JEFFERSON LANDMARK APARTMENTS

14650 LANDMARK BLVD, FARMERS BRANCH, TX, 75254

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Mid-Rise 324 units Built 2017 5 stories ★ 4.0 (523 reviews) 🚶 73 Very Walkable 🚌 47 Some Transit 🚲 51 Bikeable

$69,453,300

2025 Appraised Value

↑ 0.7% from prior year

JEFFERSON LANDMARK APARTMENTS – INVESTMENT OVERVIEW

Watch-List / Pass – The property presents a classic operational distress signal masking what would otherwise be a stable, if unspectacular, income asset. Jefferson Landmark trades at a 5.23% cap rate ($214.4K/unit valuation) despite generating only $11.2K NOI/unit, a 75-basis-point discount to submarket comps ($16.5K/unit at 5.98% cap), suggesting either aggressive pricing or material operational underperformance. The sharp Google rating deterioration (4.2 to 3.5 in six months) driven by maintenance failures, management churn, and facility decline aligns with below-market earnings; without evidence of near-term operational restructuring by the six-year hold sponsor, this asset likely represents value-destruction in a hardening rate environment rather than a turnaround opportunity. The broader demand profile—affluent renters in the 3- to 5-mile rings offset by stretched 1-mile affordability (25.8% ratio)—is stable but offers no pricing cushion if occupancy continues downward. Recommendation: Pass unless sponsor commits to capital plan and operational reset; otherwise monitor for forced sale timing in 12–18 months.

AI overview · Updated 3 days ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

The Luster of Luxury

Experience resort-style living in an urban oasis of excitement. Located in the heart of Addison, Texas, our stunning apartment community is easily accessible to premium shopping, bustling entertainment, exquisite dining, and more! We offer an array of one and two-bedroom apartments and lofts for rent with unique floor plans designed to fit your lifestyle. Discover your new "home sweet home" in the heart of the city as our Addison apartment homes feature a modern kitchen with granite countertops, walk-in closets, pendant lighting, hardwood-style flooring and an in-unit washer and dryer and plenty of natural light. Select apartment homes feature 20-foot ceilings, walk-in showers and stainless-steel appliances. Our sought-after pet-friendly community also has a host of premium amenities to make your life convenient, including resort-style swimming pool, 24-hour state-of-the-art fitness center, and an expansive clubhouse with a pool table and movie room. Enjoy urban living with a modern Texas twist at Jewel on Landmark!

Jefferson Landmark Apartments exhibits strong Class B+ positioning with minimal value-add opportunity. The 2017-built, 324-unit property demonstrates consistent unit renovations across the 2018–2020 window: 85% of photo observations show upgraded or premium finishes, with quartz countertops (16 instances) and modern slab cabinetry (11 instances) standard. Stainless steel appliances appear in the majority of kitchen samples, though the appliance tier clusters toward builder-grade to mid-range brands (GE, Samsung, LG) rather than premium. The property exhibits excellent physical condition (45 of 79 observations) with fresh paint (43 instances) and no material deferred maintenance flagged, though two "poor" condition observations warrant investigation. Amenities—resort pool, contemporary fitness center with floor-to-ceiling windows, and modern clubhouse—punch at Class A standards, supporting the overall market positioning but leaving limited renovation upside for acquirers focused on value-add plays.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago

/

AI Analysis

Location Profile

Jefferson Landmark's Walk Score of 73 supports its $1.99K monthly rent, indicating sufficient pedestrian infrastructure to reduce car dependency for routine errands—a legitimate amenity for cost-conscious renters in suburban Dallas. However, the Transit Score of 47 and Bike Score of 51 reveal meaningful gaps: this property lacks the multimodal connectivity that would justify premium pricing or attract transit-dependent renters, limiting appeal to younger professionals without vehicles. The Farmers Branch location—a secondary suburban node—means tenants likely accept car reliance as a trade-off for affordability and space, which aligns with the mid-market rent positioning. A 324-unit stabilized asset here succeeds through operational efficiency and household formation demand rather than location prestige, making tenant retention dependent on amenity package quality rather than walkable neighborhood character.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago
Distance Name Category
📍 11.6 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Zero near-term supply pressure despite deteriorating vacancy. With 0.0% pipeline penetration and no active construction nearby, JEFFERSON LANDMARK faces no competitive supply headwinds—a rare advantage in a softening market. However, the deteriorating vacancy trend suggests demand weakness is the primary driver of any occupancy loss, not oversupply; this points to need for pricing strategy adjustment or property-level improvements rather than market-timing concerns. The absence of competing deliveries provides a window to stabilize before supply does materialize.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago
🏗️ 0 permits within 3 mi
0% pipeline

No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles

Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt & Transaction History

Key Takeaway: Absence of debt records presents acquisition risk and suggests either a cash purchase or incomplete data capture; the six-year hold by an absentee corporate entity with no transaction activity signals a potential value-realization window.

The property shows zero recorded debt against a $69.5M valuation ($214.5K/unit), which is atypical for institutional multifamily and either indicates an all-cash acquisition or missing lien records—both warrant due diligence before underwriting refinance capacity. The single 2020 acquisition by BW Landmark entities (LLC structure, absentee ownership) with no subsequent activity or debt layering suggests a buy-and-hold play rather than a flip strategy; combined with the post-pandemic entry timing, this positioning may now face pressure to monetize given six-year ownership duration and current rate environment. The absence of DSCR data and loan maturity timeline prevents assessment of debt service health or refinancing urgency, but the clean deed history and stable ownership entity profile rule out distress signals.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago
Ownership Duration
6.2 years
Since Jan 2020
Transactions
1 recorded
Owner Type
Company
Absentee owner
Owner Mailing Address
257 PARK AVE S FL 13, NEW YORK, NY 10010-7358

🏛️ TX Comptroller Entity Data

Beneficial Owner
Gideon Z Friedman high
via officer match
Registered Agent
Ct Corporation System
1999 BRYAN ST, SUITE 900, DALLAS, TX, 75201
Officers / Directors
Gideon Z Friedman — GOVERNING
Entity Mailing Address
1999 BRYAN ST STE 900, DALLAS, TX, 75201
State of Formation
DE
SOS Status
ACTIVE
January 14, 2020 Resale Grant Deed
Buyer: Bw Landmark Investors Llc,Bw Landmark Wydward Llc from Jefferson Landmark Lp
Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

NOI Per Unit & Valuation Disconnect

Jefferson Landmark's $11.2K NOI/unit sits materially below the submarket median of $16.5K (implied by $166.3K/unit price and 5.98% cap rate), signaling either below-market operations or aggressive pricing at $214.4K/unit. The 5.23% implied cap rate undercuts the submarket 5.98% by 75 basis points despite a 50% opex ratio that appears reasonable for a 2017 asset, suggesting the market is not pricing in current earnings power. The 6.2% vacancy assumption is conservative relative to stabilized Dallas Class B/C benchmarks, implying material upside if occupancy tightens or rents push higher.

AI analysis · Updated 8 days ago

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
Sale $/Unit
Value YoY
+0.7%
Implied Cap Rate
5.23%
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
$7,740,230/yr
Est. Vacancy
6.2%
Submarket Vac.
5.3%
Eff. Gross Income
$7,260,336/yr
OpEx Ratio
50%
Est. NOI
$3,630,168/yr
NOI/Unit
$11,204/yr

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
$5,359/yr
Est. DSCR

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
5.98%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$166,343
Rent/SF
$2.05/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

Jefferson Landmark Apartments is a 324-unit, mid-rise (5-story) Class D wood-frame property in Farmers Branch completed in 2017 with 379.9K SF gross area and good physical condition. Unit finishes include stainless steel appliances, wood-style flooring, walk-in showers, and in-unit features; common amenities span resort-style pool, rooftop lounge, coworking, and fitness. The property carries no specified parking data and neither includes nor charges utilities separately. Located in Addison with a 73 walk score and 4.0 Google rating, the community is pet-friendly with third-party screening.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago

Property Details

Account #
240961000A0010000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Mid-Rise
Construction
D-WOOD FRAME
Quality
GOOD
Condition
GOOD
Stories
5
Gross Building Area
379,948 SF
Net Leasable Area
294,743 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
January 14, 2020
Place ID
ChIJga1m7FohTIYRjVdYjIEu32k
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
about 2 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
BW LANDMARK INVESTORS LLC &
Mailing Address
BW LANDMARK WYNDWARD LLC
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 100107358
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Performance

Jefferson Landmark is pricing above submarket benchmarks, with 2BR units at $2.3M averaging 13.2% above the $2.033M comparable while 1BR trails at $1.785M (15.5% below $1.546M benchmark)—a portfolio-wide premium driven by stronger 2BR demand that creates unit-type arbitrage. Positive 17.2% submarket growth and zero active concessions suggest tight market conditions, though 6.2% availability (20 of 324 units) indicates the property is leasing normally rather than capturing outsized momentum. Recent lease activity shows wide 1BR scatter ($1.62M–$2.04M range) versus tighter 2BR clustering ($2.06M–$2.51M), implying better pricing power and lower lease-to-lease volatility in the larger unit type.

AI analysis · Updated 8 days ago
Submarket Rent Growth
+17.2% trailing 12mo
📊 Nearby properties
Vacancy Trend
Deteriorating
📊 RentCast zip-level data
Submarket Rent/SF
$2.05/sf
📊 Nearby properties

Rent Trends

Estimated Occupancy

Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units

Available Units Over Time

Latest Scrape (Mar 24, 2026)

Available
8 units

Fees

Application: Admin: Pet Deposit: Pet Rent Monthly:
🏠 20 active listings | 1BR avg $1,785 (mkt $1,546 ↑15% ) | 2BR avg $2,300 (mkt $2,033 ↑13% ) | Trend: ↑ 2.4%
Unit Beds Baths Sqft Rent Status Listed Days
2BR 2 1,249 $2,512 Active Apr 5 1
Apr $2,512
2BR 2 1,182 $2,383 Active Apr 5 1
Jan $2,209 Jan $2,209 Feb $2,512 Feb $2,512 Mar $2,570 Mar $2,570 Mar $2,106 Mar $2,106 Apr $2,383 (↑7.9%)
2BR 2 1,121 $2,373 Active Apr 4 1
Jan $2,199 Jan $2,199 Jan $2,104 Feb $2,104 Feb $2,500 Feb $2,500 Mar $2,096 Apr $2,373 (↑7.9%)
2BR 2 1,124 $2,329 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $2,124 Feb $2,028 Feb $2,028 Feb $2,413 Mar $2,471 Mar $2,471 Mar $2,021 Apr $2,329 Apr $2,329 (↑9.7%)
2BR 2 1,182 $2,309 Active Apr 5 1
Apr $2,309
2BR 2 1,182 $2,308 Active Apr 6 1
Feb $2,024 Feb $2,024 Feb $2,024 Feb $2,133 Mar $2,133 Apr $2,308 Apr $2,308 (↑14.0%)
2BR 2 984 $2,123 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $1,949 Jan $1,949 Feb $2,208 Feb $2,283 Mar $2,283 Mar $2,283 Mar $1,948 Apr $2,123 (↑8.9%)
2BR 2 984 $2,064 Active Apr 5 1
Feb $2,140 Mar $2,213 Mar $1,889 Mar $1,889 Apr $2,064 (↓3.6%)
1BR 1 885 $2,056 Active Apr 4 1
Apr $2,056
1BR 1 885 $2,039 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $1,918 Jan $1,918 Feb $2,029 Feb $2,029 Mar $1,961 Mar $1,961 Apr $2,039 Apr $2,039 (↑6.3%)
1BR 1 820 $1,859 Active Apr 5 1
Dec $2,158 Dec $2,158 Jan $2,081 Feb $1,938 Feb $1,938 Mar $1,937 Apr $1,859 (↓13.9%)
1BR 1 810 $1,854 Active Apr 6 1
Mar $1,854 Apr $1,854 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 803 $1,849 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $2,089 Mar $1,926 Mar $1,926 Mar $1,861 Mar $1,861 Apr $1,849 Apr $1,849 (↓11.5%)
1BR 1 820 $1,789 Active Apr 5 1
Feb $1,851 Mar $1,851 Mar $1,789 Apr $1,789 (↓3.3%)
1BR 1 785 $1,730 Active Apr 6 1
Apr $1,730
1BR 1 771 $1,700 Active Apr 5 1
Jan $1,594 Mar $1,714 Apr $1,700 (↑6.6%)
1BR 1 684 $1,647 Active Apr 6 1
Feb $1,566 Mar $1,566 Mar $1,566 Mar $1,504 Apr $1,647 Apr $1,647 (↑5.2%)
1BR 1 684 $1,634 Active Apr 6 1
Mar $1,553 Mar $1,501 Apr $1,634 (↑5.2%)
1BR 1 684 $1,634 Active Apr 6 1
Apr $1,634
1BR 1 603 $1,624 Active Apr 6 1
Jan $1,618 Jan $1,618 Feb $1,596 Feb $1,596 Feb $1,739 Feb $1,738 Mar $1,674 Mar $1,674 Apr $1,624 (↑0.4%)
2BR 2 1,182 $2,570 Inactive Mar 16 1
Dec $2,220 Jan $2,219 Jan $2,209 Jan $2,209 Feb $2,099 Feb $2,099 Feb $2,158 Mar $2,570 Mar $2,570 Mar $2,570 (↑15.8%)
2BR 2 1,354 $2,502 Inactive Jun 6 1
Jun $2,502
2BR 2 1,182 $2,501 Inactive Mar 15 1
Jan $2,135 Feb $2,040 Feb $2,040 Feb $2,425 Feb $2,425 Mar $2,501 Mar $2,501 (↑17.1%)
2BR 2 1,320 $2,492 Inactive Mar 15 1
Mar $2,492
2BR 2 1,121 $2,442 Inactive Feb 23 1
Dec $2,508 Jan $2,507 Jan $2,054 Feb $2,054 Feb $2,442 Feb $2,442 (↓2.6%)
2BR 2 1,148 $2,414 Inactive Feb 26 1
Feb $2,414 Feb $2,414 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,121 $2,392 Inactive Dec 27 1
Dec $2,392
2BR 2 1,341 $2,345 Inactive Feb 15 1
Jan $2,345 Feb $2,345 Feb $2,345 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,147 $2,341 Inactive Mar 17 1
Dec $2,392 Feb $1,998 Feb $1,998 Feb $2,325 Mar $2,341 Mar $2,341 (↓2.1%)
2BR 2 1,320 $2,332 Inactive Jan 26 1
Jan $2,332 Jan $2,332 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,121 $2,299 Inactive Apr 3 1
Jan $2,125 Jan $2,125 Feb $2,029 Feb $2,029 Feb $2,414 Mar $2,489 Mar $2,489 Mar $2,299 Apr $2,299 (↑8.2%)
2BR 2 1,182 $2,233 Inactive Mar 17 1
Feb $2,183 Feb $2,183 Mar $2,233 (↑2.3%)
2BR 2 1,182 $2,208 Inactive Mar 16 1
Jan $2,219 Jan $2,209 Feb $2,099 Feb $2,099 Feb $2,512 Mar $2,208 (↓0.5%)
2BR 2 1,148 $2,201 Inactive Jun 6 1
May $2,213 Jun $2,201 (↓0.5%)
2BR 2 1,148 $2,199 Inactive May 26 1
May $2,199
2BR 2 1,182 $2,198 Inactive Jun 6 1
May $2,266 May $2,228 Jun $2,198 (↓3.0%)
2BR 2 1,148 $2,188 Inactive Jun 16 1
May $2,255 May $2,218 May $2,218 Jun $2,188 Jun $2,188 (↓3.0%)
2BR 2 1,182 $2,184 Inactive Jan 27 1
Jan $2,184 Jan $2,184 Jan $2,184 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 988 $2,165 Inactive Apr 3 1
Apr $2,165
2BR 2 1,121 $2,152 Inactive Mar 13 1
Jan $2,153 Jan $2,014 Feb $2,014 Feb $2,014 Feb $2,014 Feb $2,101 Mar $2,152 Mar $2,152 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 803 $2,146 Inactive Dec 21 1
Jun $1,777 Jun $1,812 Dec $2,146 (↑20.8%)
1BR 1 988 $2,137 Inactive Feb 25 1
Feb $2,137 Feb $2,137 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,182 $2,094 Inactive Feb 15 1
Jan $2,190 Jan $2,094 Feb $2,094 Feb $2,094 (↓4.4%)
2BR 2 1,124 $2,077 Inactive Feb 23 1
Jan $2,129 Jan $2,129 Jan $2,129 Feb $2,077 Feb $2,077 Feb $2,077 Feb $2,077 (↓2.4%)
1BR 1 820 $2,072 Inactive Jan 12 1
Dec $2,128 Jan $2,052 Jan $2,072 (↓2.6%)
2BR 2 1,124 $2,048 Inactive Feb 2 1
Feb $2,048
1BR 1 987 $2,047 Inactive Mar 15 1
Dec $2,342 Jan $2,365 Jan $2,365 Jan $2,365 Feb $2,048 Mar $2,047 Mar $2,047 (↓12.6%)
Unit 11443143 1BR 1 684 $2,040 Inactive Oct 12 57
1BR 1 889 $2,039 Inactive Mar 30 1
Jan $1,918 Jan $1,880 Feb $1,880 Feb $1,880 Feb $2,040 Mar $2,039 Mar $1,958 Mar $2,039 (↑6.3%)
1BR 1 885 $2,029 Inactive Feb 19 1
Dec $1,943 Jan $2,212 Jan $2,212 Jan $2,212 Feb $1,876 Feb $1,876 Feb $2,029 (↑4.4%)
2BR 2 1,182 $2,025 Inactive Feb 1 1
Jan $2,145 Jan $2,135 Feb $2,025 (↓5.6%)
Unit 11401739 1BR 1 684 $1,982 Inactive May 24 170
1BR 1 885 $1,961 Inactive Mar 27 1
Mar $2,055 Mar $2,055 Mar $2,055 Mar $1,961 (↓4.6%)
2BR 2 984 $1,945 Inactive Dec 21 1
Dec $1,945
1BR 1 885 $1,910 Inactive Jun 12 1
May $1,874 Jun $1,910 Jun $1,910 (↑1.9%)
1BR 1 885 $1,908 Inactive Feb 17 1
Jan $2,218 Jan $1,908 Feb $1,908 Feb $1,908 (↓14.0%)
1BR 1 885 $1,874 Inactive May 29 1
May $2,049 May $1,874 (↓8.5%)
1BR 1 885 $1,874 Inactive May 22 1
May $1,874
1BR 1 771 $1,844 Inactive Jan 27 1
Jan $1,844 Jan $1,844 Jan $1,844 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 803 $1,780 Inactive Apr 3 1
Feb $1,848 Mar $1,790 Mar $1,790 Apr $1,780 (↓3.7%)
1BR 1 785 $1,768 Inactive Mar 31 1
Mar $1,768
1BR 1 684 $1,742 Inactive Jan 17 77
1BR 1 810 $1,729 Inactive Mar 28 1
Jan $1,628 Feb $1,628 Feb $1,709 Feb $1,708 Mar $1,708 Mar $1,729 (↑6.2%)
1BR 1 810 $1,709 Inactive Mar 17 1
Dec $1,580 Jan $1,580 Jan $1,580 Feb $1,620 Feb $1,620 Feb $1,710 Feb $1,709 Mar $1,709 (↑8.2%)
1BR 1 803 $1,709 Inactive Feb 16 1
Jan $1,709 Feb $1,709 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 684 $1,686 Inactive Dec 21 1
Dec $1,686 Dec $1,686 Dec $1,686 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 785 $1,665 Inactive May 13 1
May $1,665
1BR 1 785 $1,654 Inactive Feb 17 1
Jan $1,912 Jan $1,654 Feb $1,654 Feb $1,654 (↓13.5%)
Unit 8 1BR 1 684 $1,650 Inactive Sep 28 315
1BR 1 810 $1,638 Inactive Jan 9 1
Jan $1,638 Jan $1,638 (↑0.0%)
BR $1,635 Inactive Dec 22 595
1BR 1 684 $1,634 Inactive Mar 29 1
Mar $1,634
1BR 1 771 $1,620 Inactive Feb 17 1
May $1,583 Dec $1,925 Dec $1,925 Jan $1,872 Jan $1,872 Feb $1,620 Feb $1,620 Feb $1,620 (↑2.3%)
1BR 1 810 $1,610 Inactive May 19 1
May $1,701 May $1,610 (↓5.3%)
1BR 1 684 $1,604 Inactive Mar 25 1
Mar $1,604 Mar $1,604 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 810 $1,579 Inactive Jan 26 1
Jan $1,579 Jan $1,579 Jan $1,579 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 785 $1,578 Inactive Feb 9 1
Dec $1,584 Dec $1,579 Jan $1,824 Jan $1,824 Jan $1,824 Jan $1,578 Feb $1,578 (↓0.4%)
1BR 1 684 $1,559 Inactive Mar 25 1
Mar $1,559
1BR 1 684 $1,554 Inactive Feb 23 1
Feb $1,554 Feb $1,554 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 785 $1,531 Inactive Feb 16 1
Jan $1,578 Jan $1,578 Feb $1,531 Feb $1,531 Feb $1,531 (↓3.0%)
1BR 1 684 $1,530 Inactive May 13 1
May $1,530
Unit 2620 1BR 1 810 $1,480 Inactive Sep 29 37
1BR 1 684 $1,443 Inactive Dec 27 1
Dec $1,443 Dec $1,443 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 684 $1,438 Inactive Jan 23 1
Jan $1,438 Jan $1,438 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 684 $1,423 Inactive Jun 15 1
Jun $1,423
1BR 1 684 $1,417 Inactive Jan 9 1
Jan $1,417 Jan $1,417 (↑0.0%)
Model Apartment - B2 2BR 2 1,182 Inactive Mar 24
A1 1BR 1 688 Inactive Mar 24
A1 Loft 1BR 1 885 Inactive Mar 24
A2 1BR 1 771 Inactive Mar 24
A3 1BR 1 810 Inactive Mar 24
B1 2BR 2 1,147 Inactive Mar 24
B3 Loft 2BR 2 1,639 Inactive Mar 24
B4 2BR 2 984 Inactive Mar 24
Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

Affordability and Demand Mismatch in Urban Core

The 1-mile radius presents a critical tension: at $1,990.80/month rent and 25.8% affordability ratio, the immediate neighborhood is stretched relative to its $72.7K median household income, yet 86.5% renter concentration signals captive, inelastic demand. This high renter base likely reflects limited ownership pathways rather than preference—the median home value of $234.3K is accessible but the income distribution skews lower, with 28.5% of households earning under $50K. Expanding to the 3- and 5-mile rings reveals materially stronger support: both show 20%+ affordability ratios, higher median incomes ($90.1K–$95.5K), and substantial high-income tiers (40.3% and 39.6% earning $100K+), though renter concentration drops to 61.9% and 56.8%. The property benefits from deep affluent renter demand in the broader market but depends on 1-mile residents with limited income cushion—a refinancing or rate shock risk if turnover concentrates among lower-income cohorts unable to absorb rent growth.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago

1-Mile Radius

Population
22,692
Households
12,577
Avg Household Size
1.85
Median HH Income
$72,731
Median Home Value
$234,332
Median Rent
$1,564
% Renter Occupied
86.5%
Affordability
25.8% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

3-Mile Radius

Population
124,939
Households
60,121
Avg Household Size
2.15
Median HH Income
$90,100
Median Home Value
$400,143
Median Rent
$1,537
% Renter Occupied
61.9%
Affordability
20.5% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
372,067
Households
163,329
Avg Household Size
2.4
Median HH Income
$95,491
Median Home Value
$406,760
Median Rent
$1,604
% Renter Occupied
56.8%
Affordability
20.2% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 6 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix

The unit mix data is incomplete and problematic for investment analysis. The property reports 69 units in the mix breakdown (40 one-BR, 29 two-BR) but lists only 20 units in active listings (12 one-BR, 8 two-BR), leaving 255 units unaccounted for—a red flag for either data integrity issues or significant offline inventory. The two-bedroom rent premium of $515/month ($2,300 vs. $1,785) tracks appropriately with the 46.6% larger unit size (1,126 vs. 769 sqft), but without visibility into the remaining 78.7% of the portfolio, the true rent and demographic profile cannot be assessed.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago

Estimated from 69 listed units (21.3% of 324 total)

1BR 40 units
2BR 29 units
Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities

Pet Policy

Pet-friendly community. Jewel on Landmark utilizes Pet Screening to screen household pets, validate reasonable accommodation requests for assistance animals, and confirm every resident understands pet policies.

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Appraisal Summary – Jefferson Landmark Apartments

The property has appreciated modestly at 0.7% YoY to $69.5M, reflecting flat market conditions for recent-vintage multifamily. Per-unit appraised value stands at $214.4K ($69.5M ÷ 324 units), reasonable for a 2017 asset but lacking momentum. Land represents only 6.2% of total value ($4.3M), typical for a stabilized building with limited redevelopment upside—value is locked in operating cash flow, not land arbitrage. The single appraisal point prevents trend analysis, but the minimal appreciation suggests either market saturation in this submarket or that the asset is pricing in normalized NOI rather than yield compression gains.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $69,453,300 +0.7%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Rating deterioration signals operational distress. The 70-basis-point decline from 4.2 to 3.5 over the past six months reflects a sharp reversal, driven by a spike in 1-star reviews (90 total, concentrated in recent months). Maintenance and facility condition dominate negative feedback—elevators "broken or about to break down," stains throughout common areas, inadequate housekeeping—alongside noise complaints and management instability (three leadership changes in one year). The leasing team (particularly Antoinette) generates outsized 5-star praise that masks operational failures; resident reviews from tenants beyond six months reveal the disconnect, citing move-in competence undermined by deteriorating asset quality and enforcement. This review pattern suggests management churn has eroded service standards and preventive maintenance discipline, materially weakening the investment case unless near-term operational restructuring is planned.

AI analysis · Updated 3 days ago

Rating Distribution

5★
363 (70%)
4★
25 (5%)
3★
12 (2%)
2★
25 (5%)
1★
90 (17%)

515 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

Francine Howard ★★★★★ Feb 2026

Llevo 3 años viviendo en el edificio y me gusta que atienden cualquier requerimiento con relación a mi apartamento de manera rápida y efectiva.

Owner response

Hello, we're delighted to read about your experience with us. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you need any further assistance.

Micha Hilane ★★★★☆ Local Guide Feb 2026

I had a really great experience working with Antoinette.
From the beginning, she was welcoming, knowledgeable, and very helpful. She took the time to answer all of my questions thoroughly and made the entire process feel smooth. Really appreciated how she followed up when she said she would and was super patient in my indecisive moments lol! Moving to a new place (fingers crossed) is overwhelming, but Antoinette made it feel welcoming and exciting!

Owner response

Hi Micha, it gives us great pleasure to read about your experience with us! Don't hesitate to reach out if there is ever anything else we can help you with!

Brandon Barker ★☆☆☆☆ Feb 2026

The application work is unreasonably intensive. Beyond providing proof of salary, I was required to provide my bank account login information to a 3rd party company called finicity. To be clear not just my account and routing number… they required my actual username and password and when I asked if there was a different way to verify my bank information I was told this was my only option. After doing that they required that I find a guarantor to sign the lease and also required all of his bank login information. The application process took 10 days in total and was made difficult by the complex being understaffed meaning that 70% of the time I called the office I got the useless AI assistant.

On move in, I noticed a strong sulfur smell. I had to call maintenance 3 times before they actually fixed the smell. Once the sulfur smell was gone it was replaced by a much more mild but still unpleasant odor. I’ve called maintenance several times but the smell persists. I finally contacted the property manager and had her come investigate. She told me that she didn’t smell anything and suggested that the smell was simply in my head. This was very frustrating to hear.

In defense of maintenance, they always arrive the same day that I call. I just wish I could be provided with better assistance to address this issue.

I’ve never had problems like this anywhere else I lived. I’m finding myself wishing I had chosen a different apartment complex in Dallas.

Owner response

Hello Brandon, we are deeply concerned to learn of the situation you have described. Our Property Manager would like to address your concerns directly. Please reach out to us at (972) 960-1465 so we can research this matter further.

Vanessa Martinez ★★★★★ Dec 2025

La muchacha Antoniette muy amable y dedicada con los clientes un ambiente maravilloso y el lugar es hermoso. Agradecida por todo y espero que nuestra aplicación sea aprobada

Owner response

Vanessa, thank you for your positive review! Don't hesitate to contact us if you need any further assistance.

Bamidele Yusuf ★★★★★ Dec 2025

Owner response

Hello Bamidele, thank you for the positive review! Please give us a call or stop by our office if you ever need anything!

Showing 5 of 515 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet