1204 E BELT LINE RD, CEDAR HILL, TX, 751042361
$11,650,000
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 17.7% from prior year
PASS. This is a mature LIHTC senior housing asset with refinancing distress signaling, poor market positioning, and limited value-add runway that does not merit acquisition at current debt levels.
The property's 17.7% YoY appreciation to $11.65M masks operational fragility: a $6.143M HUD/FHA loan matured in January 2022 with terminated status, and the remaining $9.265M in active debt lacks rate/maturity transparency, suggesting either workout terms or incomplete underwriting data that creates unquantifiable refinancing risk on a 22-year-old tax credit property in a tightening HUD environment. At $70.2K debt per unit, leverage is moderate in isolation, but absent DSCR documentation and with a matured affordable housing product, the path to conventional refinancing is opaque. Demographically, the 1-mile submarket is affluent ($114.1K median HHI, 55.3% earning $100K+) yet only 36.6% renter-occupied—a structural mismatch that pushes demand to a 5-mile radius where affordability widens but density weakens; this concentration risk on tax credit tenants in a car-dependent location (Walk Score 31) limits rent upside and refinancing flexibility. Recent Google review clustering (4.5 average, 13 of 16 five-star reviews) reflects a management change (April 2025) rather than capital improvement, while 2002 unit interiors (honey oak cabinetry, original appliances) signal deferred renovation needs that, combined with submarket vacancy softening and zero near-term supply relief, position this as a value-add candidate—exactly the profile lenders avoid on seasoned LIHTC stock. Watch-list only if seller acknowledges matured debt status and demonstrates feasible refi path; otherwise, acquisition thesis requires accepting legacy financing risk without operational upside sufficient to offset it.
No notes yet
Apartment Living in Cedar Hill, TX
The Rose at Cedar Hill is for those who are 55 years old or older. Two bedroom apartments available! We now accept Flex rent payments.
Class B asset with selective amenity upgrades masking dated unit interiors. The kitchen evidence—honey oak raised-panel cabinets, white laminate counters, and builder-grade white coil-top appliances—indicates original 2002 construction with no unit-level renovation. Conversely, the clubhouse and fitness center reflect 2018–2022 refreshes with contemporary furnishings and finishes, creating a disconnect between common areas and residential product. Significant value-add opportunity exists in kitchen/bath modernization across the 132-unit portfolio, though the piecemeal renovation timeline suggests capital constraints or previous ownership's selective spend.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Poor walkability fundamentals undermine density economics. With a Walk Score of 31 and Bike Score of 36, this Cedar Hill property is deeply car-dependent, limiting appeal to transit-conscious renters and constraining operational upside from reduced parking requirements. The absence of transit data and missing rent comps prevent full assessment, but a 132-unit complex in a suburban location lacking pedestrian infrastructure typically supports workforce/C-class positioning rather than amenity-driven rents. Without proximity metrics to Dallas employment centers or documented nearby retail/dining density, this location likely depends on affordability pricing and stable employer anchors rather than walkability arbitrage.
No notes yet
No near-term supply pressure, but submarket headwinds demand attention. Pipeline units represent 0.0% of the 132-unit inventory with zero active construction projects nearby, eliminating competitive lease-up risk over the next 2–3 years. However, the deteriorating vacancy trend in the submarket suggests demand softness that cannot be offset by supply scarcity alone—rental growth will depend on broader Cedar Hill market stabilization rather than supply constraints. Recommend stress-testing underwriting assumptions for occupancy hold rather than growth.
No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles
No notes yet
Debt & Ownership Interpretation:
This property exhibits acute refinancing risk: a $6.143M HUD/FHA loan (52.7% of appraised value) matured in January 2022 and shows terminated status, while the remaining $9.265M in active debt across two loans lacks visible maturity dates or rate information—a data gap that suggests either incomplete loan records or intentional opacity around rate lock exposure. The ownership structure (absentee LLCA entity) has made only two transactions in 4.3 years, with a 2017 quit claim deed from a senior housing LP followed by 2021 refinancing, indicating neither distress signals nor active value-add repositioning. At $70.2K debt per unit on $88.3K appraised value per unit, leverage is moderate, but the terminated HUD loan absent from current active debt—combined with no DSCR data—suggests the property may be operating without conventional financing or under workout terms; this matured affordable housing product (60% Tax Credit TDHCA) likely faces refinancing challenges given HUD's tightening posture on aging stock. Seller motivation is plausible but not yet evident without current operating metrics.
No notes yet
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $1,550,000 (Dec 2021, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Primrose Cedar Hill is a 132-unit, garden-style senior housing community (55+) built in 2002 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior in a car-dependent Cedar Hill submarket (Walk Score 31). The property comprises 139.3K gross sq ft across one story with good quality but average condition, offering covered parking and in-unit washer/dryer connections alongside typical senior amenities (fitness center, pool, community programming, transportation). Utility split between landlord and resident is unspecified in the data, and pet policy requires direct inquiry; the 60% tax credit designation indicates workforce affordability positioning rather than market-rate operations.
No notes yet
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
Min/avg/max asking rents from property website
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BR | 2 | 950 | $1,531 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,531
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 1 | 950 | $1,260 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,260
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 800 | $1,051 | Inactive | Mar 25 | — | |
|
Mar $1,051
|
|||||||
No notes yet
Affordability mismatch signals tenant quality risk in an affluent 1-mile core. The immediate submarket (1-mile) skews sharply upmarket—median HHI of $114.1K with 55.3% of households earning $100K+—yet renter concentration is just 36.6%, suggesting limited natural demand density for multifamily. The 20.1% affordability ratio at 1-mile is tight; unless this property is positioned as workforce/TDHCA-subsidized (the "60% TC" designation implies it is), rent absorption may compete against owner-occupied alternatives in a high-equity neighborhood. By 5-mile radius, the market normalizes: HHI drops to $86.4K, renter concentration rises to 32.0%, and affordability widens to 26.3%—indicating the property draws from a broader, less affluent ring where multifamily is more defensible. The 3-mile zone bridges these, with lowest renter % (22.9%), suggesting Cedar Hill's immediate suburban character does not naturally anchor apartment demand.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 1 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
No notes yet
Please Call For Details.
No notes yet
The property posted 17.7% YoY appreciation to $11.65M, translating to $88.3K per unit—a strong run that likely reflects Dallas multifamily strength rather than unit-level operational gains given the 2002 vintage. Land represents just 11.9% of total value ($1.39M), limiting redevelopment optionality; the improvement-heavy structure ($10.26M) signals the value resides in stabilized operations, not dirt upside. Single-year snapshot without historical comparables obscures whether this reflects market recovery, cap rate compression, or property-specific improvement.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $11,650,000 | +17.7% |
No notes yet
Rating trajectory shows sharp recent improvement masking legacy maintenance issues. The property recovered from a 4.0 prior six-month baseline to 4.5 overall (13 of 16 reviews are 5-star), driven entirely by management change—residents explicitly credit new manager "Amy" (Apr-May 2025) for responsiveness and community engagement. However, the lone 1-star review (Oct 2021) flags unresolved deferred maintenance (kitchen flooring hazards), and the absence of recent negative reviews doesn't confirm remediation. For a 132-unit LIHTC property, the management pivot is operationally positive, but the review sample is too small (16 total) and skewed toward recent 5-star clustering to validate capital condition or rule out maintenance backlog.
16 reviews total
Love my Rose Community of Cedar Hill. The management group are striving to keep the grounds clean and most importantly the residents safe and happy.
New manager Ms. Amy is pleasant and listens to our concerns. I enjoy participating in activities.
Well we finally got a good one😀thank you Amy for all you have done for our community.
No notes yet
No notes yet