WHARF AT THE SOUND

9655 WHARF RD, DALLAS, TX, 75019

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Mid-Rise 297 units Built 2017 5 stories ★ 2.5 (22 reviews) 🚶 22 Car-Dependent 🚌 0 No Nearby Transit 🚲 28 Somewhat Bikeable

$65,500,000

2025 Appraised Value

↑ 10.1% from prior year

🏘️ Community includes 2 DCAD parcels (539 total units)

WHARF AT THE SOUND – Executive Summary

The 10.1% YoY appraisal appreciation to $65.5M masks severe operational deterioration and structural market headwinds that undermine the Class A 2017-vintage positioning. While the 70.3% LTV and zero-supply pipeline eliminate refinancing and competitive threats, Google reviews consistently document 45-day elevator outages, security failures, and aggressive fee enforcement—signaling deferred capex and mismanagement requiring material repositioning spend. The 1-mile submarket's 93.9% renter occupancy with 18.3% affordability ratio and zero transit access reveals a fragile demand profile wholly dependent on high-income earner concentration ($113.7K median); broader regional homeownership capacity (54.8% at 3-mile radius) suggests this affluent rental bubble lacks depth during macro softness. Deteriorating submarket vacancy trends independent of new supply indicate tenant migration or existing oversupply, not temporary market friction. Pass or watch-list pending operational audit and rent roll verification—the valuation premium appears unjustified given maintenance liabilities, management quality questions, and location constraints that will pressure occupancy if high-income renter demand softens.

AI overview · Updated 21 days ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

Limited Data Set Constrains Assessment: Only 2 exterior photos were analyzed with zero interior unit imagery, preventing evaluation of kitchen/bath finishes, appliance quality, or unit-level renovation consistency—critical inputs for value-add positioning. The 2017 construction date and estimated 2018–2020 renovation window suggest Class A positioning, but photographic evidence of interior condition is absent.

Exterior Positioning Indicates Strong Curb Appeal: Contemporary mixed-use architecture with mixed cladding (white/charcoal), modern metal railings, and large glazing reflects current market standards. Fresh paint condition and 5–6 story mid-rise with surface parking support Class A/B+ positioning typical of 2017-era coastal multifamily.

Recommend interior unit photography to assess finish spec, appliance grade, flooring type (carpet vs. luxury vinyl), and renovation depth across unit mix before finalizing asset class and value-add thesis.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago

/

AI Analysis

WHARF AT THE SOUND faces acute location constraints that will pressure leasing and pricing. The property's walk score of 22 and zero transit access classify it as car-dependent with no public transportation options—a severe liability in today's multifamily market, particularly for younger renters and cost-conscious tenants who avoid vehicle ownership. The bike score of 28 indicates minimal cycling infrastructure, further limiting non-automotive mobility. Without average rent data we cannot assess whether pricing reflects this accessibility deficit, but a 297-unit asset in Dallas with no transit connectivity will struggle to justify rates competitive with walkable urban or near-downtown alternatives and will skew toward car-owning households only.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago
Distance Name Category
📍 15.3 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Supply Pipeline: Minimal Competitive Threat, But Occupancy Headwinds Elsewhere

Zero units in the submarket pipeline (0.0% of the 297-unit property) eliminates new supply pressure on this asset. However, the deteriorating vacancy trend across the submarket signals demand weakness that isn't driven by incoming competition—suggesting macro softness, tenant migration, or existing oversupply issues that supply filters won't resolve. Absent near-term deliveries, rent growth will depend entirely on the property's ability to outperform during a weakening market cycle.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago
🏗️ 0 permits within 3 mi
0% pipeline

No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles

Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt & Transaction History

The property carries $42.9M in senior debt against a $61.0M estimated sale price, yielding a 70.3% LTV—reasonable leverage but tight for refinancing risk given the October 2020 origination date and unknown maturity. With two loans totaling $42.9M originated within months of each other, the structure suggests a bridge-and-permanent setup typical of development or value-add plays, though missing maturity dates and DSCR data prevent assessment of near-term refinancing pressure. The absentee individual owner's 5.5-year hold with only two transactions indicates a medium-term hold strategy rather than a flip, reducing distress signals; however, the $144.2K gap between appraised and estimated sale value and the lack of rate/term specificity warrants verification of loan performance and maturity timing. No foreclosure or deed-in-lieu signals appear in the chain.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago
Ownership Duration
5.5 years
Since Oct 2020
Transactions
2 recorded
Owner Type
Individual
Absentee owner
Owner Mailing Address
1722 ROUTH ST STE 770, DALLAS, TX 75201-2588
Current Lender
Regions Bk
Loan Amount
$42,670,000 ($143,670/unit)
Maturity Date
Not recorded
Loan Type
Unknown
October 09, 2020 Resale Grant Deed
Buyer: Neighborhoods At Cw No 2 Wharf, from Soun A Land Ltd via Simplifile Lc E Recording
Sale price: $53,337,500
Regions Bk $42,670,000 Senior
August 18, 2020 Stand Alone Finance Deed of Trust
Buyer: Maltese Energy & Transport Llc,
Bell Rock Income Fund 1 Llc $212,000 Senior
Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
$60,957,143
Sale $/Unit
$205,242
Value YoY
+10.1%
Implied Cap Rate
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
Est. Vacancy
Submarket Vac.
6.0%
Eff. Gross Income
OpEx Ratio
50%
Est. NOI
NOI/Unit

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
$5,513/yr
Est. DSCR

Based on most recent loan: $42,670,000 (Oct 2020, attom)

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
4.45%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$275,191
Property: $205,242 (↓25%)
Rent/SF
$2.16/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

WHARF AT THE SOUND is a 297-unit, five-story mid-rise apartment built in 2017 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior. The property totals 359.2K SF gross building area with 258.6K SF net leasable area, reflecting a 72.0% efficiency ratio typical for mid-rise urban products. Rated in good condition across structure and finishes, the asset is situated in a car-dependent location (Walk Score 22) with parking configuration unspecified. Google rating of 2.5 suggests operational or resident satisfaction headwinds warranting due diligence on management and competitive positioning.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago

Property Details

Account #
008466000F0010000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Mid-Rise
Construction
D-WOOD FRAME
Quality
GOOD
Condition
GOOD
Stories
5
Gross Building Area
359,202 SF
Net Leasable Area
258,639 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
October 09, 2020
Place ID
ChIJTe20_7UpTIYR49maYaZX5DY
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
3 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
NEIGHBORHOODS AT CW NO 2
Mailing Address
WHARF LTD
DALLAS, TEXAS 752012588
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

The 1-mile submarket is an affluent renter island with exceptional density but narrow demand sustainability. The immediate radius shows 93.9% renter occupancy and median household income of $113.7K, yet the affordability ratio of 18.3% signals tight affordability—renters are dedicating nearly one-fifth of income to housing. The income distribution is heavily skewed toward $100K+ earners (54% of households), indicating this is not workforce housing but rather a choice rental market dependent on high earner concentration. The 3-mile radius reveals the critical tension: broader market income ($129.4K median) and lower renter occupancy (54.8%) suggest strong homeownership capacity in the surrounding area, meaning the property lacks a deep workforce renter buffer and depends on affluent renters willing to forgo ownership. Without rent data, the affordability ratio implies monthly rents likely exceed $1.7K—sustainable only if high-income renter demand remains durable.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago

1-Mile Radius

Population
2,678
Households
1,466
Avg Household Size
1.83
Median HH Income
$113,698
Median Home Value
$0
Median Rent
$1,737
% Renter Occupied
93.9%
Affordability
18.3% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

3-Mile Radius

Population
75,556
Households
29,764
Avg Household Size
2.61
Median HH Income
$129,357
Median Home Value
$472,429
Median Rent
$1,771
% Renter Occupied
54.8%
Affordability
16.4% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
164,665
Households
68,586
Avg Household Size
2.47
Median HH Income
$116,961
Median Home Value
$457,334
Median Rent
$1,817
% Renter Occupied
62.8%
Affordability
18.6% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 1 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Appraisal History – WHARF AT THE SOUND

The property appreciated 10.1% YoY to $65.5M, translating to $220.5K per unit—a healthy valuation for a 2017-vintage asset in the current rate environment. With improvements representing 98.2% of total value versus land at just 1.8% ($1.2M), this is a fully-built, operationally-driven asset with minimal redevelopment optionality; any value creation must come through NOI expansion rather than repositioning. The single appraisal snapshot limits trend analysis, but the double-digit appreciation suggests either strong operational performance, market cap rate compression, or both.

AI analysis · Updated 2 months ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $65,500,000 +10.1%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Rating trajectory masks severe operational deterioration. The 3.0-point improvement in the last six months is driven by five 5-star reviews with no text (likely incentivized or fake), while substantive complaints remain consistent: 45-day elevator outages, persistent theft, broken gate access, package mismanagement, and aggressive violation fee enforcement ($75 charges). The 1-star concentration (10 of 22 reviews) centered on maintenance responsiveness, security, and management quality directly contradicts the property's upscale positioning. This review pattern suggests deferred capex (elevators, gates, hallways) coupled with aggressive resident nickel-and-diming, signaling both capital underinvestment and operational mismanagement that would require significant repositioning investment.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

Rating Distribution

5★
6 (29%)
4★
0 (0%)
3★
1 (5%)
2★
4 (19%)
1★
10 (48%)

21 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

Meghan Rynders ★☆☆☆☆ Feb 2026

DO NOT MOVE HERE WHATEVER YOU DO! The problems with the elevators are constant and ongoing and the office is extremely slow to respond. We had an elevators outage for 45 days and the residents were not compensated for the inconvenience in any way shape or form. This is an over priced “luxury” apartment that has constant issues with the garages, packages being stolen, air conditioners breaking constantly. With so many options to live I would never choose this place. I’ve been a 5 year resident and paid almost $200,000
to this apartment in rent. The day I am moving out of my 5th floor apartment the elevator is conveniently closed down by the fire marshal as the call button to call the fire department wasn’t working. Nothing was actually wrong with the elevator but it made my move cost three times as much as the elevator was broken. If you want to pay way too much money to a very incompetent office staff move here. Otherwise RUN VERY FAR AWAY.

DWP ★★★★★ Local Guide Dec 2025
snehal patil ★☆☆☆☆ Nov 2025

Extremely Disappointed – Ongoing Theft Issues and Poor Management Response

Really disappointed with the experience at this apartment complex. My Stanley tumbler was stolen from the gym, and I’ve also had packages disappear within an hour of delivery notifications. It’s extremely frustrating that there are no cameras or proper security measures in the gym or mailroom to prevent thefts.

What makes it worse is the slow and unresponsive management — it takes ages to get any reply or action on reported issues. The apartment might have a nice view, but be prepared for your belongings or deliveries to go missing with little help from the staff. Very poor management for the rent we pay.

Michele Elliott ★★☆☆☆ Apr 2025

Package deliveries are consistently misdirected at this property. Assistance from leasing office staff, specifically Jenice, was unhelpful and dismissive. Future residents should be aware of potential challenges with service and communication. I hope management will address these concerns to improve future residents’ experiences.

Kylo Tran ★★★★★ Local Guide Apr 2025
Showing 5 of 21 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet