925 Inactive Mar 11 1
Jan $1,925 Jan $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Feb $1,925 Mar $1,925 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,104 $1,870 Inactive Mar 11 1
Jan $1,870 Jan $1,870 Feb $1,870 Feb $1,870 Feb $1,870 Feb $1,870 Mar $1,870 Mar $1,870 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,104 $1,870 Inactive Feb 19 1
Jan $1,870 Jan $1,870 Feb $1,870 Feb $1,870 Feb $1,870 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,176 $1,835 Inactive Mar 6 1
Jan $1,835 Jan $1,835 Feb $1,835 Feb $1,835 Feb $1,835 Feb $1,835 Feb $1,835 Mar $1,835 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,178 $1,825 Inactive Apr 3 1
Jan $1,825 Jan $1,825 Feb $1,825 Mar $1,825 Mar $1,825 Mar $1,825 Mar $1,825 Mar $1,825 Apr $1,825 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,799 Inactive Feb 16 1
Feb $1,799 Feb $1,799 Feb $1,799 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,799 Inactive Jan 31 1
Jan $1,799
2BR 2 1,146 $1,794 Inactive Feb 18 1
Jan $1,794 Jan $1,794 Feb $1,794 Feb $1,794 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,789 Inactive Feb 19 1
Jan $1,789 Jan $1,789 Feb $1,789 Feb $1,789 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,774 Inactive Jun 15 1
Jun $1,774
2BR 2 1,146 $1,769 Inactive Feb 19 1
Jan $1,769 Feb $1,769 Feb $1,769 Feb $1,769 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,769 Inactive Feb 19 1
Feb $1,769 Feb $1,769 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,769 Inactive Feb 19 1
Dec $1,769 Jan $1,769 Feb $1,769 Feb $1,769 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,769 Inactive Jan 29 1
Jan $1,769 Jan $1,769 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,146 $1,769 Inactive Dec 26 1
Dec $1,769
1BR 1 869 $1,650 Inactive Feb 18 1
Feb $1,650 Feb $1,650 Feb $1,650 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 869 $1,650 Inactive May 31 1
May $1,650 May $1,650 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 869 $1,650 Inactive May 26 1
May $1,650
1BR 1 850 $1,600 Inactive May 17 1
May $1,600
1BR 1 751 $1,475 Inactive May 14 1
May $1,475
1BR 1 751 $1,450 Inactive May 31 1
May $1,450
1BR 1 721 $1,445 Inactive May 14 1
May $1,445
1BR 1 661 $1,430 Inactive May 17 1
May $1,430 May $1,430 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 661 $1,430 Inactive May 12 1
May $1,430
1BR 1 758 $1,419 Inactive Apr 2 1
Jan $1,419 Feb $1,419 Feb $1,419 Feb $1,419 Mar $1,419 Mar $1,419 Apr $1,419 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 758 $1,419 Inactive Apr 3 1
Feb $1,419 Feb $1,419 Mar $1,419 Mar $1,419 Mar $1,419 Apr $1,419 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 758 $1,419 Inactive Mar 9 1
Feb $1,419 Feb $1,419 Mar $1,419 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 751 $1,365 Inactive Jan 9 1
Jan $1,365
1BR 1 751 $1,325 Inactive Feb 18 1
Dec $1,325 Dec $1,325 Jan $1,325 Jan $1,325 Feb $1,325 Feb $1,325 Feb $1,325 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 751 $1,300 Inactive Feb 19 1
Dec $1,300 Jan $1,300 Jan $1,300 Jan $1,300 Feb $1,300 Feb $1,300 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 751 $1,280 Inactive Jan 30 1
Jan $1,280 Jan $1,280 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 751 $1,280 Inactive Jan 30 1
Jan $1,280 Jan $1,280 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 661 $1,205 Inactive Feb 18 1
Feb $1,205 Feb $1,205 Feb $1,205 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 661 $1,185 Inactive Jun 15 1
Jun $1,185
1BR 1 661 $1,165 Inactive Jan 30 1
Jan $1,165 Jan $1,165 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 661 $1,145 Inactive Dec 26 1
Dec $1,145 Dec $1,145 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 661 $1,120 Inactive Dec 26 1
Dec $1,120 Dec $1,120 Dec $1,120 (↑0.0%)
Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

Affordability gap signals tenant vulnerability in the 1-mile submarket. The property's $2.0M annual rent ($2,043/month) consumes 29.3% of median household income within 1 mile—above the 28% threshold—yet renter concentration of 46.6% suggests sufficient demand density to fill units. The 3-mile radius presents a stronger credit profile: median income jumps to $86.5K with an affordability ratio of 22.7%, indicating the property draws from a wider, more affluent tenant base than its immediate neighborhood.

Income distribution skews toward higher brackets in the 3- and 5-mile rings (40% earn $100K+), but the 1-mile core is bifurcated—31.1% under $50K paired with 32% earning $100K+—indicating mixed-income density that supports occupancy but raises collection risk on lower-income cohorts. Population stability across all three radii (no growth data provided) and flat renter percentages (37.5–46.6%) suggest steady-state demand rather than expansion tailwinds; asset performance will depend on execution and unit-level pricing discipline against the localized affordability squeeze.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago

1-Mile Radius

Population
16,907
Households
6,102
Avg Household Size
2.8
Median HH Income
$66,334
Median Home Value
$263,283
Median Rent
$1,620
% Renter Occupied
46.6%
Affordability
29.3% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

3-Mile Radius

Population
122,259
Households
42,476
Avg Household Size
2.91
Median HH Income
$86,505
Median Home Value
$277,650
Median Rent
$1,638
% Renter Occupied
37.5%
Affordability
22.7% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
293,511
Households
102,049
Avg Household Size
2.97
Median HH Income
$85,989
Median Home Value
$278,674
Median Rent
$1,653
% Renter Occupied
42.1%
Affordability
23.1% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 3 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix

Unit Mix Analysis: Carriage Homes on the Lake

The property exhibits severe data incompleteness—only 12 of 147 units appear in active listings, masking the true composition and rent performance across the portfolio. The stated mix (23 one-bedroom, 39 two-bedroom, 85 unaccounted units) suggests a two-bedroom-heavy skew (26.5% of disclosed units), but this conflicts with the listings sample showing only 8.4% one-bedroom penetration and 91.7% two-bedroom. The disclosed one-bedroom ($1.12K) underperforms the two-bedroom ($2.13K) by 47.0%, a rent delta consistent with market norms, yet the unit count discrepancy prevents assessment of whether current occupancy, lease-up dynamics, or data quality issues drive the misalignment. Without occupancy rates or a complete unit ledger, assessing alignment with tenant demographics or market positioning is not feasible.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago

Estimated from 62 listed units (42.2% of 147 total)

1BR 23 units
2BR 39 units
Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Appraisal & Value Interpretation

The property is declining in value, down 1.2% YoY to $29.2M ($198.6K per unit), suggesting headwinds in the current market or asset-specific performance issues. The improvement-to-land ratio (94.6% vs 5.4%) is heavily weighted toward structures with minimal land optionality—redevelopment is not viable here absent a significant market recovery to justify demolition. With only a single appraisal data point, trend momentum is unclear, but negative YoY movement in a 2012-vintage asset warrants investigation into rent trajectory, occupancy, and capital expenditure needs relative to comps.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $29,200,000 -1.2%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Deteriorating operational control masks structural property appeal. The 3.8 overall rating obscures a sharp 2.0 avg in the last 6 months vs. 2.4 prior—a 16.7% decline driven by recurring maintenance failures, unresponsive management, and staff inconsistency. The bimodal distribution (68 one-stars, 158 five-stars) signals service delivery is personality-dependent: Rosa and Lexus generate praise; named staff (Ciara, Mattie Le Blanc) trigger complaints about responsiveness, AC emergencies ignored during 90°F+ weather, and seven-day maintenance backlogs. Negative reviews cite uninvoked emergency protocols, vendor theft, and noise enforcement lapses—red flags for capital expenditure exposure and lease turnover risk. The property's inherent desirability (lakeside, Garland location, unit aesthetics) is being destroyed by management inconsistency, undercutting valuation unless operator turnover is bundled into the acquisition thesis.

AI analysis · Updated 1 day ago

Rating Distribution

5★
158 (66%)
4★
7 (3%)
3★
4 (2%)
2★
4 (2%)
1★
68 (28%)

241 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

Chris Brito ★★★★★ Feb 2026

When my spouse stumbled upon Carriage Homes on the Lake. I was surprised that such place existed in Garland. It feels like you’re stepping into a portal of peace and tranquility with the amazing pond that is a center piece when you drive through and enter the property. The animal life that exists at the pond is a warming detail and I very much appreciate, when going on those sun set walks with my spouse and our pup. I have been pleasantly pleased with my stay so far. The staff is amazing and super friendly, and most importantly attentive. You can see their efforts in ensuring the community is nicely kept for their residents to enjoy.

Owner response · Feb 2026

Thank you, Chris! We're delighted to hear that Carriage Homes on the Lake has brought peace and tranquility to your life and that you enjoy the beautiful surroundings and friendly staff. Welcome Home!

Morgan Carrell ★☆☆☆☆ Jan 2026

Don’t move here unless you want to be sick constantly from something going on in the apartments. I’ve lived here maybe 7 months now and have had almost 10 or more maintenance request for living conditions in the apartment. Yellowjackets have litterally infested inside my home, there is mold everywhere,, my water heater has been leaking where people cannot stay inside my home without getting headaches, and the list goes on and on. Maintenance comes and says they will be back but will never return just to remove your work order.

Owner response · Nov 2025

Thank you, Morgan! We're happy to hear about the improvements in maintenance and communication. We're glad you're enjoying the neighborhood!

Lenn Johnson ★☆☆☆☆ Dec 2025

Words can’t describe how disappointed I am with the service of this complex. I’ve been living here for three years and never had to deal with inconvenience until now. I’m pretty sure it’s new management and office staff. As you can see in the photo I put in a maintenance request to get my bath tub fixed back in October. Today is Dec 4 and I’m still getting the run around on when my tub is supposed to be fixed. I’ve messaged the office several times even had an extra key made for maintenance to get in my place still no progress and it’s beyond frustrating. Never had this problem with maintenance years prior.

Owner response · Dec 2025

We apologize for the inconvenience you've experienced, Lenn. We work very hard to maintain high resident satisfaction. We are concerned so please contact us directly at info@wh-management.com so we can address your concerns and work towards a quick resolution.

Alemeshet Woldesemaiat ★☆☆☆☆ Nov 2025

I am extremely disappointed with the level of disrespect and unprofessional behavior I have experienced at this apartment complex, especially from a leasing office staff member named Ciara. Her behavior has been consistently rude, dismissive, and completely unacceptable. Every time I’ve interacted with her, she has spoken to me with an attitude and treated me as if I’m a burden instead of a resident. I even overheard her talking negatively about other residents immediately after helping them. No professional should ever behave like that. Move-in day was another major issue. She told us to be there at 9 AM for the keys but kept us waiting until almost 1 PM. We stood outside with all of our belongings for nearly four hours because she would not give us the keys on time. That alone shows a complete lack of care or responsibility.After everything I’ve experienced, I strongly recommend that people DO NOT RENT THERE. The customer service is terrible, the staff is unprofessional, and residents are not treated with basic respect.

Owner response · Nov 2025

We apologize for the negative experience you've had, Alemeshet. Please contact us directly at info@wh-management.com so we can address your concerns and work towards improving our service.

Maria ★★★★★ Oct 2025

Owner response · Oct 2025

Thank you, Maria, for the 5-star rating! We truly appreciate your support!

Showing 5 of 241 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet