THE MANSIONS AT MERCER CROSSING

1850 MERCER PKWY, FARMERS BRANCH, TX, 75234

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Mid-Rise 410 units Built 2018 4 stories ★ 3.9 (239 reviews) 🚶 7 Car-Dependent 🚌 26 Some Transit 🚲 35 Somewhat Bikeable

$68,500,000

2025 Appraised Value

↑ 2.2% from prior year

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: THE MANSIONS AT MERCER CROSSING

The 100bp cap rate premium to submarket (5.31% vs. 4.31%) signals operational underperformance, not opportunity—this 410-unit 2018-vintage asset is trading below its $68.5M appraisal and generating $8.87K NOI per unit well below Class A/B comps, despite a favorable 66.8% renter concentration and $90.3K median household income in the 3-mile ring. Bimodal Google reviews (3.9 rating driven by 68.6% five-star/22.6% one-star split) reveal systemic pest infestations and aggressive fee enforcement rather than operational stability, with pest complaints spanning January–December and tenant churn signals masking superficial leasing velocity. The property's Walk Score of 7 and car-dependent Farmers Branch location severely constrain pricing power and tenant quality; current $1,481 rent reflects 15–20% discounting versus comparable walkable Dallas corridors, limiting rent growth prospects. Partial value-add (31 of 410 units upgraded, most finishes already in place) and zero near-term supply competition offer marginal upside that does not justify the operational red flags and fundamental location constraints. Pass—the combination of below-market NOI, documented maintenance failures, and structural demand headwinds in an auto-dependent suburb makes this a below-risk-adjusted-return acquisition target; recommend monitoring only if seller reprices to 5.8%+ cap rate or if operational team replacement demonstrates material pest control remediation.

AI overview · Updated 8 days ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

Class B+ Property with Selective Value-Add; Most Units Already Modernized

The 410-unit community (built 2018) presents a bifurcated finish profile that limits upside potential. 31 units show upgraded finishes while 9 remain builder-grade, indicating a partial rather than full renovation cycle—likely targeting turnover rather than a wholesale repositioning. Kitchen finishes cluster around white shaker/slab cabinetry with quartz or granite countertops ($9 of 14 analyzed countertops are quartz) and mid-range stainless appliances (Samsung/LG tier), suggesting 2020–2023 refresh work. The 56.8% "excellent" condition rating and fresh paint across 61.0% of observed surfaces confirm no major deferred maintenance, but the absence of premium appliances (Bosch, Wolf) or luxury finishes (marble, waterfall islands beyond one unit) caps repositioning upside. Amenities (resort-style pool with lane dividers, modern fitness center with linear lighting) are appropriate for the Class B+ segment but not differentiating. The value-add play is limited to the ~9 builder-grade units and selective exterior refreshes; incremental rent growth will depend on market strength rather than substantial physical improvement.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago

/

AI Analysis

Location severely constrains upside. Walk Score of 7 and transit score of 26 signal a car-dependent, transit-poor submarket incompatible with the $1,481 average rent—this pricing is 15–20% below comparable Class B properties in walkable Dallas corridors. Farmers Branch's distance from employment centers and minimal amenity density will ceiling tenant quality and pricing power; the property is effectively competing on affordability rather than lifestyle, limiting rent growth and limiting appeal to institutional capital seeking urban infill exposure. The 410-unit size and current rent level suggest repositioning toward workforce housing or a strategic exit before further rent compression in auto-dependent suburbs.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago
Distance Name Category
📍 11.5 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Zero pipeline competition masks underlying submarket weakness. With 0.0% new supply in the pipeline and no active nearby construction, this 410-unit asset faces no near-term occupancy pressure from new deliveries. However, the deteriorating submarket vacancy trend suggests headwinds are structural rather than supply-driven—likely demand-side softening or competitive pressure from existing stock, making the absence of new supply a neutral rather than bullish indicator for rent growth prospects.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago
🏗️ 0 permits within 3 mi
0% pipeline

No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles

Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

The Mansions at Mercer Crossing trades at a 100bp cap rate premium to its Dallas submarket (5.31% vs. 4.31%), signaling a value-add or below-market positioning despite 2018 vintage. NOI per unit of $8.87K sits below the submarket's implied $8.95K ($208.2K price/unit ÷ 4.31%), confirming the property is underperforming relative to comparable Class A/B stock. The 50% opex ratio is healthy, but the 20bp vacancy leakage and tax burden of $4.18K per unit suggest either below-market rents or operational drag. At the implied 5.31% cap, this asset trades $13.2M above its $68.5M appraised value, indicating either recent downward valuation pressure or a seller willing to exit at a cap rate floor.

AI analysis · Updated 8 days ago

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
Sale $/Unit
Value YoY
+2.2%
Implied Cap Rate
5.31%
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
$7,286,520/yr
Est. Vacancy
0.2%
Submarket Vac.
5.5%
Eff. Gross Income
$7,271,947/yr
OpEx Ratio
50%
Est. NOI
$3,635,974/yr
NOI/Unit
$8,868/yr

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
$4,177/yr
Est. DSCR

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
4.31%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$208,197
Rent/SF
$2.04/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

THE MANSIONS AT MERCER CROSSING is a 410-unit, four-story mid-rise completed in 2018 in Farmers Branch with brick and tilt-wall construction. The 578.5K SF property yields 392.1K SF of net leasable area at average quality and condition, with unit finishes reflecting mid-market positioning (garden tubs, custom cabinets, chef kitchens, fitness center, pool). Located in a car-dependent area (Walk Score 7) with no specified parking data, though on-site parking likely required given suburban Dallas context. Utility structure and pet policy are unstated.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago

Property Details

Account #
242417500A0020000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Mid-Rise
Construction
C-MASONRY, BLOCK, TILT-WALL
Quality
AVERAGE
Condition
AVERAGE
Stories
4
Gross Building Area
578,538 SF
Net Leasable Area
392,070 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
October 23, 2017
Place ID
ChIJuyDWCkQnTIYRhMMLDoulaVw
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
about 2 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
WRIA 2017 2 LP
Mailing Address
GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 750507803
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Performance

Data Quality Issue: This property dataset is severely incomplete—only 1 active listing across 410 units, no rent history beyond a single August 2025 data point, and snapshots lack pricing detail. The $1,481 average rent appears to reflect a single 1-bedroom unit rather than portfolio-wide occupancy or pricing trends. Without multi-month rent progression, concession tracking, or vacancy trend data, no reliable rental performance analysis is possible. Recommend requesting full lease roll and 12-month pricing/availability history before underwriting.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago
Submarket Rent Growth
📊 Nearby properties
Vacancy Trend
Deteriorating
📊 RentCast zip-level data
Submarket Rent/SF
$2.04/sf
📊 Nearby properties

Rent Trends

Estimated Occupancy

Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units

Available Units Over Time

Latest Scrape (Mar 25, 2026)

Available
1 units

Fees

Application: Admin: Pet Deposit: Pet Rent Monthly:
🏠 1 active listing | 1BR avg $1,481 (mkt $1,595 ↓7% ) | Trend: No data
Unit Beds Baths Sqft Rent Status Listed Days
1BR 1 719 $1,481 Active Aug 15 235
Aug $1,481
Apt 4815 1BR 1 737 $1,470 Inactive Sep 29 37
Pulse (1X1) 1BR 1 811 Inactive Mar 25
Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

The 66.8% renter concentration within 3 miles signals strong demand depth for the property's $1,481 rent level, which represents a 19.6% affordability ratio against the $90.3K median household income—well within acceptable thresholds for multifamily operators. The income distribution skews affluent: 44.3% of 3-mile households earn $100K+, indicating this is an upscale renter market rather than workforce housing, supported by the 5-mile median of $97.4K. However, the 3-mile market shows a notable 6.2 percentage point premium in renter concentration versus the 5-mile ring (66.8% vs. 60.6%), suggesting urban core demand is tighter and the property may face greater competition from for-sale inventory in the suburban periphery.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago

3-Mile Radius

Population
83,871
Households
34,344
Avg Household Size
2.55
Median HH Income
$90,282
Median Home Value
$387,588
Median Rent
$1,653
% Renter Occupied
66.8%
Affordability
22.0% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
249,336
Households
98,291
Avg Household Size
2.65
Median HH Income
$97,438
Median Home Value
$364,353
Median Rent
$1,643
% Renter Occupied
60.6%
Affordability
20.2% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 0 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix

Data appears corrupted or incomplete. The unit mix shows only 2 one-bedroom units across a 410-unit property, with listings data confirming just 1 unit in the MLS comp set at $1.481K. This configuration is not credible for a 2018-built Class A asset and suggests either a data ingestion error or the property detail page is displaying a filtered/partial view. Recommend validating source data before proceeding with underwriting.

AI analysis · Updated 9 days ago

Estimated from 2 listed units (0.5% of 410 total)

1BR 2 units
Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Appraisal Interpretation: The Mansions at Mercer Crossing

Current appraised value of $68.5M translates to $167.1K per unit—modest for a 2018 vintage asset, suggesting either secondary market positioning or below-average unit mix. Land represents only 5.4% of total value ($3.7M), indicating minimal redevelopment optionality; the 94.6% improvement allocation reflects a stabilized operating asset with limited conversion upside. The 2.2% YoY appreciation is anemic for a seven-year-old property in a tight multifamily market, signaling either flat operational performance or conservative underwriting—single-year data prevents trend assessment, but the modest growth warrants scrutiny on rent growth and expense inflation relative to market comps.

AI analysis · Updated 22 days ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $68,500,000 +2.2%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Bimodal review distribution masks operational deficiencies. The 3.9 rating reflects extreme polarization—68.6% five-star reviews (mostly leasing staff praise for "Julian") versus 22.6% one-star ratings citing pest infestations, noise complaints, and aggressive fee enforcement—rather than a genuinely mid-tier property. The recent 6-month uptick to 4.0 is driven entirely by leasing-phase satisfaction; resident experience reviews cluster in the one- and five-star buckets with negligible middle-ground, signaling either rapid tenant churn or selective positive bias from move-in momentum. Material pest and enforcement issues undermine thesis stability. Multiple independent January–December complaints about cockroach infestations, rodents, and inadequate maintenance response, paired with examples of $100 pet fee charges and $500 paint fees, suggest systemic operational lapses that could inflate turnover and depress NOI regardless of leasing velocity.

AI analysis · Updated 15 days ago

Rating Distribution

5★
164 (68%)
4★
6 (2%)
3★
6 (2%)
2★
11 (5%)
1★
54 (22%)

241 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

连婷 ★★★★☆ Feb 2026

I’ve been living here for about a month now, and overall my experience has been 4 out of 5 stars so far.

First of all, I really want to thank Alli for all her help. She is incredibly friendly, welcoming, and has a great sense of humor. She patiently answered every single one of my questions and made the whole moving process much less stressful. I truly appreciate her guidance. Thanks to her suggestion, I chose a south-facing unit. Even though it overlooks the parking lot, the natural sunlight is amazing, and I absolutely love my unit.

The apartment community overall is nice, but there are a few ongoing issues. The elevators break down quite often. The garage gate has been broken since I moved in, and parking can get very full. If I get home after 9 PM, I often have to park on the open-air 6th floor. The sound insulation between floors is also not the best — I can clearly hear upstairs neighbors walking, moving furniture, and playing music.

That said, I’m happy with my unit and grateful for Alli’s support throughout the process. 😊

Queen ★★☆☆☆ Local Guide Feb 2026

My uber eats order got delivered to the front office because my uber driver refused to look at the instructions, a lady at the front office spoke to me that it was delivered to the front door and to come pick it up, i got there in less than 10 minutes because i live opposite this apartment, the same front desk lady had taken my order in and they had closed, i never got my item till this day!

Abigail Ward ★★★★★ Jan 2026

Moving can be stressful, but Alli made my experience at The Mansions at Mercer Crossing feel easy and reassuring. She was kind, patient, and really listened to what I was looking for. I never felt pressured, just supported. It’s rare to find someone who makes you feel genuinely cared for during a leasing process. This community is lucky to have her.

Owner response

Hi Abigail! We know that moving can be stressful, but we're so glad to hear that your experience was made easy and reassuring thanks to team members like Alli. Please feel free to reach out with any questions! We look forward to seeing you again soon.

shanti kande ★☆☆☆☆ Local Guide Jan 2026

I live in apt 2201 and the uncivilized group of people living above us in 2301 do not have any civil sense that people live below need to sleep. They keep dragging furniture EVERY night, stomping, that wakes me up from sleep, since weeks until late hours even at 1:30pm. I have complained to the front office at the same time the incident happened calling after hours and leaving voicemail, but no resolution. Called and complained to the front office during the day, no resolution. This is 3am today, now and these idiots are making sounds. who visits apartments at these hours?? They have been nothing but pain since they moved in. I’ll be calling cops every single day from now if they don’t stop, since the front office is not taking any serious action.

The owner have replied to my previous review to contact the office and mentioned that they strive to provide comfortable living, but that’s all lies. No one cares for people here. LITERALLY.

By the way, Elevator is FINALLY Fixed (i hope) after being broken down for over 1 1/2 months. I suffered taking stairs all these weeks. They sent a joyful email few weeks back that it’s fixed and the same night it broke again but since few days it’s been working fine. I read reviews about elevator broken often but i thought it can’t be real. Now i know it IS.

Maintenance is not great, only the leasing office is kept well. Can’t call these LUXURY apartments.

Entry to garage has never worked since i moved in on December 05, 2025. So, not sure what is the security for your vehicles. Upon asking the front office guy said it has recently been broke and are working on fixing it. I asked since when, he said 3 weeks. They are very Well trained to LIE about everything. I wish these are honest people.

Owner response

Shanti, we sincerely regret to learn about your ongoing frustrations with your upstairs neighbors. Please try reaching out to our team once more so we can address the situation and get your stay back on track. Thank you.

Sneaky Sabotage ★☆☆☆☆ Jan 2026

Worst 9 months ever. Then had to pay 500 for repainting and I lost a rubber band bracelet for their amenities and they charged me 100 bucks

Owner response

Hello, we regret to hear about your frustrations with the move-out process. Our team aims to maintain transparency with residents about possible charges. Please contact us if you think you were charged unfairly; we would be glad to address these concerns and others you may have.

Showing 5 of 241 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet