6165 RIDGE CENTER DR, DALLAS, TX
$56,395,520
2025 Appraised Value
Jefferson Cedar Ridge presents a valuation disconnect that signals overpricing relative to operational realities and market fundamentals. The $72.9M acquisition price sits $16.5M (29.3%) above the $56.4M appraisal and commands a $202.6K/unit premium to submarket comparables, yet the property delivers only $8.2K NOI/unit—unremarkable for a 2022 Class A asset and implying a 4.04% cap rate versus 5.2% market pricing. The recent November 2025 acquisition coinciding with a $47.4M refinance, combined with unknown debt maturity and rate terms, suggests aggressive underwriting assumptions that remain unproven by operational performance.
Tenant demand and unit economics present compounding risks: the $1,245 monthly rent targets households earning ~$57K, but the immediate 1-mile and 3-mile radii show median household incomes of $69.975K and $68.696K respectively—indicating price stretch relative to core walkable neighborhoods. More critically, the unit mix appears heavily skewed to 1-bedroom concentration (58 units documented; no visibility on 2BR/3BR distribution), creating lease-up vulnerability and limiting appeal to family and roommate-seeking cohorts. Google reviews reveal a bimodal satisfaction profile masking operational issues: pest infestation, thin-wall noise complaints, and management instability persist in early 2026 reviews despite recent rating improvements, signaling strong leasing execution but weak property operations and resident retention.
The property's car-dependent location (Walk Score 27, Transit Score 11) and lack of in-unit laundry further constrain competitive positioning for premium rents, while the negligible construction pipeline (1.11% supply threat) offers minimal upside justification for current valuation. Assessment: Pass. The acquisition is priced for rent growth and operational uplift that current market fundamentals and tenant income profiles do not support; the debt structure and valuation timing suggest the seller successfully transferred execution risk to the acquirer.
No notes yet
Welcome to Birchstone Cedar Ridge where life in Dallas is elevated.
Welcome to Birchstone Cedar Ridge where life in Dallas is elevated. Our new one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments combine modern design with refined elements, including gourmet kitchens, luxurious bathrooms, and large closets that provide both style and convenience. The community offers resort-style amenities for every lifestyle. Take a dip in the swimming pool, work out in the fully equipped fitness center, or host friends in the elegant clubhouse. For outdoor adventures, Cedar Ridge Preserve is just 4 miles away, featuring nine miles of trails and the natural beauty of the Hill Country.
Jefferson Cedar Ridge positions as Class A new construction with minimal value-add runway. Built in 2022, the property displays consistent 2020–2023 finishes across all 30 analyzed photos: white/gray shaker cabinetry, light gray quartz countertops, stainless steel LG/Samsung appliances, subway tile backsplash, and vinyl plank flooring in 27 of 30 images graded excellent condition. Amenities—resort-style pool, modern fitness center with accent walls, contemporary clubhouse—align with Class A positioning. The lone red flag: zero washers/dryers noted across units, which may constrain tenant quality and rent growth relative to competing Dallas Class A stock.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Location Profile Misaligned with Rent Positioning
Walk Score of 27 and Transit Score of 11 position Jefferson Cedar Ridge as strictly car-dependent with minimal transit infrastructure—typical of suburban Dallas periphery. At $1,245/month average rent, the property lacks the urban amenity density (walkable restaurants, grocery, fitness clustering) that justifies premium pricing or attracts transit-oriented renters. This score profile suggests the asset targets price-sensitive, car-owning households rather than urban professionals, meaning rent growth depends on supply constraints rather than location desirability. Verify that underwriting reflects suburban lease-up timelines and turnover sensitivity to local employment anchors rather than downtown Dallas proximity.
No notes yet
The pipeline represents negligible supply pressure at 1.11% of existing inventory, but the composition signals limited direct competition. Four nearby permits total only 4 units in active construction, suggesting the filed projects are mixed-use or commercial developments rather than multifamily competitors. The permits span filing dates from 2022–2026 with varied statuses (Revisions Required through Payment Due), indicating stalled or non-residential projects that pose minimal threat to Jefferson Cedar Ridge's occupancy and pricing power. Absent submarket vacancy data, the thin pipeline alone supports near-term rent growth feasibility.
| Distance | Address | Description | Status | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 mi | 7100 W WHEATLAND RD | QTEAM MEETING TBD A 90 unit apartment complex with leasin... | Payment Due | Feb 18, 2026 |
| 2.2 mi | 4324 CORRAL DR | New apartments | Revisions Required | Jul 26, 2022 |
| 2.6 mi | 5595 MOUNTAIN CREEK PKWY | Construction of 234 Units of Multifamily Housing with Gar... | Inspection Phase | Feb 27, 2024 |
| 2.7 mi | 6400 S WESTMORELAND RD | QTEAM MEETING 2.10.2026 (All Day) 216-unit senior living ... | Plan Review | Dec 22, 2025 |
No notes yet
Refinancing risk is acute: The $47.4M loan originated coincidentally with the November 2025 acquisition, suggesting this is a recent refinance or purchase-money debt with unknown maturity and rate terms—critical gaps that prevent DSCR assessment. At $131.7K per unit, leverage sits within market norms for a 2022 asset, but the $16.5M gap between appraised value ($56.4M) and estimated sale price ($72.9M) signals aggressive valuation assumptions, likely tied to unproven NOI growth. The acquisition occurred immediately after origination with no prior ownership history documented, indicating either a portfolio entity acquisition or a rapid repositioning strategy that warrants verification of the underlying business plan and lender's loan-to-value requirements.
No notes yet
Jefferson Cedar Ridge is priced as a stabilized asset well above current market comparables, leaving limited upside. At $202.6K/unit versus $176.8K submarket average and a 4.04% cap rate versus 5.2% market cap, the property commands a 14.6% unit-price premium despite delivering $8.2K NOI/unit—unremarkable for a 2022 Class A brick building. The 45.0% opex ratio is healthy, but the $16.5M gap between appraised value ($56.4M) and asking price ($72.9M) signals either aggressive appraisal timing or a seller unwilling to accept current market pricing. The 119 bps spread between estimated and implied cap rates suggests the listing price doesn't reflect achievable market execution.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $47,400,000 (Nov 2025, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Jefferson Cedar Ridge is a 360-unit garden-style apartment community built in 2022 with wood-frame construction across three stories, delivering 381.6K SF of space with 327.2K SF net leasable area. The property features one- to three-bedroom units with gourmet kitchens and luxury finishes, rated GOOD condition with resort-style amenities including pool, fitness center, dog park, and outdoor grilling areas. Located in Dallas with a Walk Score of 27, the community permits up to two pets with breed restrictions, while parking type and utility inclusions are not specified. Residents bear all utility costs.
No notes yet
Jefferson Cedar Ridge is significantly underpriced relative to comparable 1BR units in its market, asking $1,245 against a $1,331 benchmark—an 86-basis-point discount that suggests either weak positioning or intentional value capture. The property is offering modest concessions ($250/month rent reduction, ~1.15 weeks value) despite the rental gap, indicating management is not aggressively competing on lease terms. With only 1 active listing against 360 units and zero availability recorded as of March 21, 2026, the property appears fully leased or near stabilization, though the single recent lease event ($1,245, November 2025) provides limited visibility into current absorption velocity. The absence of 2BR/3BR pricing data prevents assessment of unit-type performance, but the market benchmarks ($1,625 for 2BR, $2,099 for 3BR) suggest meaningful revenue upside if the portfolio can shift to higher-bedroom-count demand.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BR | 1 | 660 | $1,245 | Active | Nov 12 | 146 | |
|
Nov $1,245
|
|||||||
| Unit 56 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 21 | 97 | |
| Unit 55 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 19 | 98 | |
| Unit 53 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 24 | 1 | |
| Unit 52 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 17 | 96 | |
| Unit 49 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 20 | 1 | |
| Unit 41 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 11 | 1 | |
| Unit 39 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 10 | 1 | |
| Unit 38 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 9 | 1 | |
| Unit 36 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 7 | 1 | |
| Unit 35 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 6 | 1 | |
| Unit 33 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 4 | 1 | |
| Unit 32 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Apr 3 | 1 | |
| Unit 30 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 31 | 1 | |
| Unit 27 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 29 | 1 | |
| Unit 26 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 27 | 2 | |
| Unit 24 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 26 | 1 | |
| Unit 23 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 25 | 1 | |
| Unit 22 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 23 | 2 | |
| Unit 20 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 22 | 1 | |
| Unit 18 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 20 | 1 | |
| Unit 17 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 19 | 1 | |
| Unit 16 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 18 | 1 | |
| Unit 14 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 17 | 1 | |
| Unit 11 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 14 | 1 | |
| Unit 9 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 13 | 1 | |
| Unit 8 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 12 | 1 | |
| Unit 6 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 11 | 1 | |
| Unit 5 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 9 | 2 | |
| Unit 4 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 8 | 1 | |
| Unit 1 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 6 | 1 | |
| Unit 98 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 3 | 2 | |
| Unit 96 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Mar 2 | 1 | |
| Unit 95 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 28 | 1 | |
| Unit 91 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 25 | 2 | |
| Unit 90 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 23 | 2 | |
| Unit 85 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 20 | 2 | |
| Unit 84 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 18 | 2 | |
| Unit 83 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 17 | 1 | |
| Unit 81 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 16 | 1 | |
| Unit 80 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 15 | 1 | |
| Unit 79 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 14 | 1 | |
| Unit 78 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 13 | 1 | |
| Unit 77 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 12 | 1 | |
| Unit 74 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 8 | 2 | |
| Unit 71 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 5 | 1 | |
| Unit 69 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 4 | 1 | |
| Unit 68 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 3 | 1 | |
| Unit 66 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Feb 1 | 1 | |
| Unit 64 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 30 | 1 | |
| Unit 62 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 27 | 8 | |
| Unit 59 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 24 | 7 | |
| Unit 57 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 23 | 8 | |
| Unit 58 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 20 | 7 | |
| Unit 51 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 16 | 8 | |
| Unit 47 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 15 | 8 | |
| Unit 44 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 11 | 10 | |
| Unit 42 | 1BR | 569 | $891 | Inactive | Jan 10 | 8 | |
No notes yet
Affordability & Income Mismatch Signal Risk
At $1,245/month rent, the property targets households earning ~$57K annually (using the 26.2% affordability ratio within the 1-mile radius), but median HHI is $69,975—indicating pricing above the core walkable neighborhood's income capacity. The 3-mile radius shows further deterioration: affordability ratio widens to 27.6% despite lower median income of $68,696, suggesting the submarket is price-stretched. However, the 5-mile suburban ring ($72,740 median HHI, 25.5% ratio) signals adequate support if the property can capture that outer geography's demand.
Renter Concentration Peaks in 3-Mile Ring but Income Skews Lower
The 3-mile radius exhibits the highest renter concentration at 49.8%, indicating demand depth, yet also concentrates lower-income households: 40.4% earn under $50K vs. 36.5% in the 1-mile core. This suggests the immediate trade area is workforce-housing oriented, not affluent renters. The 1-mile footprint is better-quality (44.4% renter, 37.6% under $50K), implying the property sits between competing demographic pressures.
Population Scale & Growth Trajectory Missing
Without year-over-year population growth data or prime renter cohort (age 25-34) percentages, demand trajectory remains unclear—critical for justifying $1.245M+ rent roll sustainability in a potentially stagnant or outward-moving submarket.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 3 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
Unit Mix Interpretation:
Jefferson Cedar Ridge is a single-asset bet on one-bedroom units—58 units (16.1% of the 360-unit portfolio) with an average rent of $1.245M, representing severe concentration risk and an incomplete dataset. The property lists only one active rental comp at $1.245K for 660 sq ft, which is insufficient to validate pricing power or market positioning. With zero studio, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom units, the property entirely lacks diversification across tenant profiles, limiting appeal to young professionals seeking roommate flexibility or families needing space, and creating acute lease-up and retention vulnerability if one-bedroom demand softens in the Dallas market.
Estimated from 58 listed units (16.1% of 360 total)
No notes yet
We love pets! A maximum of 2 pets are allowed per apartment. Restricted breeds are as follows: Akita, Chow Chow, Dalmatian, Doberman, Elkhound, Foxhound, German Shepherd, Great Dane, Greyhound, Keeshond, Malamute, Pitt Bull/American Bull Terrier, Presa Canario, Rottweiler. Additionally, mixed breeds of these dogs are also restricted. This list should not be considered all-inclusive. Please remember some breeds have nicknames and most have variations of their breed. Exotic animals and exotic rodents are not allowed. No Smoking.
No notes yet
Appraisal History – Jefferson Cedar Ridge
With only one appraisal on file (2025: $56.4M), trend analysis is impossible, but the per-unit value of $156.7K and 96.7% improvement-to-total ratio are consistent with a recently stabilized 2022-built asset. The negligible land value ($1.85M, 3.3% of total) reflects minimal redevelopment optionality—this is a modern, purpose-built structure with limited tear-down or major renovation upside. Without prior appraaisals, inability to assess whether current valuation reflects post-2023 market compression or if the property has appreciated since delivery.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $56,395,520 |
No notes yet
Rating trajectory and composition signal improving operational execution masking underlying property issues. The 70-basis-point improvement from 3.6 to 4.3 over the last six months reflects staff-driven satisfaction—Stephanie and maintenance personnel (Jonathan, Leonel) appear consistently in recent 5-star reviews—but the distribution remains bimodal: 134 five-star and 15 one-star ratings with minimal middle ground. Negative reviews cluster around three persistent pain points: pest infestation (Unit 3203 roaches), thin walls/noise, and management turnover, all cited in early 2026 with operational language ("management changes every couple months") suggesting systemic rather than isolated failures. The divergence between leasing/post-move experience (universally praised) and resident occupancy experience (pest, noise, management instability) indicates strong front-end sales but weak back-office operations and property condition control—a red flag for lease renewal and resident lifetime value.
166 reviews total
I had an overall decent experience living here, but my move-out experience was extremely disappointing . After moving out, a damage charge was posted to my resident portal. Shortly after, I received an email stating a different charge amount that was higher than what was originally listed. There was no clear explanation for the discrepancy, no revised itemized statement, and no proactive communication to justify the increase. Transparency and consistency are critical when handling resident accounts, and unfortunately, that was lacking here. I would strongly advise future residents to document everything at move-out and closely monitor their portal and emails to avoid surprise charges.
Owner response
Thank you for reviewing, Raquel. We do our best to make the move-out process convenient, and our team would welcome the chance to clear up any questions you have about your experience. Would you please drop by the office or call us? We appreciate your time.
Very polite and patient, greeted with a smile.
Owner response
Hi Olivia, we appreciate you taking the time to share how impressed you are by our team's friendly service! Please let us know if there is anything else you need, and thanks for your five stars.
The staff is so helpful and understanding especially Stephanie she was really helpful with the transition and info I needed
Owner response
Bubba, what a wonderful review! We strive to make transitions as easy as can be, so it is great to know that Stephanie was a good source of support to you. Please let us know if there is anything else we can do for you.
RUN DONT WALK! DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT RENT UNIT 3203. YOU WILL LIVE WITH THE ROACHES! WALLS ARE THIN YOU CAN HEAR AND SMELL EVERYTHING. MANAGEMENT IS THE WORSE AND CHANGES EVERY COUPLE OF MONTHS.
Owner response
Hello Monae, thank you for reaching out. We take great pride in providing residents with comfortable, well-maintained homes, so we are concerned by your feedback. Please allow us an opportunity to learn more about your observations so we can take appropriate action. When you have a moment to talk, please call or stop by our office.
Awesome Staff! They where very helpful and patient during my application process. I really appreciate Ms. Angelique's time and help it really made my experience 100x better !
Owner response
Hello Bryan, we very much appreciate you personally acknowledging our "awesome" team members, especially Ms. Angelique! It has been our pleasure working with you through the application process. Let us know if there is anything else we can do for you.
No notes yet
No notes yet