MEADOW PARC APTS

4811 DUNCANVILLE RD, DALLAS, TX, 752361871

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Garden 184 units Built 1999 2 stories ★ 3.7 (79 reviews) 🚶 15 Car-Dependent 🚌 24 Minimal Transit 🚲 36 Somewhat Bikeable

$34,146,270

2025 Appraised Value

↑ 18.5% from prior year

MEADOW PARC APTS – INVESTMENT OVERVIEW

Watch List / Conditional Pursuit

The 18.5% year-over-year appraisal appreciation to $34.1M ($185.6K/unit) signals either aggressive NOI growth or cap rate compression on a stabilized 1999-vintage asset, but sustainability is unverifiable without current operating data—a critical gap given the property's reliance on workforce tenants in a 1–3 mile radius earning $50–$60K median HHI. Operationally, Google reviews reveal a bimodal pattern: recent five-star clustering around leasing staff masks endemic work-order delays and maintenance neglect cited by longer-tenure residents, flagging execution risk and potential management turnover. The absence of reported debt on a $34M property is atypical and requires direct verification; combined with a 12.6-year hold and minimal land value (1.8% of appraisal), this suggests a stabilized cash-flowing hold unlikely to be distressed, but also signals limited upside without unit-level renovation roadmap. Walk score of 15 and missing unit-mix/rent data preclude demand-side confidence, though the 4-unit pipeline poses negligible supply pressure. Proceed to underwriting only with complete rent comps, unit finishes photography, and current debt/DSCR documentation—operational discipline and financing clarity will determine investment merit.

AI overview · Updated about 18 hours ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

Meadow Parc is convenient to shopping, dining and entertainment!

Convenience and Lifestyle is what you will get when you choose your home at Meadow Parc!

Limited visibility into unit finishes—only 2 photos analyzed and neither captured interior spaces—prevents assessment of renovation status or finish specifications. The amenity package appears Class B appropriate: resort-style pool with concrete decking, manicured grounds, and modern playground equipment suggest adequate maintenance and curb appeal for a 1999 garden-style community. Without kitchen/bathroom photography, cannot determine whether the property retains original late-1990s finishes or has undergone selective renovation, which is critical for establishing value-add runway on a 184-unit asset at this age.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

/

AI Analysis

Location Profile Misaligned with Market Positioning

Meadow Parc's walk score of 15 and transit score of 24 place it firmly in car-dependent territory with minimal last-mile connectivity—a liability for attracting urban-focused renters or reducing tenant transportation costs. The moderate bike score of 36 offers limited differentiation for sustainability-minded prospects. Without nearby amenities density or proximity to major employment corridors documented, this 184-unit asset relies entirely on affordability positioning to compete; without disclosed rent data, it's unclear whether the location trade-off is compensated through pricing power or occupancy challenges. This geographic constraint typically demands either sub-market rental rates or a family/workforce housing tenant profile to justify investment.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago
Distance Name Category
📍 9.3 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Pipeline supply poses minimal near-term pressure: 4 units represents just 2.2% of Meadow Parc's 184-unit inventory, well below the threshold for material occupancy risk. However, the deteriorating submarket vacancy trend warrants close monitoring—the pipeline's timing matters more than its absolute size in a softening market. The five permits span 2022–2026 with mixed advancement stages (two in inspection, two in review/payment, one requiring revisions), suggesting staggered deliveries that could extend competition across multiple lease cycles rather than concentrate it. Distance details are unavailable, but the permit locations (Wheatland Rd, Westmoreland Rd, etc.) suggest scattered infill rather than dense competitive clustering directly adjacent to the property.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago
🏗️ 4 permits within 3 mi
2% pipeline
Distance Address Description Status Filed
1.7 mi 4324 CORRAL DR New apartments Revisions Required Jul 26, 2022
2.0 mi 6400 S WESTMORELAND RD QTEAM MEETING 2.10.2026 (All Day) 216-unit senior living ... Plan Review Dec 22, 2025
2.8 mi 2925 SPRUCE VALLEY LN 52 Condos New Construction (Multifamily) Inspection Phase Apr 18, 2024
2.9 mi 2720 COOMBS CREEK DR Q Team - Coombs Creek Apartments New 4 story MFD project,... Inspection Phase Aug 18, 2023
Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt & Transaction History

Debt & Ownership Interpretation: Meadow Parc Apts

The absence of active debt records is the critical finding here—a 184-unit, $34.1M asset with no reported loans suggests either a debt-free hold or incomplete loan data capture. The single transaction since 2013 (12.6-year hold) and deed-of-trust filing without consideration amount indicate a refinance or internal restructuring rather than a traditional acquisition; combined with absentee corporate ownership, this points to a stabilized, cash-flowing asset unlikely to be motivated seller at current market. Without DSCR or loan-to-value data, refinancing risk cannot be assessed, but the extended hold period and clean deed chain rule out distress signals. Verify current loan status directly—absence of reported debt on a $34M property is atypical and may reflect data gaps rather than actual leverage position.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago
Ownership Duration
12.6 years
Since Aug 2013
Transactions
1 recorded
Owner Type
Company
Absentee owner
Owner Mailing Address
3939 N HAMPTON RD, DALLAS, TX 75212-1630

🏛️ TX Comptroller Entity Data

Beneficial Owner
Chetana Chaphekar high
via officer match
Registered Agent
The Housing Authority Of The City Of Dallas, Texas
C/O LEGAL DEPARTMENT 3939 NORTH HAMPTON ROAD, DALLAS, TX, 75212
Officers / Directors
Chetana Chaphekar — DIRECTOR
Chetana Chaphekar — SECRETARY
Chetana Chaphekar — TREASURER
Timothy J Lott — VICE PRESI
Timothy J Lott — DIRECTOR
Entity Mailing Address
C/O LEGAL DEPARTMENT 3939 NORTH HAMPTON, DALLAS, TX, 75212
State of Formation
TX
SOS Status
ACTIVE
August 28, 2013 Stand Alone Finance Deed of Trust
Buyer: Meadow Parc Dev Inc,
Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
Sale $/Unit
Value YoY
+18.5%
Implied Cap Rate
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
Est. Vacancy
Submarket Vac.
2.4%
Eff. Gross Income
OpEx Ratio
45%
Est. NOI
NOI/Unit

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
Est. DSCR

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
8.49%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$74,052
Rent/SF
$1.55/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

Meadow Parc is a 184-unit garden-style apartment built in 1999 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior, rated in good condition across 233.5K SF. The two-story property offers 213.3K SF of net leasable area with amenities data unavailable, though it accommodates dogs and cats subject to breed restrictions. Located in Dallas with a Walk Score of 15, the asset sits in a car-dependent area with limited proximity to retail/dining despite marketing claims; parking type is not specified in available records. No utilities are included in rent.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

Property Details

Account #
008035000H0020000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Garden
Construction
D-WOOD FRAME
Quality
GOOD
Condition
GOOD
Stories
2
Gross Building Area
233,454 SF
Net Leasable Area
213,272 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
December 11, 1998
Place ID
ChIJn_kgqCKQToYRLME4ndIHO9I
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
about 2 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
MEADOW PARC DEVELOPMENT
Mailing Address
INC
DALLAS, TEXAS 752121630
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Performance

Submarket Rent Growth
📊 Nearby properties
Vacancy Trend
Deteriorating
📊 RentCast zip-level data
Submarket Rent/SF
$1.55/sf
📊 Nearby properties

Available Units Over Time

Latest Scrape (Mar 25, 2026)

Available
3 units

Fees

Application: Admin: Pet Deposit: 250.0 Pet Rent Monthly: 15.0
🏠 0 active listings | Trend: No data
Unit Beds Baths Sqft Rent Status Listed Days
BR 2 $1,160 Inactive Sep 16 477
Lantana 2BR 2 1,050 Inactive Mar 25
Larkspur 3BR 2 1,204 Inactive Mar 25
Aster 4BR 2 1,521 Inactive Mar 25
Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

Affordability Risk in Tight 1-Mile Core; Suburban Positioning Improves Demand Depth

The 1-mile radius presents a marginal affordability profile at 24.3%, with median HHI of $58.1K supporting only modest rent—insufficient context without provided avgmonthlyrent, but the 46.5% renter concentration signals limited demand density. Zooming to the 3-mile ring, renter occupancy jumps to 55.6% (highest across all radii) despite flat median income ($58.4K) and rising affordability pressure to 25.6%, indicating the property likely captures workforce renters with constrained purchasing power. The 5-mile suburban ring dilutes the picture: while median HHI improves to $63.8K and affordability reaches 27.1%, renter share drops to 43.8%, suggesting the asset's strongest tenant pool sits in the 1–3 mile band where income skews toward sub-$50K cohorts (47.5% of 3-mile households). Population scale ($72.8K households in 3-mile) supports occupancy, but overleveraged rent-to-income exposure requires verification against actual rent to confirm value-add feasibility.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago

1-Mile Radius

Population
3,832
Households
937
Avg Household Size
4.09
Median HH Income
$58,071
Median Home Value
$275,000
Median Rent
$1,178
% Renter Occupied
46.5%
Affordability
24.3% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

3-Mile Radius

Population
72,772
Households
24,759
Avg Household Size
2.94
Median HH Income
$58,406
Median Home Value
$222,254
Median Rent
$1,247
% Renter Occupied
55.6%
Affordability
25.6% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
249,343
Households
83,101
Avg Household Size
3.03
Median HH Income
$63,780
Median Home Value
$221,447
Median Rent
$1,438
% Renter Occupied
43.8%
Affordability
27.1% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 1 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities

Pet Policy

Pet Friendly - Breed Restrictions. Dogs and Cats allowed.

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Meadow Parc Apts: Single-Year Appraisal Snapshot

The 2025 appraisal at $34.1M represents an 18.5% jump year-over-year, translating to $185.6K per unit—a sharp rerating likely driven by cap rate compression or NOI growth rather than physical improvements on a 26-year-old asset. The land value of $631.6K (1.8% of total) is negligible, indicating minimal redevelopment upside; value is entirely dependent on stabilized operating performance. Without prior-year comparables, the sustainability of this appreciation cannot be assessed, but the magnitude warrants verification of the income assumptions embedded in the 2024 appraisal.

AI analysis · Updated 21 days ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $34,146,270 +18.5%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Rating trajectory masks underlying operational instability. The 6-month average of 5.0 represents a sharp recovery from 4.1 prior, but this masks a bimodal distribution—43 five-star reviews cluster around leasing/front-office staff (specifically "Kinzie" and "Ashley"), while 18 one-star reviews consistently cite work order delays, maintenance neglect, and billing disputes. The three-year tenure residents (24 years, 10+ years) praise current management, yet recent one-stars from shorter-tenure residents (1–1.3 years) indicate deterioration post-occupancy, suggesting staff turnover risk or inconsistent execution between leasing and operations. This positive recency bias from referral reviews is contradicted by operational complaints—work order responsiveness, pest control, and deferred unit upgrades appear endemic, not cyclical.

AI analysis · Updated about 18 hours ago

Rating Distribution

5★
43 (54%)
4★
11 (14%)
3★
5 (6%)
2★
2 (3%)
1★
18 (23%)

79 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

Deric Berquist ★★★★★ Local Guide Dec 2025

coolplace nice people

Von Will ★★★★★ Dec 2025

It was nice

PH ★☆☆☆☆ Oct 2025

I have lived here for over 10 years with no issues until now. I hate it here and can’t wait to move! Issues with work orders to current office staff, little to no upgrades in units until someone moves out of one; and for the most, if a new part or piece of anything is needed, it’s going to be old or used! I hear you T, I’m with you!!
Really hate to rate one star because I used to love it here

Javiees Wurld ★★★★★ Aug 2025

I had such a great experience working with Kinzie while looking for my new apartment! From the moment I walked in, they were friendly, professional, and genuinely interested in helping me find the perfect place. They took the time to answer all my questions, explain every detail clearly, and made the whole process stress-free.

What really stood out to me was how attentive and responsive they were — any time I had a question or needed clarification, they got back to me right away. They made me feel like I wasn’t just another applicant, but someone whose comfort and happiness really mattered.

If you’re looking for an apartment here, I highly recommend working with Kinzie. She truly goes above and beyond to make sure you feel confident and excited about your new home! It’s affordable and just a good spot overall!

Nunu Turner ★★★★☆ Aug 2025

I've been living here since February Im Very satisfied from former and current managers Kinzie is really nice and very understanding and Bianca is really nice and understanding as we'll.

Showing 5 of 79 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet