THE MANSIONS AT MERCER CROSSING

1850 MERCER PKWY, FARMERS BRANCH, TX, 75234

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Mid-Rise 410 units Built 2018 4 stories ★ 3.9 (239 reviews) 🚶 7 Car-Dependent 🚌 26 Some Transit 🚲 35 Somewhat Bikeable

$68,500,000

2025 Appraised Value

↑ 2.2% from prior year

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: THE MANSIONS AT MERCER CROSSING

The property trades at a material 100bp cap rate premium to submarket (5.31% vs. 4.31%) with NOI underperformance of ~$80/unit—a value-add signal undermined by structural location constraints and operational friction that limit upside capture. The 410-unit, 2018-vintage asset sits in car-dependent Farmers Branch (Walk Score 7) competing on affordability rather than lifestyle, capping pricing power well below comparable Class B+ urban-core assets; asking rents of $1.481K lag submarket by 7.2% and remain 15–20% below walkable Dallas corridors. Tenant satisfaction data reveals systemic operational drag—pest infestation, aggressive ancillary fees, and quality control failures dominate negative reviews—with satisfaction concentrated among leasing personnel rather than asset fundamentals, signaling execution risk and renewal pressure. The photo analysis confirms only selective value-add potential across ~9 builder-grade units; 31 already modernized units and fresh amenities limit repositioning upside. Pass on acquisition; recommend watch-list if cap rate compresses below 4.8% or if near-term staff stability and pest remediation can be independently verified—currently, the 100bp spread reflects genuine operational and market headwinds, not arbitrage opportunity.

AI overview · Updated about 21 hours ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

Class B+ Property with Selective Value-Add; Most Units Already Modernized

The 410-unit community (built 2018) presents a bifurcated finish profile that limits upside potential. 31 units show upgraded finishes while 9 remain builder-grade, indicating a partial rather than full renovation cycle—likely targeting turnover rather than a wholesale repositioning. Kitchen finishes cluster around white shaker/slab cabinetry with quartz or granite countertops ($9 of 14 analyzed countertops are quartz) and mid-range stainless appliances (Samsung/LG tier), suggesting 2020–2023 refresh work. The 56.8% "excellent" condition rating and fresh paint across 61.0% of observed surfaces confirm no major deferred maintenance, but the absence of premium appliances (Bosch, Wolf) or luxury finishes (marble, waterfall islands beyond one unit) caps repositioning upside. Amenities (resort-style pool with lane dividers, modern fitness center with linear lighting) are appropriate for the Class B+ segment but not differentiating. The value-add play is limited to the ~9 builder-grade units and selective exterior refreshes; incremental rent growth will depend on market strength rather than substantial physical improvement.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago

/

AI Analysis

Location severely constrains upside. Walk Score of 7 and transit score of 26 signal a car-dependent, transit-poor submarket incompatible with the $1,481 average rent—this pricing is 15–20% below comparable Class B properties in walkable Dallas corridors. Farmers Branch's distance from employment centers and minimal amenity density will ceiling tenant quality and pricing power; the property is effectively competing on affordability rather than lifestyle, limiting rent growth and limiting appeal to institutional capital seeking urban infill exposure. The 410-unit size and current rent level suggest repositioning toward workforce housing or a strategic exit before further rent compression in auto-dependent suburbs.

AI analysis · Updated about 2 months ago
Distance Name Category
📍 11.5 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Zero pipeline competition masks underlying submarket weakness. With 0.0% new supply in the pipeline and no active nearby construction, this 410-unit asset faces no near-term occupancy pressure from new deliveries. However, the deteriorating submarket vacancy trend suggests headwinds are structural rather than supply-driven—likely demand-side softening or competitive pressure from existing stock, making the absence of new supply a neutral rather than bullish indicator for rent growth prospects.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago
🏗️ 0 permits within 3 mi
0% pipeline

No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles

Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

The Mansions at Mercer Crossing trades at a 100bp cap rate premium to its Dallas submarket (5.31% vs. 4.31%), signaling a value-add or below-market positioning despite 2018 vintage. NOI per unit of $8.87K sits below the submarket's implied $8.95K ($208.2K price/unit ÷ 4.31%), confirming the property is underperforming relative to comparable Class A/B stock. The 50% opex ratio is healthy, but the 20bp vacancy leakage and tax burden of $4.18K per unit suggest either below-market rents or operational drag. At the implied 5.31% cap, this asset trades $13.2M above its $68.5M appraised value, indicating either recent downward valuation pressure or a seller willing to exit at a cap rate floor.

AI analysis · Updated about 2 months ago

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
Sale $/Unit
Value YoY
+2.2%
Implied Cap Rate
5.31%
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
$7,286,520/yr
Est. Vacancy
0.2%
Submarket Vac.
5.5%
Eff. Gross Income
$7,271,947/yr
OpEx Ratio
50%
Est. NOI
$3,635,974/yr
NOI/Unit
$8,868/yr

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
$4,177/yr
Est. DSCR

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
4.31%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$208,197
Rent/SF
$2.04/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

THE MANSIONS AT MERCER CROSSING is a 410-unit, four-story mid-rise completed in 2018 in Farmers Branch with brick and tilt-wall construction. The 578.5K SF property yields 392.1K SF of net leasable area at average quality and condition, with unit finishes reflecting mid-market positioning (garden tubs, custom cabinets, chef kitchens, fitness center, pool). Located in a car-dependent area (Walk Score 7) with no specified parking data, though on-site parking likely required given suburban Dallas context. Utility structure and pet policy are unstated.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago

Property Details

Account #
242417500A0020000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Mid-Rise
Construction
C-MASONRY, BLOCK, TILT-WALL
Quality
AVERAGE
Condition
AVERAGE
Stories
4
Gross Building Area
578,538 SF
Net Leasable Area
392,070 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
October 23, 2017
Place ID
ChIJuyDWCkQnTIYRhMMLDoulaVw
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
3 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
WRIA 2017 2 LP
Mailing Address
GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 750507803
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Performance

The property is materially underperforming its 1-bed comp set: asking rents at $1.481K versus submarket benchmark of $1.595K represent a 7.2% discount. Minimal listing activity (1 unit) and near-zero availability suggest either strong occupancy or a stalled leasing environment; the flat snapshot data prevents velocity assessment. The absence of concession data and limited rent history (single August 2025 data point) restricts analysis of recent market-rate adjustments relative to the 5.3% submarket growth. Full rent matrix by unit type and time-series pricing data are needed to determine if the discount reflects genuine competitive weakness or simply a lagging data capture.

AI analysis · Updated about 21 hours ago
Submarket Rent Growth
+5.3% trailing 12mo
📊 Nearby properties
Vacancy Trend
Deteriorating
📊 RentCast zip-level data
Submarket Rent/SF
$2.04/sf
📊 Nearby properties

Rent Trends

Estimated Occupancy

Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units

Available Units Over Time

Latest Scrape (Mar 25, 2026)

Available
1 units

Fees

Application: Admin: Pet Deposit: Pet Rent Monthly:
🏠 1 active listing | 1BR avg $1,481 (mkt $1,595 ↓7% ) | Trend: No data
Unit Beds Baths Sqft Rent Status Listed Days
1BR 1 719 $1,481 Active Aug 15 235
Aug $1,481
Apt 4815 1BR 1 737 $1,470 Inactive Sep 29 37
Pulse (1X1) 1BR 1 811 Inactive Mar 25
Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

The 66.8% renter concentration within 3 miles signals strong demand depth for the property's $1,481 rent level, which represents a 19.6% affordability ratio against the $90.3K median household income—well within acceptable thresholds for multifamily operators. The income distribution skews affluent: 44.3% of 3-mile households earn $100K+, indicating this is an upscale renter market rather than workforce housing, supported by the 5-mile median of $97.4K. However, the 3-mile market shows a notable 6.2 percentage point premium in renter concentration versus the 5-mile ring (66.8% vs. 60.6%), suggesting urban core demand is tighter and the property may face greater competition from for-sale inventory in the suburban periphery.

AI analysis · Updated about 2 months ago

3-Mile Radius

Population
83,871
Households
34,344
Avg Household Size
2.55
Median HH Income
$90,282
Median Home Value
$387,588
Median Rent
$1,653
% Renter Occupied
66.8%
Affordability
22.0% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
249,336
Households
98,291
Avg Household Size
2.65
Median HH Income
$97,438
Median Home Value
$364,353
Median Rent
$1,643
% Renter Occupied
60.6%
Affordability
20.2% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 0 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix

Data appears corrupted or incomplete. The unit mix shows only 2 one-bedroom units across a 410-unit property, with listings data confirming just 1 unit in the MLS comp set at $1.481K. This configuration is not credible for a 2018-built Class A asset and suggests either a data ingestion error or the property detail page is displaying a filtered/partial view. Recommend validating source data before proceeding with underwriting.

AI analysis · Updated about 2 months ago

Estimated from 2 listed units (0.5% of 410 total)

1BR 2 units
Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Appraisal Interpretation: The Mansions at Mercer Crossing

Current appraised value of $68.5M translates to $167.1K per unit—modest for a 2018 vintage asset, suggesting either secondary market positioning or below-average unit mix. Land represents only 5.4% of total value ($3.7M), indicating minimal redevelopment optionality; the 94.6% improvement allocation reflects a stabilized operating asset with limited conversion upside. The 2.2% YoY appreciation is anemic for a seven-year-old property in a tight multifamily market, signaling either flat operational performance or conservative underwriting—single-year data prevents trend assessment, but the modest growth warrants scrutiny on rent growth and expense inflation relative to market comps.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $68,500,000 +2.2%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

The Mansions at Mercer Crossing exhibits a bifurcated resident experience that undermines investment quality. The 3.9 rating masks extreme polarization: 68.6% of 239 reviews are 5-stars while 22.6% are 1-stars, with a slight 10 basis point decline over the past 6 months (4.1% → 4.0%). Pest infestation (roaches, bugs requiring unit "bombing") and noise complaints dominate negative reviews alongside aggressive ancillary fees ($100 charge for lost amenity bracelet); these issues surface repeatedly within 30-day move-in windows, signaling systemic maintenance and quality control failures rather than isolated incidents. Conversely, overwhelming praise centers exclusively on leasing agent "Julian" and front-desk staff—a red flag that property satisfaction derives from personalities rather than asset fundamentals, creating execution risk if key staff turns over. This review profile suggests operational friction and deferred maintenance that will pressure renewal rates and cap-rate assumptions.

AI analysis · Updated 12 days ago

Rating Distribution

5★
164 (68%)
4★
6 (2%)
3★
6 (2%)
2★
11 (5%)
1★
54 (22%)

241 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

连婷 ★★★★☆ Feb 2026

I’ve been living here for about a month now, and overall my experience has been 4 out of 5 stars so far.

First of all, I really want to thank Alli for all her help. She is incredibly friendly, welcoming, and has a great sense of humor. She patiently answered every single one of my questions and made the whole moving process much less stressful. I truly appreciate her guidance. Thanks to her suggestion, I chose a south-facing unit. Even though it overlooks the parking lot, the natural sunlight is amazing, and I absolutely love my unit.

The apartment community overall is nice, but there are a few ongoing issues. The elevators break down quite often. The garage gate has been broken since I moved in, and parking can get very full. If I get home after 9 PM, I often have to park on the open-air 6th floor. The sound insulation between floors is also not the best — I can clearly hear upstairs neighbors walking, moving furniture, and playing music.

That said, I’m happy with my unit and grateful for Alli’s support throughout the process. 😊

Queen ★★☆☆☆ Local Guide Feb 2026

My uber eats order got delivered to the front office because my uber driver refused to look at the instructions, a lady at the front office spoke to me that it was delivered to the front door and to come pick it up, i got there in less than 10 minutes because i live opposite this apartment, the same front desk lady had taken my order in and they had closed, i never got my item till this day!

Abigail Ward ★★★★★ Jan 2026

Moving can be stressful, but Alli made my experience at The Mansions at Mercer Crossing feel easy and reassuring. She was kind, patient, and really listened to what I was looking for. I never felt pressured, just supported. It’s rare to find someone who makes you feel genuinely cared for during a leasing process. This community is lucky to have her.

Owner response

Hi Abigail! We know that moving can be stressful, but we're so glad to hear that your experience was made easy and reassuring thanks to team members like Alli. Please feel free to reach out with any questions! We look forward to seeing you again soon.

shanti kande ★☆☆☆☆ Local Guide Jan 2026

I live in apt 2201 and the uncivilized group of people living above us in 2301 do not have any civil sense that people live below need to sleep. They keep dragging furniture EVERY night, stomping, that wakes me up from sleep, since weeks until late hours even at 1:30pm. I have complained to the front office at the same time the incident happened calling after hours and leaving voicemail, but no resolution. Called and complained to the front office during the day, no resolution. This is 3am today, now and these idiots are making sounds. who visits apartments at these hours?? They have been nothing but pain since they moved in. I’ll be calling cops every single day from now if they don’t stop, since the front office is not taking any serious action.

The owner have replied to my previous review to contact the office and mentioned that they strive to provide comfortable living, but that’s all lies. No one cares for people here. LITERALLY.

By the way, Elevator is FINALLY Fixed (i hope) after being broken down for over 1 1/2 months. I suffered taking stairs all these weeks. They sent a joyful email few weeks back that it’s fixed and the same night it broke again but since few days it’s been working fine. I read reviews about elevator broken often but i thought it can’t be real. Now i know it IS.

Maintenance is not great, only the leasing office is kept well. Can’t call these LUXURY apartments.

Entry to garage has never worked since i moved in on December 05, 2025. So, not sure what is the security for your vehicles. Upon asking the front office guy said it has recently been broke and are working on fixing it. I asked since when, he said 3 weeks. They are very Well trained to LIE about everything. I wish these are honest people.

Owner response

Shanti, we sincerely regret to learn about your ongoing frustrations with your upstairs neighbors. Please try reaching out to our team once more so we can address the situation and get your stay back on track. Thank you.

Sneaky Sabotage ★☆☆☆☆ Jan 2026

Worst 9 months ever. Then had to pay 500 for repainting and I lost a rubber band bracelet for their amenities and they charged me 100 bucks

Owner response

Hello, we regret to hear about your frustrations with the move-out process. Our team aims to maintain transparency with residents about possible charges. Please contact us if you think you were charged unfairly; we would be glad to address these concerns and others you may have.

Showing 5 of 241 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet